Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Supreme Court Extends Interim Protection on Bank Guarantees, Directs Expedited High Court Hearing

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant move, the Supreme Court of India has extended interim protection against the encashment of bank guarantees pertaining to the case involving Continental Engineering Corporation and Jaipur Metro Rail Corporation. The apex court’s order comes as a relief to the petitioner, who approached the Supreme Court after the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan delayed its decision on the matter.

In the proceedings held on November 20, 2023, the Supreme Court observed, “Since the statement which was made by the first respondent was to remain in operation only until 17 November 2023 and was not extended thereafter, the petitioner has moved this Court.” This observation was critical in understanding the urgency of the petitioner’s situation, where the imminent expiry of bank guarantees posed a significant financial risk.

The dispute revolves around performance and retention bank guarantees furnished by the petitioner to the first respondent. The invocation of these guarantees was contested in the High Court under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. However, a jurisdictional challenge based on the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, led to a postponement of the hearing, prompting the petitioner to seek relief from the Supreme Court.

In its order, the Supreme Court stated, “Both the parties have agreed to the above course of action and state that they will cooperate in the hearing of the application for the grant of injunctive relief.” This directive underlines the Court’s commitment to ensuring a fair and expedited hearing in the High Court.

Date of Decision: 20-11-2023

M/S. CONTINENTAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION VS JAIPUR METRO RAIL CORPORATION & ORS.     

Latest Legal News