MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Judgment in Property Inheritance Case: “No Perversity in Findings”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment dated November 6, 2023, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justices B.R. Gavai, Hima Kohli, and Prashant Kumar Mishra, has partially modified a High Court ruling concerning the inheritance of joint family property under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The apex court observed that there was “no perversity in the findings” by the High Court, which had determined the status of the disputed properties as joint family assets.

The civil appeal, brought forth by the second defendant posthumously through his legal representatives, challenged the High Court’s decision that had partially allowed a regular second appeal by the plaintiff, granting her a 1/7th share in the ‘B’, ‘C’, and ‘C1’ schedule properties after the demise of her husband and mother-in-law.

Upon reviewing the evidence and judgments from the lower courts, the Supreme Court found no issues with the High Court’s conclusion that all the suit properties were indeed joint family properties. However, the apex court corrected the legal interpretation concerning the devolution of the deceased mother-in-law’s share. The judgment clarified that the plaintiff, as the widow of a pre-deceased son, is not entitled to the first right to her mother-in-law’s share in the properties.

The Supreme Court’s decision reaffirms the intricate nuances of the Hindu Succession Act, emphasizing the proper application of Sections 15 and 16 in property devolution. This judgment is poised to serve as a precedent for future cases involving the succession and inheritance rights of female Hindus.

Date of Decision: November 06, 2023

SACHIDHANANDAM VS E. VANAJA AND ORS.

Latest Legal News