Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

Supreme Court Grants Relief in Landmark Extension of Limitation Case Amidst Pandemic

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has provided relief to litigants by extending the period of limitation amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. The judgment, delivered on October 3, 2023, in the case of Aditya Khaitan & Ors. vs. IL and FS Financial Services Limited, highlights the Court's commitment to safeguarding the rights of parties during these challenging times.

Key Observations from the Judgment:

"The law assists those who are vigilant, not those who sleep over their rights is a fundamental legal maxim on which statutes of limitations are premised."

"When the whole world was in the grip of a devastating pandemic, it could never have been said that the parties were sleeping over their rights."

 "The extraordinary situation was dealt with rightly by extraordinary orders protecting the rights of parties by ensuring that their remedies and defenses were not barred."

 "The orders of this Court dated 08.03.2021 and subsequent orders extended the period for computing outer limits within which delay can be condoned."

In this case, the appellants sought an extension of time to file their written statements in response to a suit for recovery of money due to the impact of the pandemic. The High Court had denied their request, citing the expiration of the limitation period.

However, the Supreme Court, drawing on its orders dated 08.03.2021 and subsequent orders passed in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, concluded that the appellants' applications were well within the extended time frame. The Court emphasized the importance of these orders in protecting the rights of litigants during extraordinary circumstances.

This decision underscores the Court's commitment to ensuring access to justice during challenging times. It highlights the need for flexibility in extending the limitation period, especially in cases where the pandemic has disrupted normal legal proceedings.

The ruling in Aditya Khaitan & Ors. vs. IL and FS Financial Services Limited will have far-reaching implications for litigants across the country, reaffirming the principle that justice should not be denied due to circumstances beyond one's control.

The judgment serves as a reminder of the Court's responsibility to adapt to exceptional situations and protect the rights of individuals, even in the face of unforeseen challenges.

Date of Decision: October 3, 2023

Aditya Khaitan & Ors. vs IL and FS Financial Services Limited

                    

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/03-Oct-2023_Aditya_Vs_IL_and_FS_Financial_Serv.pdf"]

Latest Legal News