CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Supreme Court Mandates Phasing Out of Diesel Vehicles at ICD Tughlakabad to Combat Delhi NCR Pollution

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment yesterday, the Supreme Court of India upheld environmental concerns by directing the phased reduction of diesel vehicles at the Inland Container Depot (ICD) in Tughlakabad. This decision comes as a significant step in addressing the chronic air pollution issues plaguing the Delhi National Capital Region (NCR).

The bench, led by Justice Abhay S. Oka, passed the judgment in the civil appeal filed by the Container Corporation of India Ltd. Against the National Green Tribunal’s (NGT) earlier order. The NGT had called for a shift from diesel to electric, hybrid, and CNG vehicles at the ICD to mitigate pollution levels.

Justice Oka, emphasizing the gravity of the situation, stated, “Air pollution directly affects the fundamental rights of the citizens guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.” He further added, “The right to life guaranteed under Article 21 includes the right to live in a pollution-free environment.”

The Supreme Court's directive aligns with the recommendations of the Environment Pollution (Prevention and Control) Authority (EPCA), which underscored the pressing need to shift to cleaner fuel sources. The judgment stipulates the formulation of a policy for phasing out heavy-duty diesel vehicles and replacing them with BS-VI vehicles by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways within six months.

In addition to vehicle pollution, the judgment also addressed the issue of underutilization of other ICDs around Delhi. The Court directed the appellant to formulate a comprehensive plan to optimize the use of these depots, potentially easing the burden on the Tughlakabad facility.

The judgment also highlighted the need for improved parking management at the said ICD. Acknowledging a report by KPMG on this issue, the Court granted six months to the appellant to implement recommended measures.

In a move to ensure strict compliance, the Supreme Court has decided to monitor the implementation of its directives, with a compliance report due on July 31, 2024.

This judgment represents a critical step towards improving air quality in the Delhi NCR, offering hope for a cleaner, healthier future for its residents.

Date of Decision: January 11, 2024

Container Corporation of India Ltd. vs Ajay Khera & Ors.

 

Latest Legal News