Prosecution Cannot Fill Gaps In Circumstantial Evidence Merely Because Delivery Occurred Inside Private Bathroom: Kerala High Court Acquits Mother In Infanticide Case Mere Presence And Possession Of Stick Cannot Establish Common Intention To Commit Murder Without Proof Of Functional Relationship: Allahabad High Court Gravity Of Offence Cannot Be Perpetual Bar To Remission: Delhi High Court Consensual Relationship Spanning Years Cannot Be Turned Into Rape Charge Merely Because Stock Market Investments Soured: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail PMLA | Properties Acquired Before Predicate Offence Can Be Attached As 'Equivalent Value' Of Proceeds Of Crime: Kerala High Court Writ Jurisdiction Not A Panacea For Deep-Seated Civil Controversies; Title Disputes Must Be Decided By Civil Courts: Madras High Court Mere Request For Agreement In Reply To Legal Notice Cannot Be Construed As Acknowledgment Of Debt To Save Limitation: Madhya Pradesh High Court Orissa High Court Clarifies Exclusion Of Time Under Limitation Act Applies To Election Appeals Under Gram Panchayats Act Despite Statute Being Self-Contained Code Filing Of Complaint After Offer Of Possession Indicates Unit Was Incomplete; Purely Factual Disputes Don't Raise Substantial Question Of Law: Punjab & Haryana HC Absence Of Corroborative Medical Evidence Cannot Override Victim's Statement Under BNSS In Rape And POCSO Cases: Allahabad High Court Victim Has Absolute Right To Appeal Against Acquittal Under Section 372 CrPC, Need Not Seek Special Leave Under Section 378(4): Punjab & Haryana High Court 'MODERN MANAGERS NEED NOT HIRE OR FIRE TO BE EXCLUDED FROM WORKMAN DEFINITION': Bombay High Court

Supreme Court Scales Down Post-Award Interest Rate in Arbitration Case Involving Department of Women and Child Development

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant Order, the Supreme Court of India made a pivotal decision in the arbitration case between the Department of Women and Child Development of Karnataka and M/s Christy Friedgram Industry. The court, while upholding the main portions of the arbitral award, decided to scale down the post-award interest rate to nine percent per annum.

The dispute originated from the termination of agreements related to Mahila Supplementary Nutrition Production and Training Centres, which led to arbitration and subsequent legal challenges. The sole arbitrator had initially awarded a substantial sum of Rs. 1,66,47,31,962/- to M/s Christy Friedgram Industry, including various claims and accrued interests.

Both parties challenged the award in different capacities. While the challenges by the respondent were dismissed by the Commercial Court, High Court, and eventually by the Supreme Court, the petitioner’s independent challenge faced a setback due to the High Court’s refusal to condone a 225-day delay in filing the appeal.

The Supreme Court, in its order, emphasized the importance of adhering to legal timelines. “The explanation which was tendered on behalf of the State of Karnataka was clearly not sufficient for the purpose of condoning the delay,” the bench noted, underscoring the criticality of procedural diligence.

However, recognizing the efforts for an amicable resolution, the apex court intervened in the matter of interest rates. “Having considered the matter from all its perspectives, we are of the view that the post award interest as awarded by the arbitrator should be scaled down to nine per cent per annum,” the Court observed. This decision was made in light of mutual consent by both parties during the course of the hearing.

As a result of the court’s order, the petitioner has deposited the entire amount of the award with interest, following which a joint statement by the advocates of both parties will determine the exact amount due to the respondent post the modification of the interest rate.

Date of Decision: 20th November 2023

DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT VS M/S CHRISTY FRIEDGRAM INDUSTRY

Latest Legal News