Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT's Observations on Environmental Clearance, Upholds Prosecution Conditions

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India set aside a portion of the National Green Tribunal's (NGT) judgment pertaining to the validity of environmental clearance for M/s Sweta Estate Pvt. Ltd., while upholding the decision to prosecute the company for violations of environmental norms.

The bench, comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Sanjay Karol, reviewed the appeal filed by M/s Sweta Estate Pvt. Ltd. against the NGT's order. The case revolved around the appellant's housing project in Gurgaon and their compliance with the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, and the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.

Justice Oka, in his judgment, stated, "Considering the limited scope of appeal, NGT ought not to have gone into the question of whether the construction carried out by the appellant between 9th April 2012 to 29th August 2017 was illegal." This statement led to the Supreme Court setting aside NGT's observations related to the expiration of the environmental clearance (EC) and the legality of the construction activities during this period.

Furthermore, the apex court confirmed NGT's decision regarding the conditions of the ex-post facto Consent to Establish (CTE) granted to the appellant. The court emphasized that "after having acted upon the ex-post facto CTE dated 18th October 2017, the appellant cannot be allowed to approbate and reprobate." This effectively means that the company must adhere to the prosecution conditions as per the ex-post facto CTE.

This ruling has significant implications for environmental law and corporate compliance in India. It underscores the importance of adhering to environmental norms and the consequences of non-compliance. The decision also clarifies the scope and limitations of appellate authorities in environmental matters.

The Supreme Court's decision brings a new dimension to the interpretation of environmental laws in India, particularly regarding the retrospective effect of compliance measures and the legal responsibilities of corporations in environmental preservation.

Date of Decision: 10 November 2023

M/s Sweta Estate Pvt.Ltd. Gurgaon VS Haryana State Pollution Control Board  & Anr.

Latest Legal News