Kerala High Court Denies Relief To Petitioner Suppressing Facts, Orders Enquiry Into Allotment Of Govt Scheme Houses On Puramboke Land Candidate Missing Physical Test For Minor Illness Has No Enforceable Right To Rescheduling: Supreme Court Prolonged Incarceration And Parity Constitute Valid Grounds For Regular Bail: Supreme Court Accused In Cheque Bounce Cases Cannot File Evidence-In-Chief By Affidavit Under Section 145 NI Act: Orissa High Court Borrowers Have No Right To Personal Hearing Before Fraud Classification, But Full Forensic Audit Report Must Be Supplied: Supreme Court Pendency Of Matrimonial Dispute With General Allegations Not A Valid Ground To Deny Public Employment: Allahabad High Court Minimum Five Persons Mandatory To Prove 'Preparation For Dacoity' Under Section 399 IPC: Gujarat High Court Suit For Specific Performance Not Maintainable Without Prayer To Set Aside Termination Of Agreement: Madras High Court Trial Court Must Indicate Material Forming Basis Of Charge, Mechanical Framing Of Charges Impermissible: Madhya Pradesh High Court Voluntary Retirement Deemed Accepted If Positive Order Of Refusal Is Not Communicated Within Notice Period: Supreme Court Court Cannot Convict One Accused And Acquit Another On Same Evidence: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Convict Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Convict Due To Unreliable Last-Seen Evidence And Principle Of Parity 138 NI Act | Accused Cannot Rebut Presumption Of Legally Enforceable Debt At Pre-Trial Stage In Cheque Bounce Cases: Supreme Court More Meritorious PWD Candidates From Reserved Categories Can Claim Unreserved PWD Posts In Open Competition: Supreme Court Meritorious Reserved Candidates Can Claim Unreserved Horizontal Vacancies Based On Merit: Supreme Court Employee Not Entitled To Gratuity Until Conclusion Of Both Departmental And Criminal Proceedings: Supreme Court Stamp Duty Recovery Against Legal Heirs Is Strictly Limited To The Extent Of Inherited Estate: Allahabad High Court Single Lathi Blow On Head During Sudden Altercation Amounts To Culpable Homicide Under Section 304 Part II IPC, Not Murder: Madhya Pradesh High Court Habeas Corpus Maintainable For Child Custody Against Father; Cannot Be Dismissed Merely Due To Alternate Remedy: Allahabad High Court "Plea Of Ignorance In Digital Era Inexcusable": Punjab & Haryana HC Imposes Rs 10K Cost On Accused For Hiding Prior Bail Dismissal Discrepancies In Name And Age On Monthly Pass Fail To Establish 'Bona Fide Passenger' Status In Railway Accident Claim: Delhi High Court "Last Seen" Theory A Weak Link If Time Gap Is Wide: Bombay High Court Acquits Man Sentenced To Life For Murder Failure To Conduct Pre-Anaesthetic Check-Up Prima Facie Amounts To Gross Medical Negligence Under Section 304A IPC: Kerala High Court Gujarat High Court Bans AI From Judicial Decision-Making, Lays Down Strict Policy for Court Use of Artificial Intelligence

Supreme Court Sets Aside Interim Stay on Investigation into Corruption Allegations Against Previous Andhra Pradesh Government

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justices M.R. Shah and M. M. Sundresh, has set aside the interim stay imposed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh on the investigation into corruption allegations against the previous government. The decision was made in Civil Appeal Nos. 8540-8541 of 2022, titled "State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. v. Varla Ramaiah etc."

The State Government of Andhra Pradesh had appointed a Cabinet Sub-Committee to examine allegations of corruption against members of the previous government. The Sub-Committee submitted an interim report recording prima facie findings and resolved to consider transferring the investigation to a central agency. Subsequently, the State set up a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to investigate the allegations, which was ratified by the Cabinet. The SIT requested that the matter be handed over to a central agency, such as the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The State Government also requested the Central Government to refer the matter to the CBI. The original writ petitioners challenged these government orders before the High Court, which granted an interim stay on further proceedings.

The Supreme Court, after hearing arguments from both sides, observed that the High Court had misinterpreted the government orders, wrongly assuming that they were aimed at overturning the decisions of the previous government. The Court clarified that the purpose of the orders was to inquire into allegations of corruption and not to review previous decisions. It further stated that the High Court should not have granted an interim stay at such an early stage of the matter, as the Central Government was yet to make a decision on referring the matter to the CBI. The Court directed the High Court to decide the pending writ petitions on their merits within three months, without being influenced by the observations made in its order.

The Supreme Court's decision to set aside the interim stay paves the way for the investigation into corruption allegations against the previous Andhra Pradesh government to proceed. The State Government had sought the involvement of a central agency, such as the CBI, to ensure an impartial and thorough investigation. With the interim stay lifted, the focus now shifts to the High Court, which has been directed to decide the pending writ petitions expeditiously. The addition of the Union of India as a respondent in the writ petitions will also play a crucial role in the further proceedings.

Date: May 3, 2023

The State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. VS Varla Ramaiah etc.

Latest Legal News