Stamp Act | Agreements to Sell with Possession Clauses Are Conveyances and Must Be Stamped Separately: Supreme Court    |     Supreme Court Directs Immediate Implementation of Electronic Road Safety Monitoring Under Motor Vehicles Act    |     False Claims Shake Court's Trust in Legal Proceedings: Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Premature Release After False Statements on Imprisonment Duration    |     Executive Instructions Cannot Supplant Statutory Notifications: Bombay High Court Holds on Environmental Clearances    |     Illegal Mining Is Not a Scheduled Offence Under PMLA: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Arrest of MLA Surender Panwar    |     Customers Liable Under Section 370(A) IPC if They Knew Victims Were Trafficked: Telangana High Court    |     Literal Interpretation of Taxing Statute Cannot Frustrate The Legislative Intent To Promote Infrastructure Development: Calcutta High Court    |     Medical Evidence Reveals One Child Died 13 Hours After Accused’s Rescue: Kerala High Court Acquits Mother Convicted of Killing Her Children    |     Non-compliance with interim maintenance order cannot bar divorce proceedings: Orissa High Court    |     DNA Evidence Cannot Be the Sole Basis for Conviction Without Proper Chain of Custody: Bombay High Court Quashes Conviction in POCSO and Rape Case    |     Force Majeure Cannot Be Invoked Without Timely Notice: Madras High Court    |     Non-payment of Compensation for Over Four Decades Shocks Judicial Conscience: Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Compensation Recalculation for 42-Year    |     Madhya Pradesh High Court Upholds Retirement Age of 60 for Cement Workers, Grants Full Back Wages to Wrongfully Retired Workmen    |     Supreme Court Grants Bail to Tamil Nadu Ex-Minister V. Senthil Balaji in Corruption and Money Laundering Case    |     Courts Can Award Maintenance More Than Claimed Based on Income: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds ₹25,000 Maintenance    |     Mere Possession of Child Pornography with Intent Can Trigger POCSO Offences, Even Without Transmission: Supreme Court    |     Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Taxation Law | Issuing Notices to a Dead Person is a Fundamental Jurisdictional Error: Delhi HC Sets Aside Reassessment Proceedings    |     Common Intention Can Be Inferred from the Conduct of the Accused Moments Before the Act: Supreme Court    |     Supreme Court Grants Divorce by Mutual Consent, Quashes All Pending Cases in Matrimonial Dispute    |    

Supreme Court Scales Down Post-Award Interest Rate in Arbitration Case Involving Department of Women and Child Development

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant Order, the Supreme Court of India made a pivotal decision in the arbitration case between the Department of Women and Child Development of Karnataka and M/s Christy Friedgram Industry. The court, while upholding the main portions of the arbitral award, decided to scale down the post-award interest rate to nine percent per annum.

The dispute originated from the termination of agreements related to Mahila Supplementary Nutrition Production and Training Centres, which led to arbitration and subsequent legal challenges. The sole arbitrator had initially awarded a substantial sum of Rs. 1,66,47,31,962/- to M/s Christy Friedgram Industry, including various claims and accrued interests.

Both parties challenged the award in different capacities. While the challenges by the respondent were dismissed by the Commercial Court, High Court, and eventually by the Supreme Court, the petitioner’s independent challenge faced a setback due to the High Court’s refusal to condone a 225-day delay in filing the appeal.

The Supreme Court, in its order, emphasized the importance of adhering to legal timelines. “The explanation which was tendered on behalf of the State of Karnataka was clearly not sufficient for the purpose of condoning the delay,” the bench noted, underscoring the criticality of procedural diligence.

However, recognizing the efforts for an amicable resolution, the apex court intervened in the matter of interest rates. “Having considered the matter from all its perspectives, we are of the view that the post award interest as awarded by the arbitrator should be scaled down to nine per cent per annum,” the Court observed. This decision was made in light of mutual consent by both parties during the course of the hearing.

As a result of the court’s order, the petitioner has deposited the entire amount of the award with interest, following which a joint statement by the advocates of both parties will determine the exact amount due to the respondent post the modification of the interest rate.

Date of Decision: 20th November 2023

DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT VS M/S CHRISTY FRIEDGRAM INDUSTRY

Similar News