Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Accused Not Entitled To Copies Of 'Unrelied' Upon Documents At The Stage Of Framing Of Charges Under Section 91 CrPC: Supreme Court Elected Representatives Have No Privilege To Resort To Violence; Criminal Antecedents Are Material For Bail Adjudication: Supreme Court Mere Absence Of Transport Documents Does Not Create A Presumption Of Violation Of Chhattisgarh Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act, 2004: Supreme Court Section 396 IPC | Conviction For 'Dacoity With Murder' Requires Proof That Murder Was Committed In The Course Of Dacoity: Allahabad High Court 'Developers Cannot Delay Conveyance For Eternity And Milk Additional FSI Benefits': Bombay High Court Upholds Societies' Deemed Conveyance Pre-Approval Statutory Dues Stand Extinguished Upon Approval Of Resolution Plan; GST Authorities Cannot Initiate Fresh Proceedings: Calcutta High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell With Delivery Of Possession Is Admissible In A Suit For Specific Performance: Delhi High Court Stigmatic Order Discharging Probationer Without Inquiry Is Void For Violation Of Natural Justice: Gujarat High Court Execution Proceedings | Court Cannot Impose Arbitrary Financial Conditions Without Reason In Stay Applications: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 528 BNSS | High Court Cannot Exercise Inherent Powers To Circumvent Statutory Bar Against Second Revision: Delhi High Court Advocate Empanelment | Restriction On Multiple Applications Is A Procedural Choice Within Employer’s Domain: Delhi High Court Acquittal Appeal | Double Presumption Of Innocence In Favour Of Accused Cannot Be Disturbed Merely Because Another View Is Possible: Gujarat High Court SC/ST Act | Offence Under Section 3(1)(g) Not Attracted If Dispossession Or Interference Is Not Due To Victim's Caste: Himachal Pradesh High Court Judicial Officer Must Maintain Distance From Practicing Advocates To Avoid Impropriety: Gujarat High Court Upholds Dismissal Section 183 BNSS | Investigating Officer Cannot Independently Record Further Statement Of Victim After Recording Before Magistrate: Karnataka High Court Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Supreme Court Sets Aside Interim Stay on Investigation into Corruption Allegations Against Previous Andhra Pradesh Government

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justices M.R. Shah and M. M. Sundresh, has set aside the interim stay imposed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh on the investigation into corruption allegations against the previous government. The decision was made in Civil Appeal Nos. 8540-8541 of 2022, titled "State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. v. Varla Ramaiah etc."

The State Government of Andhra Pradesh had appointed a Cabinet Sub-Committee to examine allegations of corruption against members of the previous government. The Sub-Committee submitted an interim report recording prima facie findings and resolved to consider transferring the investigation to a central agency. Subsequently, the State set up a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to investigate the allegations, which was ratified by the Cabinet. The SIT requested that the matter be handed over to a central agency, such as the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The State Government also requested the Central Government to refer the matter to the CBI. The original writ petitioners challenged these government orders before the High Court, which granted an interim stay on further proceedings.

The Supreme Court, after hearing arguments from both sides, observed that the High Court had misinterpreted the government orders, wrongly assuming that they were aimed at overturning the decisions of the previous government. The Court clarified that the purpose of the orders was to inquire into allegations of corruption and not to review previous decisions. It further stated that the High Court should not have granted an interim stay at such an early stage of the matter, as the Central Government was yet to make a decision on referring the matter to the CBI. The Court directed the High Court to decide the pending writ petitions on their merits within three months, without being influenced by the observations made in its order.

The Supreme Court's decision to set aside the interim stay paves the way for the investigation into corruption allegations against the previous Andhra Pradesh government to proceed. The State Government had sought the involvement of a central agency, such as the CBI, to ensure an impartial and thorough investigation. With the interim stay lifted, the focus now shifts to the High Court, which has been directed to decide the pending writ petitions expeditiously. The addition of the Union of India as a respondent in the writ petitions will also play a crucial role in the further proceedings.

Date: May 3, 2023

The State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. VS Varla Ramaiah etc.

Latest Legal News