Conviction Under Section 409 IPC Postulates Strict Proof Of Entrustment; Suspicion However Grave Cannot Substitute Proof: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Emanating From Past Matrimonial Relationship Ought Not To Linger After Divorce: Supreme Court Negligence Of Previous Counsel Not A Ground To Reopen Concluded Pre-Charge Evidence Under Section 311 CrPC: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell Cannot Protect Tenant's Possession Under Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Registered Sale Deeds Admissible As Secondary Evidence Without Proving Loss Of Original: Gauhati High Court Counsel Representing Deceased Party Must Inform Court Of Death Under Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC: J&K High Court Son Staying In Father's House Out Of Love And Affection Is A Mere Licensee, Cannot Challenge Father's Title: Delhi High Court Conviction For Murder Cannot Stand Where Single Blow Inflicted In Sudden Fight Without Premeditation: Uttarakhand High Court Inability To Trace Suppliers Or Buyers No Ground For Custodial Interrogation Once Recovery Is Effected: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Assemble Peacefully To Celebrate Association Anniversary Is A Fundamental Right; Unlawful Assembly Per Se Not An Offence: Madras High Court Marriage Photographs Can Be Relied Upon To Estimate Quantity Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes: Kerala High Court POCSO Act Not Confined To Securing Convictions, Soul Of Law Lies In Preserving Childhood Dignity & Healing: Madras High Court Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court

Supreme Court Halts HC's Commissioner Appointment in Krishna Janmabhoomi Dispute, Citing 'Vague' Application Concerns"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Supreme Court has put a pause on the Allahabad High Court's decision to appoint a commissioner to inspect the Shahi Eidgah Mosque in the Krishna Janmabhoomi dispute. This interim order was passed today by a bench comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta.

The apex court's intervention came while responding to a special leave petition filed by the mosque committee, challenging the Allahabad High Court's December 14 order. The High Court had previously allowed an application for the appointment of a court commissioner to inspect the mosque, a move that has now been stayed by the Supreme Court.

During the proceedings, Advocate Tasneem Ahmadi, representing the Mosque Committee, argued against the High Court's decision, citing the pending application seeking rejection of the suit under the Places of Worship Act 1991. Emphasizing the significance of this legal point, Justice Khanna of the Supreme Court observed, "There are legal issues that arise. That apart, the application for local commissioner is very vague. Can an application be made like this? ...We are staying the operation of the impugned order to the extent of the commission being executed."

Senior Advocate Shyam Divan, representing the plaintiffs, opposed the stay. However, the court remained firm on its stance regarding the vague nature of the application. "You have to be very clear what you want the local commissioner to do," Justice Khanna added, highlighting the need for clarity in legal applications.

This stay order has temporarily halted the proceedings at the Allahabad High Court, with the Supreme Court noting that the legal issues, including those raised in the judgment of Asma Lateef, need consideration. The matter is set for a return hearing on January 23, 2024.

The controversy at the heart of this legal battle revolves around the Shahi Eidgah Mosque in Mathura, which is alleged to have been built after demolishing a temple at the birthplace of Lord Krishna.

Committee of Management, Trust Shahi Masjid Idgah v. Bhagwan Shri Krishna Virajman & Ors.

 

Latest Legal News