Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Grants Bail in Civil-Related Criminal Case, Cites Dispute's Civil Nature

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of India has granted bail to Mohammed Ali Usmani in a criminal case that arose from a civil dispute. The judgment, delivered on September 27, 2023, by a bench comprising HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA, emphasized the prima facie civil nature of the dispute and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner.

Usmani had sought regular bail in FIR No. 51 of 2020, which alleged offenses under Sections 384, 420, 467, 468, 471, 201, 448, and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The dispute originated from a construction agreement involving Horizon Projects Indore Private Limited, where Usmani claimed that he was threatened by the complainant for taking possession of certain flats.

The court noted that the crux of the dispute lay in the civil realm and not within the ambit of criminal law. While the petitioner had been in custody since July 21, 2021, and the trial had commenced with eight witnesses already examined, the court did not express any views on the merits of the case. Instead, considering the extended period of custody and the anticipated duration of the trial, the petitioner was granted bail, subject to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

The decision was succinctly summarized in the judgment, stating, "Having regard to the period of custody undergone by the petitioner and the fact that the conclusion of trial will take some time, but without expressing any views on merits, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court."

The special leave petition was thus disposed of, and all pending applications were also addressed.

This judgment highlights the importance of distinguishing between civil and criminal disputes and ensuring that individuals are not unduly detained in cases where the dispute is primarily civil in nature.

Date of Decision: 27-09-2023

MOHAMMED ALI USMANI vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH       

Latest Legal News