MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Facilitates Amicable Resolution in Matrimonial Dispute: Upholds Dignity of Mutual Consent

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling , the Supreme Court of India, led by Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, showcased the judiciary’s proactive role in facilitating an amicable resolution in matrimonial disputes. The court successfully oversaw a mutual consent divorce settlement, upholding the dignity and mutual respect of the parties involved.

The case, involving the transfer petition (C) No. 594/2022 and I.A. No. 234137 of 2023, was filed under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Petitioner Vrushali sought the transfer of a matrimonial case from Karnataka to Maharashtra, eventually leading to a mutual consent divorce settlement.

The court observed, “In the circumstances, the matter between the parties may be concluded by accepting the Settlement Agreement and granting the decree by divorce by mutual consent.” This statement highlights the court’s approach towards respecting the parties’ decision to amicably resolve their differences.

The settlement agreement detailed the dissolution of the marriage, financial settlements, and custody arrangements. Notably, it included a financial settlement of Rs. 7,50,000 from the petitioner to the respondent and specified property rights.

This ruling is a testament to the Supreme Court’s commitment to upholding the principles of justice, dignity, and mutual respect in sensitive cases like matrimonial disputes. By facilitating a settlement, the court has shown a preference for amicable resolutions over prolonged litigation.

Date of Decision: 10 November 2023

VRUSHALI VS DINESH .

 

Latest Legal News