Stamp Act | Agreements to Sell with Possession Clauses Are Conveyances and Must Be Stamped Separately: Supreme Court    |     Supreme Court Directs Immediate Implementation of Electronic Road Safety Monitoring Under Motor Vehicles Act    |     False Claims Shake Court's Trust in Legal Proceedings: Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Premature Release After False Statements on Imprisonment Duration    |     Executive Instructions Cannot Supplant Statutory Notifications: Bombay High Court Holds on Environmental Clearances    |     Illegal Mining Is Not a Scheduled Offence Under PMLA: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Arrest of MLA Surender Panwar    |     Customers Liable Under Section 370(A) IPC if They Knew Victims Were Trafficked: Telangana High Court    |     Literal Interpretation of Taxing Statute Cannot Frustrate The Legislative Intent To Promote Infrastructure Development: Calcutta High Court    |     Medical Evidence Reveals One Child Died 13 Hours After Accused’s Rescue: Kerala High Court Acquits Mother Convicted of Killing Her Children    |     Non-compliance with interim maintenance order cannot bar divorce proceedings: Orissa High Court    |     DNA Evidence Cannot Be the Sole Basis for Conviction Without Proper Chain of Custody: Bombay High Court Quashes Conviction in POCSO and Rape Case    |     Force Majeure Cannot Be Invoked Without Timely Notice: Madras High Court    |     Non-payment of Compensation for Over Four Decades Shocks Judicial Conscience: Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Compensation Recalculation for 42-Year    |     Madhya Pradesh High Court Upholds Retirement Age of 60 for Cement Workers, Grants Full Back Wages to Wrongfully Retired Workmen    |     Supreme Court Grants Bail to Tamil Nadu Ex-Minister V. Senthil Balaji in Corruption and Money Laundering Case    |     Courts Can Award Maintenance More Than Claimed Based on Income: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds ₹25,000 Maintenance    |     Mere Possession of Child Pornography with Intent Can Trigger POCSO Offences, Even Without Transmission: Supreme Court    |     Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Taxation Law | Issuing Notices to a Dead Person is a Fundamental Jurisdictional Error: Delhi HC Sets Aside Reassessment Proceedings    |     Common Intention Can Be Inferred from the Conduct of the Accused Moments Before the Act: Supreme Court    |     Supreme Court Grants Divorce by Mutual Consent, Quashes All Pending Cases in Matrimonial Dispute    |    

Supreme Court Extends Interim Protection on Bank Guarantees, Directs Expedited High Court Hearing

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant move, the Supreme Court of India has extended interim protection against the encashment of bank guarantees pertaining to the case involving Continental Engineering Corporation and Jaipur Metro Rail Corporation. The apex court’s order comes as a relief to the petitioner, who approached the Supreme Court after the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan delayed its decision on the matter.

In the proceedings held on November 20, 2023, the Supreme Court observed, “Since the statement which was made by the first respondent was to remain in operation only until 17 November 2023 and was not extended thereafter, the petitioner has moved this Court.” This observation was critical in understanding the urgency of the petitioner’s situation, where the imminent expiry of bank guarantees posed a significant financial risk.

The dispute revolves around performance and retention bank guarantees furnished by the petitioner to the first respondent. The invocation of these guarantees was contested in the High Court under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. However, a jurisdictional challenge based on the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, led to a postponement of the hearing, prompting the petitioner to seek relief from the Supreme Court.

In its order, the Supreme Court stated, “Both the parties have agreed to the above course of action and state that they will cooperate in the hearing of the application for the grant of injunctive relief.” This directive underlines the Court’s commitment to ensuring a fair and expedited hearing in the High Court.

Date of Decision: 20-11-2023

M/S. CONTINENTAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION VS JAIPUR METRO RAIL CORPORATION & ORS.     

Similar News