UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Supreme Court Halts HC's Commissioner Appointment in Krishna Janmabhoomi Dispute, Citing 'Vague' Application Concerns"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Supreme Court has put a pause on the Allahabad High Court's decision to appoint a commissioner to inspect the Shahi Eidgah Mosque in the Krishna Janmabhoomi dispute. This interim order was passed today by a bench comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta.

The apex court's intervention came while responding to a special leave petition filed by the mosque committee, challenging the Allahabad High Court's December 14 order. The High Court had previously allowed an application for the appointment of a court commissioner to inspect the mosque, a move that has now been stayed by the Supreme Court.

During the proceedings, Advocate Tasneem Ahmadi, representing the Mosque Committee, argued against the High Court's decision, citing the pending application seeking rejection of the suit under the Places of Worship Act 1991. Emphasizing the significance of this legal point, Justice Khanna of the Supreme Court observed, "There are legal issues that arise. That apart, the application for local commissioner is very vague. Can an application be made like this? ...We are staying the operation of the impugned order to the extent of the commission being executed."

Senior Advocate Shyam Divan, representing the plaintiffs, opposed the stay. However, the court remained firm on its stance regarding the vague nature of the application. "You have to be very clear what you want the local commissioner to do," Justice Khanna added, highlighting the need for clarity in legal applications.

This stay order has temporarily halted the proceedings at the Allahabad High Court, with the Supreme Court noting that the legal issues, including those raised in the judgment of Asma Lateef, need consideration. The matter is set for a return hearing on January 23, 2024.

The controversy at the heart of this legal battle revolves around the Shahi Eidgah Mosque in Mathura, which is alleged to have been built after demolishing a temple at the birthplace of Lord Krishna.

Committee of Management, Trust Shahi Masjid Idgah v. Bhagwan Shri Krishna Virajman & Ors.

 

Latest Legal News