MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Sets Aside Interim Stay on Investigation into Corruption Allegations Against Previous Andhra Pradesh Government

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justices M.R. Shah and M. M. Sundresh, has set aside the interim stay imposed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh on the investigation into corruption allegations against the previous government. The decision was made in Civil Appeal Nos. 8540-8541 of 2022, titled "State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. v. Varla Ramaiah etc."

The State Government of Andhra Pradesh had appointed a Cabinet Sub-Committee to examine allegations of corruption against members of the previous government. The Sub-Committee submitted an interim report recording prima facie findings and resolved to consider transferring the investigation to a central agency. Subsequently, the State set up a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to investigate the allegations, which was ratified by the Cabinet. The SIT requested that the matter be handed over to a central agency, such as the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The State Government also requested the Central Government to refer the matter to the CBI. The original writ petitioners challenged these government orders before the High Court, which granted an interim stay on further proceedings.

The Supreme Court, after hearing arguments from both sides, observed that the High Court had misinterpreted the government orders, wrongly assuming that they were aimed at overturning the decisions of the previous government. The Court clarified that the purpose of the orders was to inquire into allegations of corruption and not to review previous decisions. It further stated that the High Court should not have granted an interim stay at such an early stage of the matter, as the Central Government was yet to make a decision on referring the matter to the CBI. The Court directed the High Court to decide the pending writ petitions on their merits within three months, without being influenced by the observations made in its order.

The Supreme Court's decision to set aside the interim stay paves the way for the investigation into corruption allegations against the previous Andhra Pradesh government to proceed. The State Government had sought the involvement of a central agency, such as the CBI, to ensure an impartial and thorough investigation. With the interim stay lifted, the focus now shifts to the High Court, which has been directed to decide the pending writ petitions expeditiously. The addition of the Union of India as a respondent in the writ petitions will also play a crucial role in the further proceedings.

Date: May 3, 2023

The State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. VS Varla Ramaiah etc.

Latest Legal News