Purposive Interpretation Necessary: High Court at Calcutta Clarifies Arbitration Scope “If the Testimony is True, We Act on It”: Kerala High Court Upholds Convictions in Divakaran Murder Case State Cannot Utilize Private Land Without Legal Acquisition and Compensation: High Court Upholds Lower Courts’ Rulings Delhi High Court Stresses ‘Procedure is the Handmaid of Justice’ in Allowing New Evidence in IFFCO TOKIO Case Mere Suspicion Cannot Substitute Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt – Allahabad High Court Acquits Rajveer Singh in Murder Case Non-Compliance with Labor Laws Cannot Deny Compensation for Informal Workers: Bombay High Court in Motor Accident Case Limitation Period Starts from Fraud Discovery, Not Sale Execution,” Rules Andhra Pradesh High Court Testamentary Court’s Role is Limited to Verifying Testamentary Disposition: Calcutta High Court Declares Appellant Cannot Say at One Time That a Process Is Valid to Gain an Advantage and Then Turn Around and Say It Is Invalid When the Result Is Unfavorable,” Rules High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh A humane approach is warranted in cases involving senior citizens: High Court Grants Relief in Bank Loan Recovery Case, Allows Installment Repayments Compliance with Section 52A of NDPS Act is Mandatory”: High Court Acquits Accused in Ganja Case Unregistered Lease Deed Admissible Under Section 90 Evidence Act: Orissa High Court Restores Permanent Injunction Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Used as "Backdoor Appeal" to Introduce New Evidence in Land Acquisition Cases: Supreme Court Payment Under Minimum Wages Act Does Not Establish Employment Relationship: High Court on Res Judicata in Labour Court Proceedings Taxation Law | Reopening Assessment Beyond Four Years Requires Proof of Failure to Disclose: Delhi High Court Rigors of Section 37 Cannot Override Medical Priority: Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Bail on Medical Grounds in NDPS Case Consumer Law | Mere Deterioration of Condition Post-Surgery Does Not Imply Medical Negligence Without Proof of Lack of Skill or Care: Supreme Court Supreme Court Declares Accessibility Rules for Disabled Must Be Mandatory, Strikes Down Voluntary Standards as "Ultra Vires" Court's Role Under Section 11(6A) is Limited to Verifying Existence of Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court Refers Dispute to Arbitration Section 37 of the Partnership Act Entitles Outgoing Partner to Profits Derived from Firm Assets Post-Dissolution Until Final Settlement: Supreme Court Media Cannot Act as a Parallel Court: Kerala High Court Examines Media’s Right to Report Pending Criminal Cases and Court Proceedings

Supreme Court Grants Bail in Civil-Related Criminal Case, Cites Dispute's Civil Nature

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of India has granted bail to Mohammed Ali Usmani in a criminal case that arose from a civil dispute. The judgment, delivered on September 27, 2023, by a bench comprising HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA, emphasized the prima facie civil nature of the dispute and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner.

Usmani had sought regular bail in FIR No. 51 of 2020, which alleged offenses under Sections 384, 420, 467, 468, 471, 201, 448, and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The dispute originated from a construction agreement involving Horizon Projects Indore Private Limited, where Usmani claimed that he was threatened by the complainant for taking possession of certain flats.

The court noted that the crux of the dispute lay in the civil realm and not within the ambit of criminal law. While the petitioner had been in custody since July 21, 2021, and the trial had commenced with eight witnesses already examined, the court did not express any views on the merits of the case. Instead, considering the extended period of custody and the anticipated duration of the trial, the petitioner was granted bail, subject to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

The decision was succinctly summarized in the judgment, stating, "Having regard to the period of custody undergone by the petitioner and the fact that the conclusion of trial will take some time, but without expressing any views on merits, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court."

The special leave petition was thus disposed of, and all pending applications were also addressed.

This judgment highlights the importance of distinguishing between civil and criminal disputes and ensuring that individuals are not unduly detained in cases where the dispute is primarily civil in nature.

Date of Decision: 27-09-2023

MOHAMMED ALI USMANI vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH       

Similar News