Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Supreme Court Grants Liberty to Petitioners to Represent for Revision of National Award for Teachers Selection Procedure

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement, the Supreme Court has granted liberty to the petitioners in Writ Petition (C) No. 908/2019 to make a detailed representation to the Union of India for the revision of the selection procedure under the National Award for Teachers (NAT) Scheme. The court disposed of the writ petition, allowing the petitioners the opportunity to present their concerns regarding the selection process.

The petitioners had sought a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to revise the selection procedure and accommodate every candidate, while also advocating for the elimination of the jury system at the national level. The revised guidelines introduced in 2018 were challenged, with the petitioners alleging that the new system was opaque and discriminatory.

The court, after considering the arguments put forth by the petitioners and the Union of India, acknowledged the government’s prerogative in formulating the selection procedure based on expert opinion and relevant criteria. However, it granted the petitioners the liberty to submit a detailed representation to the respondent if they intend to revise the selection procedure in the future.

“In the event, the respondent intends to revise the selection procedure in the future, the petitioners have been granted the liberty to make a detailed representation, which may be considered for implementation,” stated the court.

The judgement emphasized that if the representation contains aspects that could potentially improve the selection procedure, the respondent should duly consider and implement them.

The decision brings hope to the petitioners and others concerned about the transparency and inclusivity of the NAT Scheme’s selection process. It opens the door for further discussion and potential revisions to ensure fairness and equality in recognizing and honoring the contribution of teachers across the country.

The Supreme Court’s judgement reflects its commitment to justice and the importance of continually reassessing policies to address concerns raised by citizens.

Date of Decision: July 14, 2023

GIRISHA CHANDRA MISHRA & ORS.   vs UNION OF INDIA             

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Girisha_Chandra_Mishra_vs_Union_Of_India_on_14_July_2023_SC.pdf"]                  

Latest Legal News