Inadequate Explanation Under Section 313 CrPC Cannot Be Foundation For Conviction If Prosecution Fails To Prove Case: Allahabad High Court No-Confidence Motion In Housing Societies Fails If 2/3 Majority Not Met; Fractions In Voting Threshold Cannot Be Rounded Down: Bombay High Court Successor Rent Controller Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence Or Act As Appellate Court Under Review Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Restores Eviction Order Article 21 Overrides PMLA Section 45 Rigors In Cases Of Unduly Long Incarceration Without Trial: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail To SSC Scam ‘Middleman’ Unregistered Family Partition Deed Recording Past Oral Arrangement Doesn't Require Compulsory Registration: Gujarat High Court Private Banks Acting As Authorised Dealers Under FEMA Amenable To Writ Jurisdiction; Can Refuse Transactions For 'Sanctions-Related' Concerns: Gauhati High Court Non-Examination Of Investigating Officer Not Fatal To Prosecution Case If Eyewitness Testimony Is Credible & Trustworthy: Jharkhand High Court Mere Denial Of Signature Insufficient When Execution Is Proved Through Endorsements: Karnataka High Court Restores Specific Performance Decree Sectarianism Claims Can't Discredit Reliable Testimony Of Child Sexual Abuse Victim: Kerala High Court Upholds Madrassa Teacher's Conviction State Must Prove Specific 'Public Interest' To Exempt Projects From Social Impact Assessment Under Section 10A Land Acquisition Act: Telangana High Court Or 2 Rule 2 CPC |Failure To Seek Specific Performance In Earlier Injunction Suit Bars Subsequent Claim; Readiness & Willingness Must Be Continuous: Madras High Court Exoneration In Departmental Proceedings Does Not Result In Automatic Discharge In Criminal Case: Orissa High Court History Sheet Can Be Opened On 'Reasonable Belief' Even Without Conviction, But Must Be Reviewed After 7 Years Of Good Conduct: Rajasthan High Court

Supreme Court Emphasizes 'Limited Scope of Judicial Review' in Departmental Inquiries, Sets Aside High Court Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment dated August 24, 2023, the Supreme Court emphasized the "limited scope of judicial review" in departmental inquiries and set aside the orders of both the learned Single Judge and the Division Bench. The case involved a departmental inquiry against a bank official for alleged misconduct, including the non-submission of control forms and transgression of the area of operation.

The Court stated, "The Court's role is not to act as an appellate body or to re-appreciate evidence but to ensure that the findings of the inquiry are based on some evidence." This observation was made in the context of the limited scope of judicial review against departmental inquiry proceedings. [Para 36, Page 31]

The learned Single Judge had earlier found justification in specific aspects of the departmental inquiry. The Supreme Court expressed satisfaction with the Enquiry Report, stating, "The Court expressed satisfaction with the Enquiry Report, which fortified the conclusions of the learned Single Judge." [Para 15-17, Page 11]

On the topic of severability of charges and penalties in disciplinary proceedings, the Court clarified, "If the penalty can be imposed based on the charges that are proved and if such a penalty is lawfully sustainable, then it is not for the Court to consider whether those grounds alone would have weighed with the disciplinary authority in imposing the punishment." [Para 38-39, Page 32]

Supreme Court concluded by setting aside the orders of the learned Single Judge and the Division Bench, thereby dismissing Writ Petition No. 29547 of 1997 filed by the respondent. The Court allowed the appeal and clarified that there would be no order as to costs. [Para 41, Page 35]

Date of Decision August 24, 2023

State Bank of India vs A.G.D. Reddy

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/24-Aug-2023_SBI_VS_AG_Reddy.pdf"]

Latest Legal News