IT Act | Unpaid Excise Duty On Stock In Bonded Warehouse Can't Be Disallowed If Not Debited To P&L Account: Supreme Court Supreme Court Cannot Act As Supervisory Body Over Arbitral Execution Under Guise Of Clarification War Injury Pension Admissible For Disabilities In Specially Notified Operations Like 'Operation Rakshak' Absent Express Policy Exclusion: Supreme Court Income Tax Act | Reassessment Valid If Fresh Tangible Material Shows Escapement; Plea Of 'Change Of Opinion' Untenable Without Prior Conscious Adjudication: Supreme Court Arbitration Act | Power To Extend Arbitral Mandate Vests In S.2(1)(e) 'Court', Not High Court Under S.11; S.14 IBC No Bar On Claims By Corporate Debtor: Supreme Court Section 292BB IT Act Inapplicable Where Notice Not Issued At All; Notice Under Section 143(2) Mandatory Jurisdictional Prerequisite For Reassessment Under Section 147: Supreme Court PC Act | 'Known Sources Of Income' Means Sources Disclosed To Prosecution; IO Need Not Conduct Roving Enquiry Into Undisclosed Assets: Supreme Court Non-Furnishing Of Written Grounds Of Arrest Under Section 47 BNSS Not Blanket Ground For Bail Absent Demonstrable Prejudice: Supreme Court Cross-Suits Under Trade Marks Act: Supreme Court Exercises Section 25 CPC Discretion To Consolidate & Transfer Parallel Infringement Suits To Neutral Forum Striking Off Husband's Defence For Default In Interim Maintenance Does Not Extinguish Right To Cross-Examine Wife: Madhya Pradesh High Court Under Section 125 CrPC Proclaimed Offender Ineligible For Anticipatory Bail Unless No Prima Facie Offence Disclosed, Advocate Status Offers No Shield: Delhi High Court Under Section 84 BNSS Order 38 Rule 5 CPC | Defendant Residing Outside Jurisdiction Or Evasive Written Statement No Ground To Direct Furnishing Of Security Absent Intent To Obstruct Decree: Delhi High Court Cheque Issued By Guarantor Falls Under Section 138 NI Act; Principal Debtor’s Incarceration Does Not Extinguish Criminal Liability: Rajasthan High Court S. 151 CPC Cannot Be Invoked To Circumvent Summary Scheme Under S. 25-B DRC Act By Belatedly Supplementing Leave To Defend: Delhi High Court Fresh Encroachers Lacking Title Cannot Stall Execution Of Concluded Eviction Orders Affirmed By Supreme Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Production Of Birth Register Without Proving Source Of Information Cannot Prove Minority Under POCSO Act: Gujarat High Court Mere Agreement To Sell Or Suit For Specific Performance Confers No Title Under Section 54 TP Act, Cannot Bar Eviction Decree Against Permissive Occupant: Gujarat High Court Regional Rural Banks Cannot Perpetuate Exploitative Temporary Engagements For Perennial Roles; Must Frame Regularisation Scheme Under Article 226: Orissa High Court Odisha Grama Panchayats Act | 15 Clear Days Notice Mandatory For No Confidence Motion; Computed From Date Of Dispatch Excluding Dispatch & Meeting Dates: Orissa High Court Order 21 Rule 97 CPC | Technical Objection That CMA Lies Instead Of Revision Cannot Defeat Merits Adjudication When Auction Purchaser Deprived Of Possession For Decades: Andhra Pradesh High Court Time-Barred Challenge To Sale Deeds & Property Substitution Affecting Third-Party Rights Impermissible Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC: Bombay High Court No Woman Can Be Compelled To Continue Pregnancy, Court Order Sufficient If Guardian Reluctant To Bear Medical Risk: Kerala High Court Permits Termination At 27 Weeks For Minor Rape Survivor Section 25(3) Contract Act Inapplicable Without Proving Due Execution; Firm Cheque Signed Solely By Retired Partner Cannot Revive Time-Barred Debt: Kerala High Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Affirms Labour Court’s Altered Punishment

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, September 14, 2023: The Supreme Court of India today dismissed an appeal filed by the Chief Manager of the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (RSRTC) against a respondent who had passed away. The case had been ongoing for several years, involving an RSRTC employee who had initially been dismissed from service for operating a bus unauthorizedly.

Application for Substitution Allowed

The court began by allowing an application for substitution due to the passing away of both the original employee and his spouse, who had taken up the case after his demise. The delay in filing the application for substitution was also condoned by the court.

 Labour Court’s Decision Upheld

The Labour Court had earlier altered the punishment of the employee from dismissal from service to withholding one year’s salary with a non-cumulative effect. This decision was upheld by the High Court and has now been affirmed by the Supreme Court as well. The appellant had argued that the Labour Court’s decision should not stand as a writ petition filed earlier had been dismissed. However, the Court pointed out that the dismissal of the writ petition did not prevent the filing of an industrial dispute.

 No Ground for Interference

The apex court ruled that it found no ground for interfering with the impugned judgment and dismissed the appeal, directing parties to bear their own costs.

The order was passed by a bench comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Sudhanshu Dhulia. Dr. Ritu Bhardwaj represented the appellant, and Mr. Merusagar Samantaray represented the respondent.

This decision marks a significant ruling in the realm of industrial disputes, particularly regarding the scope and limitations in successive rounds of litigation.

Date of Decision: September 14, 2023

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION vs CHETAN DEVI (DEAD)               

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/The_Chief_Manager_Rajasthan_vs_Chetan_Devi_14_September_20231.pdf"]         

Latest Legal News