Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Supreme Court Grants Bail in Civil-Related Criminal Case, Cites Dispute's Civil Nature

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of India has granted bail to Mohammed Ali Usmani in a criminal case that arose from a civil dispute. The judgment, delivered on September 27, 2023, by a bench comprising HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA, emphasized the prima facie civil nature of the dispute and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner.

Usmani had sought regular bail in FIR No. 51 of 2020, which alleged offenses under Sections 384, 420, 467, 468, 471, 201, 448, and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The dispute originated from a construction agreement involving Horizon Projects Indore Private Limited, where Usmani claimed that he was threatened by the complainant for taking possession of certain flats.

The court noted that the crux of the dispute lay in the civil realm and not within the ambit of criminal law. While the petitioner had been in custody since July 21, 2021, and the trial had commenced with eight witnesses already examined, the court did not express any views on the merits of the case. Instead, considering the extended period of custody and the anticipated duration of the trial, the petitioner was granted bail, subject to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

The decision was succinctly summarized in the judgment, stating, "Having regard to the period of custody undergone by the petitioner and the fact that the conclusion of trial will take some time, but without expressing any views on merits, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court."

The special leave petition was thus disposed of, and all pending applications were also addressed.

This judgment highlights the importance of distinguishing between civil and criminal disputes and ensuring that individuals are not unduly detained in cases where the dispute is primarily civil in nature.

Date of Decision: 27-09-2023

MOHAMMED ALI USMANI vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH       

Latest Legal News