Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Grants Relief in Landmark Extension of Limitation Case Amidst Pandemic

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has provided relief to litigants by extending the period of limitation amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. The judgment, delivered on October 3, 2023, in the case of Aditya Khaitan & Ors. vs. IL and FS Financial Services Limited, highlights the Court's commitment to safeguarding the rights of parties during these challenging times.

Key Observations from the Judgment:

"The law assists those who are vigilant, not those who sleep over their rights is a fundamental legal maxim on which statutes of limitations are premised."

"When the whole world was in the grip of a devastating pandemic, it could never have been said that the parties were sleeping over their rights."

 "The extraordinary situation was dealt with rightly by extraordinary orders protecting the rights of parties by ensuring that their remedies and defenses were not barred."

 "The orders of this Court dated 08.03.2021 and subsequent orders extended the period for computing outer limits within which delay can be condoned."

In this case, the appellants sought an extension of time to file their written statements in response to a suit for recovery of money due to the impact of the pandemic. The High Court had denied their request, citing the expiration of the limitation period.

However, the Supreme Court, drawing on its orders dated 08.03.2021 and subsequent orders passed in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, concluded that the appellants' applications were well within the extended time frame. The Court emphasized the importance of these orders in protecting the rights of litigants during extraordinary circumstances.

This decision underscores the Court's commitment to ensuring access to justice during challenging times. It highlights the need for flexibility in extending the limitation period, especially in cases where the pandemic has disrupted normal legal proceedings.

The ruling in Aditya Khaitan & Ors. vs. IL and FS Financial Services Limited will have far-reaching implications for litigants across the country, reaffirming the principle that justice should not be denied due to circumstances beyond one's control.

The judgment serves as a reminder of the Court's responsibility to adapt to exceptional situations and protect the rights of individuals, even in the face of unforeseen challenges.

Date of Decision: October 3, 2023

Aditya Khaitan & Ors. vs IL and FS Financial Services Limited

                    

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/03-Oct-2023_Aditya_Vs_IL_and_FS_Financial_Serv.pdf"]

Latest Legal News