High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Divorce Cannot Be Granted Merely on WhatsApp Chats: Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Based on Unproved Electronic Evidence State Cannot Demand Settlement Amount Yet Withhold Legitimate Refund: Bombay High Court Strikes Down MVAT Settlement Order Surveyor’s Report Is Not Sacrosanct; Arbitral Award Ignoring Vital Evidence Is Perverse: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Insurance Arbitration Award When Victim Lives Under Exclusive Control Of Accused, Burden Shifts To Accused To Explain What Happened: Calcutta High Court Medical Evidence Clearly Indicating Suicide Cannot Be Overlooked, Prosecution Must Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Andhra Pradesh High Court 'Candidates Acted With Full Knowledge of Consequences': Kerala High Court Reverses Order for Refund of 10% Exit Fee in Medical PG Mop-Up Admissions Dispensing with Departmental Inquiry Without Material is Arbitrary: Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Delhi Police Constable Power Of Attorney Holder Authorized To Enforce Pre-Emption Right Can File Suit, Death Of Principal Does Not Bar Legal Heirs: Orissa High Court Government Servant Convicted In Criminal Case Can Be Dismissed Without Departmental Enquiry: Tripura High Court Upholds Teacher’s Dismissal RTI Cannot Be Used To Bypass Statutory Bar On Police Case Diaries: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Penalty Against Police Officers Externment Cannot Be Based On Police Report And Stale Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes District Magistrate’s Order Even Exonerated Accused Can Be Summoned During Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Summoning Under Section 358 BNSS Benefit of Doubt Acquittal Not Equal to Honourable Acquittal: Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Police Constable Candidate Madras High Court Allows NEET-Failed Student To Appear In CBSE Class XII Mathematics Exam After Last-Minute Subject Switch By Parents Salary of Parents Cannot Be Used to Deny OBC Non-Creamy Layer Status in Absence of Post Equivalence: Supreme Court Father Who Rapes Minor Daughter Cannot Seek Leniency: Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment Construction Of Toilet Is Bare Necessity For Proper Use Of Premises, Expression "Own Use" Not Confined To Landlord's Personal Physical Use: Calcutta High Court 353 IPC | Conviction Cannot Rest On Uncorroborated Testimony Of Sole Witness When Other Evidence Contradicts Occurrence: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal 250 BNSS | 60-Day Discharge Period Is Procedural, Does Not Extinguish Accused's Right To Seek Discharge: Gujarat High Court Section 45 PMLA Cannot Become an Instrument of Endless Incarceration: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in ₹18 Crore Scholarship Scam Case Land Acquisition — Heirs Who Slept on Rights for 23 Years Cannot Claim Ignorance to Revive Dead Challenge: Karnataka High Court Institutional Hearing Is No Violation of Natural Justice: Kerala High Court Upholds BPCL’s Termination of Decades-Old Petroleum Dealership Witnesses Not Expected To Recount Past Incidents With Mathematical Precision, Minor Contradictions Don't Demolish Credibility: Orissa High Court If a Suit Is Ex Facie Barred by Limitation, the Court Has No Choice but to Dismiss It: P&H High Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Affirms Labour Court’s Altered Punishment

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, September 14, 2023: The Supreme Court of India today dismissed an appeal filed by the Chief Manager of the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (RSRTC) against a respondent who had passed away. The case had been ongoing for several years, involving an RSRTC employee who had initially been dismissed from service for operating a bus unauthorizedly.

Application for Substitution Allowed

The court began by allowing an application for substitution due to the passing away of both the original employee and his spouse, who had taken up the case after his demise. The delay in filing the application for substitution was also condoned by the court.

 Labour Court’s Decision Upheld

The Labour Court had earlier altered the punishment of the employee from dismissal from service to withholding one year’s salary with a non-cumulative effect. This decision was upheld by the High Court and has now been affirmed by the Supreme Court as well. The appellant had argued that the Labour Court’s decision should not stand as a writ petition filed earlier had been dismissed. However, the Court pointed out that the dismissal of the writ petition did not prevent the filing of an industrial dispute.

 No Ground for Interference

The apex court ruled that it found no ground for interfering with the impugned judgment and dismissed the appeal, directing parties to bear their own costs.

The order was passed by a bench comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Sudhanshu Dhulia. Dr. Ritu Bhardwaj represented the appellant, and Mr. Merusagar Samantaray represented the respondent.

This decision marks a significant ruling in the realm of industrial disputes, particularly regarding the scope and limitations in successive rounds of litigation.

Date of Decision: September 14, 2023

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION vs CHETAN DEVI (DEAD)               

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/The_Chief_Manager_Rajasthan_vs_Chetan_Devi_14_September_20231.pdf"]         

Latest Legal News