Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Writ Petition Cannot Be Dismissed On ‘Forum Non Conveniens’ If Respondent's Office Is Within Court's Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Supreme Court Doubts 'Sajjan Singh' Ruling; Refers To Larger Bench Whether Third Judge Can Re-examine Unanimous Findings Under Section 392 CrPC SARFAESI Sale Vitiated If Balance 75% Bid Amount Is Paid Beyond 15 Days Without Written Extension Agreement: Supreme Court Delhi High Court Can't Refuse Writ Petition Against BSF Dismissal Merely Because Cause Of Action Arose Outside Delhi: Supreme Court Private Rights Must Yield To Public Interest: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Removal Of Encroachments On Public Road Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Re-Agitate Factual Disputes Or Seek Re-Hearing On Merits: Allahabad High Court Recovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act Vitiated If Police Already Present At Spot Before Arrival Of Panch Witnesses: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Compliance Or Delay In Procedure Under Section 52A NDPS Act Is An Irregularity, Not An Illegality Entitling Accused To Bail: Calcutta High Court Recovery Of Weapon Used In Commission Of Offence Not A Sine Qua Non For Conviction If Ocular Evidence Is Corroborated: Allahabad High Court

Supreme Court Slams Registry for Violating Principles of Natural Justice - Recalls Earlier Transfer Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India emphasized the "elementary principles of natural justice," criticizing its own Registry for preponing a case listing date. This arose during the hearing of a Review Petition related to a Transfer Petition concerning a matrimonial dispute between Binod Kumar Singh and Ranju Singh.

Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Sanjay Karol noted that the practice of preponing the matters by the Registry "will cause grave injustice to the parties." They further stated that this practice "needs to be rectified immediately," and directed the Registrar (Judicial Listing) to take "serious note of this fact."

Apart from making observations on the procedural irregularities committed by the Registry, the Court also recalled its earlier order that disposed of the Transfer Petition. This came in light of the procedural flaws that marred the integrity of the process. The Court restored the case to its original number and disposed of the Review Petition.

Further, the Court approved the transfer of MAT Suit No.1954 of 2021 from the Court of 1st Additional District Judge, Barasat, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, to the Family Court, Bhojpur, District-Ara, Bihar. Additionally, the respondent-husband was granted permission to appear through video conferencing for future proceedings, unless his physical presence is deemed mandatory.

Legal experts note that this judgment serves as a reminder for judicial bodies to strictly adhere to procedural norms to ensure fairness and justice.

The case has now been disposed of, and the Court directed that any pending applications related to the matter shall also stand disposed of.

Date of Decision: October 12, 2023

BINOD KUMAR SINGH  vs RANJU SINGH         

     

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/12_October_2023-Binod_Kumar_Singh_vs_Ranju_Singh.pdf"]

Latest Legal News