Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Litigation Policy is Not Law, Can’t Enforce Guidelines Through Courts: Rajasthan High Court Refuses to Entertain Quo Warranto Against Additional Advocate General’s Appointment Police and Lawyers Are Two Limbs of Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Police Misconduct Incident Sole Testimony, Forensic Gaps, and Withheld Witness: No Conviction Possible: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Murder Trial Remand Keeps the Dispute Alive – Not Arrears: Bombay High Court Holds SVLDRS Relief Must Be Computed Under Litigation Category Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case

Supreme Court Grants Relief in Landmark Extension of Limitation Case Amidst Pandemic

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has provided relief to litigants by extending the period of limitation amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. The judgment, delivered on October 3, 2023, in the case of Aditya Khaitan & Ors. vs. IL and FS Financial Services Limited, highlights the Court's commitment to safeguarding the rights of parties during these challenging times.

Key Observations from the Judgment:

"The law assists those who are vigilant, not those who sleep over their rights is a fundamental legal maxim on which statutes of limitations are premised."

"When the whole world was in the grip of a devastating pandemic, it could never have been said that the parties were sleeping over their rights."

 "The extraordinary situation was dealt with rightly by extraordinary orders protecting the rights of parties by ensuring that their remedies and defenses were not barred."

 "The orders of this Court dated 08.03.2021 and subsequent orders extended the period for computing outer limits within which delay can be condoned."

In this case, the appellants sought an extension of time to file their written statements in response to a suit for recovery of money due to the impact of the pandemic. The High Court had denied their request, citing the expiration of the limitation period.

However, the Supreme Court, drawing on its orders dated 08.03.2021 and subsequent orders passed in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, concluded that the appellants' applications were well within the extended time frame. The Court emphasized the importance of these orders in protecting the rights of litigants during extraordinary circumstances.

This decision underscores the Court's commitment to ensuring access to justice during challenging times. It highlights the need for flexibility in extending the limitation period, especially in cases where the pandemic has disrupted normal legal proceedings.

The ruling in Aditya Khaitan & Ors. vs. IL and FS Financial Services Limited will have far-reaching implications for litigants across the country, reaffirming the principle that justice should not be denied due to circumstances beyond one's control.

The judgment serves as a reminder of the Court's responsibility to adapt to exceptional situations and protect the rights of individuals, even in the face of unforeseen challenges.

Date of Decision: October 3, 2023

Aditya Khaitan & Ors. vs IL and FS Financial Services Limited

                    

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/03-Oct-2023_Aditya_Vs_IL_and_FS_Financial_Serv.pdf"]

Latest Legal News