Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |    

Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT's Observations on Environmental Clearance, Upholds Prosecution Conditions

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India set aside a portion of the National Green Tribunal's (NGT) judgment pertaining to the validity of environmental clearance for M/s Sweta Estate Pvt. Ltd., while upholding the decision to prosecute the company for violations of environmental norms.

The bench, comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Sanjay Karol, reviewed the appeal filed by M/s Sweta Estate Pvt. Ltd. against the NGT's order. The case revolved around the appellant's housing project in Gurgaon and their compliance with the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, and the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.

Justice Oka, in his judgment, stated, "Considering the limited scope of appeal, NGT ought not to have gone into the question of whether the construction carried out by the appellant between 9th April 2012 to 29th August 2017 was illegal." This statement led to the Supreme Court setting aside NGT's observations related to the expiration of the environmental clearance (EC) and the legality of the construction activities during this period.

Furthermore, the apex court confirmed NGT's decision regarding the conditions of the ex-post facto Consent to Establish (CTE) granted to the appellant. The court emphasized that "after having acted upon the ex-post facto CTE dated 18th October 2017, the appellant cannot be allowed to approbate and reprobate." This effectively means that the company must adhere to the prosecution conditions as per the ex-post facto CTE.

This ruling has significant implications for environmental law and corporate compliance in India. It underscores the importance of adhering to environmental norms and the consequences of non-compliance. The decision also clarifies the scope and limitations of appellate authorities in environmental matters.

The Supreme Court's decision brings a new dimension to the interpretation of environmental laws in India, particularly regarding the retrospective effect of compliance measures and the legal responsibilities of corporations in environmental preservation.

Date of Decision: 10 November 2023

M/s Sweta Estate Pvt.Ltd. Gurgaon VS Haryana State Pollution Control Board  & Anr.

Similar News