Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Relief in Landmark Extension of Limitation Case Amidst Pandemic

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has provided relief to litigants by extending the period of limitation amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. The judgment, delivered on October 3, 2023, in the case of Aditya Khaitan & Ors. vs. IL and FS Financial Services Limited, highlights the Court's commitment to safeguarding the rights of parties during these challenging times.

Key Observations from the Judgment:

"The law assists those who are vigilant, not those who sleep over their rights is a fundamental legal maxim on which statutes of limitations are premised."

"When the whole world was in the grip of a devastating pandemic, it could never have been said that the parties were sleeping over their rights."

 "The extraordinary situation was dealt with rightly by extraordinary orders protecting the rights of parties by ensuring that their remedies and defenses were not barred."

 "The orders of this Court dated 08.03.2021 and subsequent orders extended the period for computing outer limits within which delay can be condoned."

In this case, the appellants sought an extension of time to file their written statements in response to a suit for recovery of money due to the impact of the pandemic. The High Court had denied their request, citing the expiration of the limitation period.

However, the Supreme Court, drawing on its orders dated 08.03.2021 and subsequent orders passed in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, concluded that the appellants' applications were well within the extended time frame. The Court emphasized the importance of these orders in protecting the rights of litigants during extraordinary circumstances.

This decision underscores the Court's commitment to ensuring access to justice during challenging times. It highlights the need for flexibility in extending the limitation period, especially in cases where the pandemic has disrupted normal legal proceedings.

The ruling in Aditya Khaitan & Ors. vs. IL and FS Financial Services Limited will have far-reaching implications for litigants across the country, reaffirming the principle that justice should not be denied due to circumstances beyond one's control.

The judgment serves as a reminder of the Court's responsibility to adapt to exceptional situations and protect the rights of individuals, even in the face of unforeseen challenges.

Date of Decision: October 3, 2023

Aditya Khaitan & Ors. vs IL and FS Financial Services Limited

                    

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/03-Oct-2023_Aditya_Vs_IL_and_FS_Financial_Serv.pdf"]

Latest Legal News