Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Supreme Court Rejects Claim of Adoption and Will in Property Dispute: “Multiplicity of Suspicious Circumstances” Undermines Legitimacy

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India, in the case of Moturu Nalini Kanth vs. Gainedi Kaliprasad (dead through LRs.), dismissed the appeal of Moturu Nalini Kanth, who claimed rights over properties based on a contested Will and Adoption Deed. The judgment, delivered by Justices C.T. Ravikumar and Sanjay Kumar, highlighted “a multitude of suspicious circumstances” surrounding the alleged adoption and the execution of the will.

The apex court meticulously examined the evidence surrounding the Adoption Deed (Ex. A9) and Will (Ex. A10) of the late Venkubayamma. The Bench noted that despite the registration of Ex. A9 Adoption Deed, its authenticity was successfully challenged by the respondent. “The very adoption, itself, is not believable, given the multitude of suspicious circumstances surrounding it,” the judgment stated, casting doubt on the legal processes claimed to have been followed in the adoption of Nalini Kanth.

Furthermore, the judgment scrutinized the execution of the Will (Ex. A10). The Court pointed out significant inconsistencies in the testimony of witnesses and the documentation of the Will. It was observed that the Will was not proved in accordance with the law, thereby nullifying its legal standing. The Court remarked, “In effect, Ex. A10 Will was not proved in accordance with law and it can have no legal consequence.”

This decision affirms the stance of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, which had earlier ruled against Nalini Kanth. The Supreme Court’s observation emphasizes the importance of adhering to the legal requirements in matters of wills and adoptions, underlining the necessity of clear, consistent, and credible evidence to uphold such claims. The judgment serves as a precedent in cases involving disputes over wills and adoptions, reinforcing the rigorous standards required for their validation.

Date of Decision: 20th November 2023

MOTURU NALINI KANTH VS GAINEDI KALIPRASAD (DEAD, THROUGH LRS.) 

Latest Legal News