District Judiciary Retirement Age | Supreme Court Directs Enhancement To 62 Years To Arrest Attrition Of Judicial Talent Slogans Inciting Armed Rebellion Or Challenging Sovereignty Cannot Be Equated With Religious Expressions: Allahabad High Court Denies Bail Revisional Authority Under AP ROR Act Has Jurisdiction To Direct Inquiry Into Illegal Transfers Of Assigned Land: Andhra Pradesh High Court Indian Law Does Not Recognise 'Joint Parenting' As A Statutory Concept; Child Welfare Remains Paramount: Bombay High Court Order 26 Rule 9 CPC | Court Must Appoint Survey-Knowing Commissioner In Suits Alleging Physical Encroachment And Boundary Disputes: Calcutta High Court Section 33-C(2) ID Act | Labour Court Has Jurisdiction To Recover Consequential Benefits Arising From CAT Orders: Delhi High Court Order VIII Rule 1-A(3) CPC | Procedural Law Is Meant For Advancement Of Justice; Technicalities Should Not Scuttle Opportunity To Lead Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court High Court Can Condition Condonation Of Delay In Land Acquisition Appeals Upon Waiver Of Interest For Delayed Period: Bombay High Court Employees Compensation Act | Insurance Company Not Liable To Indemnify Penalty Imposed On Employer Under Section 4-A(3)(b): Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees’ Compensation Act | Failure To Frame Issue On Employer-Employee Relationship Vitiates Commissioner’s Award: Kerala High Court Default Bail Under Section 187 BNSS | Period Of Investigation Depends On Substance Of Allegations In FIR, Not Merely Mentioned Sections: Madhya Pradesh High Court SARFAESI Act | Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Must Be Challenged Under Section 17 Before DRT, Not Via Writ Petition: Kerala High Court

Supreme Court Slams Registry for Violating Principles of Natural Justice - Recalls Earlier Transfer Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India emphasized the "elementary principles of natural justice," criticizing its own Registry for preponing a case listing date. This arose during the hearing of a Review Petition related to a Transfer Petition concerning a matrimonial dispute between Binod Kumar Singh and Ranju Singh.

Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Sanjay Karol noted that the practice of preponing the matters by the Registry "will cause grave injustice to the parties." They further stated that this practice "needs to be rectified immediately," and directed the Registrar (Judicial Listing) to take "serious note of this fact."

Apart from making observations on the procedural irregularities committed by the Registry, the Court also recalled its earlier order that disposed of the Transfer Petition. This came in light of the procedural flaws that marred the integrity of the process. The Court restored the case to its original number and disposed of the Review Petition.

Further, the Court approved the transfer of MAT Suit No.1954 of 2021 from the Court of 1st Additional District Judge, Barasat, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, to the Family Court, Bhojpur, District-Ara, Bihar. Additionally, the respondent-husband was granted permission to appear through video conferencing for future proceedings, unless his physical presence is deemed mandatory.

Legal experts note that this judgment serves as a reminder for judicial bodies to strictly adhere to procedural norms to ensure fairness and justice.

The case has now been disposed of, and the Court directed that any pending applications related to the matter shall also stand disposed of.

Date of Decision: October 12, 2023

BINOD KUMAR SINGH  vs RANJU SINGH         

     

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/12_October_2023-Binod_Kumar_Singh_vs_Ranju_Singh.pdf"]

Latest Legal News