Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes State Election Commission's Cancellation of Panchayat Elections in Punjab J&K High Court Quashes FIR Against Bajaj Allianz, Asserts Insurance Dispute Shouldn’t Be Criminalized Sole Eyewitness's Testimony Insufficient to Sustain Murder Conviction: Madras High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Presumption of Innocence is Strengthened in Acquittal Cases; Appellate Courts Must Respect Trial Court Findings Unless Clearly Perverse: Delhi High Court NDPS | Physical or Virtual Presence of Accused is Mandatory for Extension of Detention Beyond 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Welfare Benefits for Construction Workers Due to Model Code of Conduct Section 131 of Electricity Act Does Not Mandate Finalized Transfer Scheme Before Bidding: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Privatization of UT Chandigarh Electricity Department Revenue Authorities Must Safeguard State Property, Not Indulge in Land Scams: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposed Amendment Clarifies, Not Changes, Cause of Action: High Court of Jharkhand emphasizing the necessity of amendment for determining real questions in controversy. EWS Candidates Selected on Merit Should Not Be Counted Towards Reserved Quota: P&H High Court Finance Act 2022 Amendments Upheld: Supreme Court Validates Retrospective Customs Authority for DRI Mere Breach Of Contract Does Not Constitute A Criminal Offense Unless Fraudulent Intent Exists From The Start: Delhi High Court Anticipatory Bail Not Intended As A Shield To Avoid Lawful Proceedings In Cases Of Serious Crimes: Allahabad High Court Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail in Light of Prolonged Detention and Delays in Trial U/S 480 BNSS Provision Bombay High Court Orders Disclosure of Candidates' Marks in Public Recruitment Process: Promotes Transparency under RTI Act Maintenance | Father's Duty to Support Daughters Until Self-Sufficiency or Marriage: Karnataka High Court Designation of Arbitration 'Venue' as 'Seat' Confers Exclusive Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Rules in Dubai Arbitration Case Corporate Veil Shields Company Assets from Partition as Joint Family Property: Madras High Court Principal Employers Liable for ESI Contributions for Contract Workers, But Assessments Must Be Fair and Account for Eligibility: Kerala High Court Government Entities Must be Treated Equally to Private Parties in Arbitration Proceedings: Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Disciplinary Inquiry Against Storekeeper in Ration Misappropriation Case

A humane approach is warranted in cases involving senior citizens: High Court Grants Relief in Bank Loan Recovery Case, Allows Installment Repayments

11 November 2024 3:54 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


The High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam has granted significant relief to a 71-year-old petitioner by allowing her to repay an outstanding loan in monthly installments. The judgment, delivered by Justice Dr. Kauser Edappagath on May 14, 2024, underlines the court’s consideration of the petitioner’s age and financial circumstances while dealing with the recovery proceedings initiated by Kerala Gramin Bank under the SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The petitioner, Sainaba A P K, a senior citizen, had availed a credit facility from Kerala Gramin Bank, Cheemeni Branch. Due to her failure to repay the loan, the account was declared a Non-Performing Asset (NPA), leading the bank to initiate recovery proceedings. Challenging these proceedings, Sainaba approached the High Court seeking relief.

The counsel for the bank confirmed that an amount of Rs. 11,40,929 was outstanding as of the hearing date. The bank expressed willingness to allow the petitioner to repay the amount in reasonable monthly installments.

The court considered the petitioner’s age and financial condition, directing her to repay the entire amount along with interest in 12 equal monthly installments starting from June 1, 2024. Justice Edappagath emphasized a compassionate approach, stating, "A humane approach is warranted in cases involving senior citizens."

The court stipulated that the petitioner must pay subsequent installments by the 5th of every month. If the petitioner defaults on any installment, the facility of installment payments would be canceled, and the bank would be free to proceed with recovery.

The judgment underscores the balance between financial institutions' rights to recover dues and the need for judicial compassion in special cases. By allowing installment payments, the court acknowledged the petitioner’s inability to repay the lump sum while ensuring the bank’s interests were protected. This approach is consistent with judicial precedents emphasizing the need for flexible solutions in recovery cases involving vulnerable individuals.

Justice Kauser Edappagath remarked, "The petitioner, being a senior citizen, deserves a considerate approach in dealing with the recovery proceedings. Allowing her to repay in installments ensures justice is served while safeguarding the bank’s interests."

The High Court’s decision provides a significant precedent for similar cases, highlighting the judiciary's role in offering equitable solutions in financial recovery matters. This judgment is expected to influence future cases, encouraging a balanced approach that considers the debtor's circumstances without compromising the creditor's rights.

Date of Decision: May 14, 2024
 

Similar News