Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Supreme Court Scales Down Post-Award Interest Rate in Arbitration Case Involving Department of Women and Child Development

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant Order, the Supreme Court of India made a pivotal decision in the arbitration case between the Department of Women and Child Development of Karnataka and M/s Christy Friedgram Industry. The court, while upholding the main portions of the arbitral award, decided to scale down the post-award interest rate to nine percent per annum.

The dispute originated from the termination of agreements related to Mahila Supplementary Nutrition Production and Training Centres, which led to arbitration and subsequent legal challenges. The sole arbitrator had initially awarded a substantial sum of Rs. 1,66,47,31,962/- to M/s Christy Friedgram Industry, including various claims and accrued interests.

Both parties challenged the award in different capacities. While the challenges by the respondent were dismissed by the Commercial Court, High Court, and eventually by the Supreme Court, the petitioner’s independent challenge faced a setback due to the High Court’s refusal to condone a 225-day delay in filing the appeal.

The Supreme Court, in its order, emphasized the importance of adhering to legal timelines. “The explanation which was tendered on behalf of the State of Karnataka was clearly not sufficient for the purpose of condoning the delay,” the bench noted, underscoring the criticality of procedural diligence.

However, recognizing the efforts for an amicable resolution, the apex court intervened in the matter of interest rates. “Having considered the matter from all its perspectives, we are of the view that the post award interest as awarded by the arbitrator should be scaled down to nine per cent per annum,” the Court observed. This decision was made in light of mutual consent by both parties during the course of the hearing.

As a result of the court’s order, the petitioner has deposited the entire amount of the award with interest, following which a joint statement by the advocates of both parties will determine the exact amount due to the respondent post the modification of the interest rate.

Date of Decision: 20th November 2023

DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT VS M/S CHRISTY FRIEDGRAM INDUSTRY

Latest Legal News