MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT's Observations on Environmental Clearance, Upholds Prosecution Conditions

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India set aside a portion of the National Green Tribunal's (NGT) judgment pertaining to the validity of environmental clearance for M/s Sweta Estate Pvt. Ltd., while upholding the decision to prosecute the company for violations of environmental norms.

The bench, comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Sanjay Karol, reviewed the appeal filed by M/s Sweta Estate Pvt. Ltd. against the NGT's order. The case revolved around the appellant's housing project in Gurgaon and their compliance with the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, and the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.

Justice Oka, in his judgment, stated, "Considering the limited scope of appeal, NGT ought not to have gone into the question of whether the construction carried out by the appellant between 9th April 2012 to 29th August 2017 was illegal." This statement led to the Supreme Court setting aside NGT's observations related to the expiration of the environmental clearance (EC) and the legality of the construction activities during this period.

Furthermore, the apex court confirmed NGT's decision regarding the conditions of the ex-post facto Consent to Establish (CTE) granted to the appellant. The court emphasized that "after having acted upon the ex-post facto CTE dated 18th October 2017, the appellant cannot be allowed to approbate and reprobate." This effectively means that the company must adhere to the prosecution conditions as per the ex-post facto CTE.

This ruling has significant implications for environmental law and corporate compliance in India. It underscores the importance of adhering to environmental norms and the consequences of non-compliance. The decision also clarifies the scope and limitations of appellate authorities in environmental matters.

The Supreme Court's decision brings a new dimension to the interpretation of environmental laws in India, particularly regarding the retrospective effect of compliance measures and the legal responsibilities of corporations in environmental preservation.

Date of Decision: 10 November 2023

M/s Sweta Estate Pvt.Ltd. Gurgaon VS Haryana State Pollution Control Board  & Anr.

Latest Legal News