-
by sayum
09 February 2026 9:41 AM
In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has quashed a conviction under the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), citing a "serious doubt about the prosecution's case that substance recovered was a contraband".
The appellant, Simarnjit Singh, who was convicted for possession of poppy husk, had his sentence overturned after the Apex Court ruled that the procedure for drawing samples of the seized substance did not conform to the law.
The two-judge bench, consisting of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal, examined the procedure of drawing samples, as outlined in Section 52A(2) of the NDPS Act, and found it was not adhered to in this case. They pointed out that samples were drawn immediately after the seizure, which was contrary to the prescribed process.
Quoting from their judgment, the court held, "The act of drawing samples from all the packets at the time seizure is not in conformity with the law laid down by this Court. This creates a serious doubt about the prosecution's case." This decision relied heavily on a previous Supreme Court case, Union of India v. Mohanlal & Anr, which emphasised that samples should be drawn in the presence and under the supervision of the Magistrate.
With this verdict, the court has underscored the importance of strict adherence to the procedural aspects of the law, highlighting that any lapses could cast serious doubt on the prosecution's case.
"Hence, the case of the prosecution is not free from suspicion and the same has not been established beyond a reasonable doubt," the court stated, setting aside the earlier conviction.
Following this judgment, the accused, Simarnjit Singh, has been freed of his conviction and sentence, reinforcing the principle that the prosecution's case must be watertight and established beyond a reasonable doubt to hold up in a court of law.
Date of Decision: May 9, 2023
SIMARNJIT SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB
