Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Slams Registry for Violating Principles of Natural Justice - Recalls Earlier Transfer Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India emphasized the "elementary principles of natural justice," criticizing its own Registry for preponing a case listing date. This arose during the hearing of a Review Petition related to a Transfer Petition concerning a matrimonial dispute between Binod Kumar Singh and Ranju Singh.

Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Sanjay Karol noted that the practice of preponing the matters by the Registry "will cause grave injustice to the parties." They further stated that this practice "needs to be rectified immediately," and directed the Registrar (Judicial Listing) to take "serious note of this fact."

Apart from making observations on the procedural irregularities committed by the Registry, the Court also recalled its earlier order that disposed of the Transfer Petition. This came in light of the procedural flaws that marred the integrity of the process. The Court restored the case to its original number and disposed of the Review Petition.

Further, the Court approved the transfer of MAT Suit No.1954 of 2021 from the Court of 1st Additional District Judge, Barasat, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, to the Family Court, Bhojpur, District-Ara, Bihar. Additionally, the respondent-husband was granted permission to appear through video conferencing for future proceedings, unless his physical presence is deemed mandatory.

Legal experts note that this judgment serves as a reminder for judicial bodies to strictly adhere to procedural norms to ensure fairness and justice.

The case has now been disposed of, and the Court directed that any pending applications related to the matter shall also stand disposed of.

Date of Decision: October 12, 2023

BINOD KUMAR SINGH  vs RANJU SINGH         

     

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/12_October_2023-Binod_Kumar_Singh_vs_Ranju_Singh.pdf"]

Latest Legal News