Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT's Observations on Environmental Clearance, Upholds Prosecution Conditions

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India set aside a portion of the National Green Tribunal's (NGT) judgment pertaining to the validity of environmental clearance for M/s Sweta Estate Pvt. Ltd., while upholding the decision to prosecute the company for violations of environmental norms.

The bench, comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Sanjay Karol, reviewed the appeal filed by M/s Sweta Estate Pvt. Ltd. against the NGT's order. The case revolved around the appellant's housing project in Gurgaon and their compliance with the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, and the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.

Justice Oka, in his judgment, stated, "Considering the limited scope of appeal, NGT ought not to have gone into the question of whether the construction carried out by the appellant between 9th April 2012 to 29th August 2017 was illegal." This statement led to the Supreme Court setting aside NGT's observations related to the expiration of the environmental clearance (EC) and the legality of the construction activities during this period.

Furthermore, the apex court confirmed NGT's decision regarding the conditions of the ex-post facto Consent to Establish (CTE) granted to the appellant. The court emphasized that "after having acted upon the ex-post facto CTE dated 18th October 2017, the appellant cannot be allowed to approbate and reprobate." This effectively means that the company must adhere to the prosecution conditions as per the ex-post facto CTE.

This ruling has significant implications for environmental law and corporate compliance in India. It underscores the importance of adhering to environmental norms and the consequences of non-compliance. The decision also clarifies the scope and limitations of appellate authorities in environmental matters.

The Supreme Court's decision brings a new dimension to the interpretation of environmental laws in India, particularly regarding the retrospective effect of compliance measures and the legal responsibilities of corporations in environmental preservation.

Date of Decision: 10 November 2023

M/s Sweta Estate Pvt.Ltd. Gurgaon VS Haryana State Pollution Control Board  & Anr.

Latest Legal News