Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Supreme Court Extends Interim Protection on Bank Guarantees, Directs Expedited High Court Hearing

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant move, the Supreme Court of India has extended interim protection against the encashment of bank guarantees pertaining to the case involving Continental Engineering Corporation and Jaipur Metro Rail Corporation. The apex court’s order comes as a relief to the petitioner, who approached the Supreme Court after the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan delayed its decision on the matter.

In the proceedings held on November 20, 2023, the Supreme Court observed, “Since the statement which was made by the first respondent was to remain in operation only until 17 November 2023 and was not extended thereafter, the petitioner has moved this Court.” This observation was critical in understanding the urgency of the petitioner’s situation, where the imminent expiry of bank guarantees posed a significant financial risk.

The dispute revolves around performance and retention bank guarantees furnished by the petitioner to the first respondent. The invocation of these guarantees was contested in the High Court under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. However, a jurisdictional challenge based on the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, led to a postponement of the hearing, prompting the petitioner to seek relief from the Supreme Court.

In its order, the Supreme Court stated, “Both the parties have agreed to the above course of action and state that they will cooperate in the hearing of the application for the grant of injunctive relief.” This directive underlines the Court’s commitment to ensuring a fair and expedited hearing in the High Court.

Date of Decision: 20-11-2023

M/S. CONTINENTAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION VS JAIPUR METRO RAIL CORPORATION & ORS.     

Latest Legal News