Mere Entry, Abuse Or Assault Is Not Civil Contempt – Willfulness And Dispossession Must Be Clearly Proved: Bombay High Court Magistrate Cannot Shut Eyes To Final Report After Cognizance – Supplementary Report Must Be Judicially Considered Before Framing Charges: Allahabad High Court Examination-in-Chief Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction Amid Serious Doubts: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal in Grievous Hurt Case Employees Cannot Pick Favourable Terms and Reject the Rest: Bombay High Court Upholds SIDBI’s Cut-Off Date for Pension to CPF Optees Cannot Reclaim Absolute Ownership After Letting Your Declaration Suit Fail: AP High Court Enforces Finality in Partition Appeal Death Due to Fat Embolism and Delayed Treatment Is Not Culpable Homicide: Orissa High Court Converts 30-Year-Old 304 Part-I Conviction to Grievous Hurt Fabricated Lease Cannot Be Sanctified by Consolidation Entry: Orissa High Court Dismisses 36-Year-Old Second Appeal Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Mere Long Possession By One Co-Owner Does Not Destroy The Co-Ownership Right Of The Other: Madras High Court State Cannot Hide Behind An Illegal Undertaking: Punjab & Haryana High Court Questions Denial Of Retrospective Regularization

Supreme Court Emphasizes 'Limited Scope of Judicial Review' in Departmental Inquiries, Sets Aside High Court Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment dated August 24, 2023, the Supreme Court emphasized the "limited scope of judicial review" in departmental inquiries and set aside the orders of both the learned Single Judge and the Division Bench. The case involved a departmental inquiry against a bank official for alleged misconduct, including the non-submission of control forms and transgression of the area of operation.

The Court stated, "The Court's role is not to act as an appellate body or to re-appreciate evidence but to ensure that the findings of the inquiry are based on some evidence." This observation was made in the context of the limited scope of judicial review against departmental inquiry proceedings. [Para 36, Page 31]

The learned Single Judge had earlier found justification in specific aspects of the departmental inquiry. The Supreme Court expressed satisfaction with the Enquiry Report, stating, "The Court expressed satisfaction with the Enquiry Report, which fortified the conclusions of the learned Single Judge." [Para 15-17, Page 11]

On the topic of severability of charges and penalties in disciplinary proceedings, the Court clarified, "If the penalty can be imposed based on the charges that are proved and if such a penalty is lawfully sustainable, then it is not for the Court to consider whether those grounds alone would have weighed with the disciplinary authority in imposing the punishment." [Para 38-39, Page 32]

Supreme Court concluded by setting aside the orders of the learned Single Judge and the Division Bench, thereby dismissing Writ Petition No. 29547 of 1997 filed by the respondent. The Court allowed the appeal and clarified that there would be no order as to costs. [Para 41, Page 35]

Date of Decision August 24, 2023

State Bank of India vs A.G.D. Reddy

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/24-Aug-2023_SBI_VS_AG_Reddy.pdf"]

Latest Legal News