Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT's Observations on Environmental Clearance, Upholds Prosecution Conditions

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India set aside a portion of the National Green Tribunal's (NGT) judgment pertaining to the validity of environmental clearance for M/s Sweta Estate Pvt. Ltd., while upholding the decision to prosecute the company for violations of environmental norms.

The bench, comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Sanjay Karol, reviewed the appeal filed by M/s Sweta Estate Pvt. Ltd. against the NGT's order. The case revolved around the appellant's housing project in Gurgaon and their compliance with the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, and the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.

Justice Oka, in his judgment, stated, "Considering the limited scope of appeal, NGT ought not to have gone into the question of whether the construction carried out by the appellant between 9th April 2012 to 29th August 2017 was illegal." This statement led to the Supreme Court setting aside NGT's observations related to the expiration of the environmental clearance (EC) and the legality of the construction activities during this period.

Furthermore, the apex court confirmed NGT's decision regarding the conditions of the ex-post facto Consent to Establish (CTE) granted to the appellant. The court emphasized that "after having acted upon the ex-post facto CTE dated 18th October 2017, the appellant cannot be allowed to approbate and reprobate." This effectively means that the company must adhere to the prosecution conditions as per the ex-post facto CTE.

This ruling has significant implications for environmental law and corporate compliance in India. It underscores the importance of adhering to environmental norms and the consequences of non-compliance. The decision also clarifies the scope and limitations of appellate authorities in environmental matters.

The Supreme Court's decision brings a new dimension to the interpretation of environmental laws in India, particularly regarding the retrospective effect of compliance measures and the legal responsibilities of corporations in environmental preservation.

Date of Decision: 10 November 2023

M/s Sweta Estate Pvt.Ltd. Gurgaon VS Haryana State Pollution Control Board  & Anr.

Latest Legal News