Trademark Pirates Face Legal Wrath: Delhi HC Enforces Radio Mirchi’s IP Rights Swiftly Madras High Court Upholds Extended Adjudication Period Under Customs Act Amid Allegations of Systemic Lapses Disputes Over Religious Office Will Be Consolidated for Efficient Adjudication, Holds Karnataka High Court Motive Alone, Without Corroborative Evidence, Insufficient for Conviction : High Court Acquits Accused in 1993 Murder Case Himachal Pradesh HC Criticizes State for Delays: Orders Timely Action on Employee Grievances Calls for Pragmatic Approach to Desertion and Cruelty in Divorce Cases: Calcutta High Court Orders Fresh Trial Juvenile Tried as Adult: Bombay High Court Validates JJB Decision, Modifies Sentence to 7 Years Retrospective Application of Amended Rules for Redeployment Declared Invalid: Orissa High Court NDPS Act Leaves No Room for Leniency: HC Requires Substantial Proof of Innocence for Bail No Protection Without Performance: MP High Court Denies Relief Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act Delays in processing applications for premature release cannot deprive convicts of interim relief: Karnataka High Court Grants 90-Day Parole Listing All Appeals Arising From A Common Judgment Before The Same Bench Avoids Contradictory Rulings: Full Bench of the Patna High Court. Age Claims in Borderline Cases Demand Scrutiny: Madhya Pradesh HC on Juvenile Justice Act Bishop Garden Not Available for Partition Due to Legal Quietus on Declaration Suit: Madras High Court Exclusion of Certain Heirs Alone Does Not Make a Will Suspicious: Kerala High Court Upholds Validity of Will Proof of Delivery Was Never Requested, Nor Was it a Payment Precondition: Delhi High Court Held Courier Firm Entitled to Payment Despite Non-Delivery Allegations Widowed Daughter Eligible for Compassionate Appointment under BSNL Scheme: Allahabad High Court Brutality of an Offence Does Not Dispense With Legal Proof: Supreme Court Overturns Life Imprisonment of Two Accused Marumakkathayam Law | Partition Is An Act By Which The Nature Of The Property Is Changed, Reflecting An Alteration In Ownership: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claim | Compensation Must Aim To Restore, As Far As Possible, What Has Been Irretrievably Lost: Supreme Court Awards Rs. 1.02 Crore Personal Criticism Of Judges Or Recording Findings On Their Conduct In Judgments Must Be Avoided: Supreme Court Efficiency In Arbitral Proceedings Is Integral To Effective Dispute Resolution. Courts Must Ensure That Arbitral Processes Reach Their Logical End: Supreme Court Onus Lies On The Propounder To Remove All Suspicious Circumstances Surrounding A Will To The Satisfaction Of The Court: Calcutta High Court Deeds of Gift Not Governed by Section 22-B of Registration Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Testimony Of  Injured Witness Carries A Built-In Guarantee Of Truthfulness: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempted Murder POCSO | Conviction Cannot Be Sustained Without Conclusive Proof Of Minority - Burden Lies On The Prosecution: Telangana High Court Credible Eyewitness Account, Supported By Forensic Corroboration, Creates An Unassailable Chain Of Proof That Withstands Scrutiny: Punjab and Haryana High Court Jammu & Kashmir High Court Grants Bail to Schizophrenic Mother Accused of Murdering Infant Son

Supreme Court Issues Strict Orders on Unauthorized Tree Felling by DDA in Delhi Ridge Area

05 November 2024 2:01 PM

By: sayum


DDA Must Account for Unauthorized Felling of Over 1,100 Trees and Undertake Restoration Measures. The Supreme Court of India has issued detailed and stern directives to the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and its Chairperson following unauthorized tree felling in Delhi's protected Ridge area. In response to contempt petitions, the Court has demanded a full account of the ecological damage caused, disciplinary action against responsible officials, and a comprehensive plan for restoration and remediation. This order follows DDA's apparent violation of prior Supreme Court orders prohibiting any felling or construction in the Ridge without requisite permissions.

The case stems from long-standing public interest litigation regarding forest conservation, including the protection of the Ridge area in Delhi. In orders passed on February 8, 2023 and March 4, 2024, the Supreme Court had directed that no land allotment or tree felling should occur in the Ridge area without explicit approval. Despite this, a Central Empowered Committee (CEC) report revealed that the DDA proceeded with unauthorized felling of over 1,100 trees for road construction near the Ridge, violating the court's directives.

Accountability and Disciplinary Actions

  1. Identification of Responsible Officials: The Court has mandated that the DDA Chairperson identify officers responsible for unauthorized tree felling and for failing to obtain the Court’s permission before commencing the project.
  2. Disciplinary and Criminal Action: The Court has urged the Chairperson to initiate disciplinary proceedings and criminal prosecution against officials involved in the contemptuous acts without waiting for further court orders.

Detailed Affidavit from DDA Chairperson

The Chairperson of the DDA has been directed to file a personal compliance affidavit addressing the following points by October 22, 2024:

  • Knowledge and Approval: Clarification on whether the Chairperson was informed during a site visit on February 3, 2024 about the need for Court approval for tree felling and, if so, what steps were taken to obtain such permission.
  • Remediation Measures: A detailed plan for ecological restoration and mitigation of damage caused by unauthorized tree felling.
  • Timber Accountability: An inventory of the felled trees, and the method by which the timber was managed or disposed of.

Restoration and Remediation Efforts

The Court emphasized the need for a time-bound restoration plan to mitigate the environmental damage. The DDA has been directed to submit a remediation plan, including reforestation and soil restoration measures, to address the ecological impact of the unauthorized activities.

Role of Expert Committee

The Court has ordered the submission of a final report from an Expert Committee (constituted per its June 26, 2024, order) to assess the environmental impact of the project and provide recommendations on restoration. This report is expected by the next hearing date.

Observations and Reprimands by the Court

The Supreme Court expressed its strong disapproval of the DDA’s conduct, particularly noting that:

  • The DDA began tree felling even before filing an application for permission, which was subsequently rejected.
  • Misleading information may have been presented to the Chairperson of DDA, influencing their decision to authorize the road-widening project.
  • The actions of DDA officials reflect a blatant disregard for the Court’s environmental protection orders, which it described as “shocking” and warranting severe accountability measures.

Next Hearing and Compliance Review

The case is scheduled for a further hearing on October 22, 2024, during which the Court will review:

  • The compliance affidavit from the DDA Chairperson.
  • The final report of the Expert Committee on ecological impact.
  • Any disciplinary actions or criminal proceedings initiated against responsible officials.

The Supreme Court has reiterated that any future violations of its orders regarding environmental protections in the Ridge area will be met with stringent legal consequences, underscoring its commitment to preserving Delhi’s ecological balance.

  • Date of Order: October 16, 2024

Similar News