Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Slams Registry for Violating Principles of Natural Justice - Recalls Earlier Transfer Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India emphasized the "elementary principles of natural justice," criticizing its own Registry for preponing a case listing date. This arose during the hearing of a Review Petition related to a Transfer Petition concerning a matrimonial dispute between Binod Kumar Singh and Ranju Singh.

Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Sanjay Karol noted that the practice of preponing the matters by the Registry "will cause grave injustice to the parties." They further stated that this practice "needs to be rectified immediately," and directed the Registrar (Judicial Listing) to take "serious note of this fact."

Apart from making observations on the procedural irregularities committed by the Registry, the Court also recalled its earlier order that disposed of the Transfer Petition. This came in light of the procedural flaws that marred the integrity of the process. The Court restored the case to its original number and disposed of the Review Petition.

Further, the Court approved the transfer of MAT Suit No.1954 of 2021 from the Court of 1st Additional District Judge, Barasat, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, to the Family Court, Bhojpur, District-Ara, Bihar. Additionally, the respondent-husband was granted permission to appear through video conferencing for future proceedings, unless his physical presence is deemed mandatory.

Legal experts note that this judgment serves as a reminder for judicial bodies to strictly adhere to procedural norms to ensure fairness and justice.

The case has now been disposed of, and the Court directed that any pending applications related to the matter shall also stand disposed of.

Date of Decision: October 12, 2023

BINOD KUMAR SINGH  vs RANJU SINGH         

     

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/12_October_2023-Binod_Kumar_Singh_vs_Ranju_Singh.pdf"]

Latest Legal News