Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Once a Court Declares a Department an Industry Under Section 2(j), State Cannot Raise the Same Objection Again: Gujarat High Court Slams Repetitive Litigation by Irrigation Department “How Could Cheques Issued in 2020 Be Mentioned in a 2019 Contract?”: Delhi High Court Grants Injunction in Forged MOA Case, Slams Prima Facie Fabrication Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC Sole Testimony of Prosecutrix, If Credible, Is Enough to Convict: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Cheque Issued as Security Still Attracts Section 138 NI Act If Liability Exists on Date of Presentation: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity Law of Limitation Binds All Equally, Including the State: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Review Petition with 5743 Days’ Delay Once Selected, All Are Equals: Allahabad High Court Slams State for Withholding Pay Protection From Later Batches of Ex-Servicemen Constables Non-Compliance With Section 42 of NDPS Act Is Fatal to Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court Acquits Two Accused In 160 Kg Poppy Husk Case Unregistered Agreement Creating Right of Way Inadmissible in Evidence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Summary Decree in Partition Suit Denied: Unequivocal Admissions Absent, Full Trial Necessary: Delhi High Court No Court Can Allow Itself to Be Used as an Instrument of Fraud: Delhi High Court Exposes Forged Writ Petition Filed in Name of Unaware Citizen "Deliberate Wage Splitting to Evade Provident Fund Dues Is Illegal": Bombay High Court Restores PF Authority's 7A Order Against Saket College and Centrum Direct Anti-Suit Injunction in Matrimonial Dispute Set Aside: Calcutta High Court Refuses to Stall UK Divorce Proceedings Filed by Wife

Supreme Court Issues Strict Orders on Unauthorized Tree Felling by DDA in Delhi Ridge Area

05 November 2024 2:01 PM

By: sayum


DDA Must Account for Unauthorized Felling of Over 1,100 Trees and Undertake Restoration Measures. The Supreme Court of India has issued detailed and stern directives to the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and its Chairperson following unauthorized tree felling in Delhi's protected Ridge area. In response to contempt petitions, the Court has demanded a full account of the ecological damage caused, disciplinary action against responsible officials, and a comprehensive plan for restoration and remediation. This order follows DDA's apparent violation of prior Supreme Court orders prohibiting any felling or construction in the Ridge without requisite permissions.

The case stems from long-standing public interest litigation regarding forest conservation, including the protection of the Ridge area in Delhi. In orders passed on February 8, 2023 and March 4, 2024, the Supreme Court had directed that no land allotment or tree felling should occur in the Ridge area without explicit approval. Despite this, a Central Empowered Committee (CEC) report revealed that the DDA proceeded with unauthorized felling of over 1,100 trees for road construction near the Ridge, violating the court's directives.

Accountability and Disciplinary Actions

  1. Identification of Responsible Officials: The Court has mandated that the DDA Chairperson identify officers responsible for unauthorized tree felling and for failing to obtain the Court’s permission before commencing the project.
  2. Disciplinary and Criminal Action: The Court has urged the Chairperson to initiate disciplinary proceedings and criminal prosecution against officials involved in the contemptuous acts without waiting for further court orders.

Detailed Affidavit from DDA Chairperson

The Chairperson of the DDA has been directed to file a personal compliance affidavit addressing the following points by October 22, 2024:

  • Knowledge and Approval: Clarification on whether the Chairperson was informed during a site visit on February 3, 2024 about the need for Court approval for tree felling and, if so, what steps were taken to obtain such permission.
  • Remediation Measures: A detailed plan for ecological restoration and mitigation of damage caused by unauthorized tree felling.
  • Timber Accountability: An inventory of the felled trees, and the method by which the timber was managed or disposed of.

Restoration and Remediation Efforts

The Court emphasized the need for a time-bound restoration plan to mitigate the environmental damage. The DDA has been directed to submit a remediation plan, including reforestation and soil restoration measures, to address the ecological impact of the unauthorized activities.

Role of Expert Committee

The Court has ordered the submission of a final report from an Expert Committee (constituted per its June 26, 2024, order) to assess the environmental impact of the project and provide recommendations on restoration. This report is expected by the next hearing date.

Observations and Reprimands by the Court

The Supreme Court expressed its strong disapproval of the DDA’s conduct, particularly noting that:

  • The DDA began tree felling even before filing an application for permission, which was subsequently rejected.
  • Misleading information may have been presented to the Chairperson of DDA, influencing their decision to authorize the road-widening project.
  • The actions of DDA officials reflect a blatant disregard for the Court’s environmental protection orders, which it described as “shocking” and warranting severe accountability measures.

Next Hearing and Compliance Review

The case is scheduled for a further hearing on October 22, 2024, during which the Court will review:

  • The compliance affidavit from the DDA Chairperson.
  • The final report of the Expert Committee on ecological impact.
  • Any disciplinary actions or criminal proceedings initiated against responsible officials.

The Supreme Court has reiterated that any future violations of its orders regarding environmental protections in the Ridge area will be met with stringent legal consequences, underscoring its commitment to preserving Delhi’s ecological balance.

  • Date of Order: October 16, 2024

Latest Legal News