Lack Of Boundaries In Sale Deed Not Fatal To Title If Plot Number & Parent Title Are Sufficiently Identifiable: Calcutta High Court Terror Perception Of Underworld Justifies Delay In Invoking MCOCA; Purely Civil Disputes Can Metamorphose Into Criminal Offence: Bombay High Court Identical Wills Executed By Spouses On Same Day Not Necessarily 'Mutual Wills' Restricting Power Of Alienation: Delhi High Court Written Notice Not Mandatory For Revoking Permission Under Section 41 Presidency Small Cause Courts Act: Gujarat High Court Wife Cannot Maintain Complaint Against Husband Under Senior Citizens Act; Not Intended For Spousal Disputes: Karnataka High Court Mere Presence At Scene Or Facilitation Without Intent To Aid Crime Does Not Amount To Abetment: Delhi High Court Offences Under IT Act Punishable With 3 Years Imprisonment Are Bailable Under Section 77B: Kerala High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail In KCA Data Theft Case Premature Release Can't Be Denied Citing Section 435 CrPC If Sentence Under Central Act Is Already Served: Madras High Court Suppression Of Higher Qualification To Secure Job Reserved For Lower Education Is Foundational Fraud, Sympathy Has No Role: Supreme Court MBBS Admissions | Candidate Using NIOS Marks To Meet 50% Eligibility Cannot Claim State Govt School Quota: Orissa High Court High Court Cannot Exercise Article 227 Power To Strike Off Plaint When Remedy Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Exists: Madras High Court Section 69 IEA | Onus On Propounder To Lead Secondary Evidence & Remove Suspicious Circumstances If Attesting Witnesses Are Dead: Telangana High Court

Supreme Court Extends Interim Protection on Bank Guarantees, Directs Expedited High Court Hearing

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant move, the Supreme Court of India has extended interim protection against the encashment of bank guarantees pertaining to the case involving Continental Engineering Corporation and Jaipur Metro Rail Corporation. The apex court’s order comes as a relief to the petitioner, who approached the Supreme Court after the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan delayed its decision on the matter.

In the proceedings held on November 20, 2023, the Supreme Court observed, “Since the statement which was made by the first respondent was to remain in operation only until 17 November 2023 and was not extended thereafter, the petitioner has moved this Court.” This observation was critical in understanding the urgency of the petitioner’s situation, where the imminent expiry of bank guarantees posed a significant financial risk.

The dispute revolves around performance and retention bank guarantees furnished by the petitioner to the first respondent. The invocation of these guarantees was contested in the High Court under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. However, a jurisdictional challenge based on the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, led to a postponement of the hearing, prompting the petitioner to seek relief from the Supreme Court.

In its order, the Supreme Court stated, “Both the parties have agreed to the above course of action and state that they will cooperate in the hearing of the application for the grant of injunctive relief.” This directive underlines the Court’s commitment to ensuring a fair and expedited hearing in the High Court.

Date of Decision: 20-11-2023

M/S. CONTINENTAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION VS JAIPUR METRO RAIL CORPORATION & ORS.     

Latest Legal News