At the Stage of Framing Charge, Presumption Suffices; Suicide Note and Grave Suspicion Enough: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Charge Under Section 306 IPC 173 CrPC | Framing of Charge Marks End of Investigation—Complainant Cannot Reopen Probe Merely by Citing Police Lapses: Bombay High Court Recovery Alone Cannot Prove Guilt: Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Photos, Videos Must Go: Supreme Court Binds Warring Spouses to Clean Up Social Media in Matrimonial Settlement Standard for Bail Under Section 319 CrPC Is Higher Than Framing of Charge, But Short of Conviction: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused Summoned Mid-Trial State Cannot Arbitrarily Deny Subsidies to 'New Industrial Units' by Retrospectively Applying Expansion Caps: Supreme Court Companies Act | Offence Under Section 448 Is Covered Under Section 447: Supreme Court Bars Private Complaint Without SFIO Nod “See-To-It” Obligation Is Not A Guarantee Under Indian Law: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope Of Section 126 ICA In IBC Disputes Mere Employment of Litigant’s Relatives in Police or Court Doesn't Prove Judicial Bias: Supreme Court Sets Aside Transfer of Criminal Case Reserved Candidate Availing Relaxed Standards in Prelims Cannot Migrate to General Quota for Cadre Allocation: Supreme Court Mere Vesting Does Not Mean Possession: Supreme Court Rules ULC Proceedings Abated For Failure To Serve Mandatory Notice To Actual Occupants Contempt of Courts Act | Natural Justice in Administrative Action: Supreme Court Directs West Bengal Govt to Re-Adjudicate Teachers' Arrears Claims Live-In Relationship with Married Man Not a ‘Relationship in the Nature of Marriage’ Under Domestic Violence Act: Bombay High Court Applies Supreme Court Guidelines Income Tax Act | Substitution of Shares held as Stock-in-Trade upon Amalgamation constitutes Taxable Business Income if Commercially Realisable: Supreme Court Judges Cannot Enact Their Own Protocols During Bail Hearings: Supreme Court Sets Aside Sweeping Age Determination Directions In POCSO If There Is Knowledge That Injury Is Likely To Cause Death, But No Intention Falls Under Section 304 Part II:  Supreme Court High Court Ignored POCSO’s Statutory Rigour, Committed Grave Error in Granting Bail: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Gang-Rape Accused Section 22 HSA | Co-Heirs Have Statutory Right of Pre-Emption Even in Urban Property: Punjab & Haryana High Court 138 NI Act | Issuance of Separate Cheques Gives Rise to Independent Causes of Action, Even if Drawn for Same Underlying Transaction: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Closes Controversy, Directs Ford India to Pay Rs. 36.87 Lakhs in Defective Vehicle Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India put an end to a long-standing dispute between Ford India Private Limited and Medical Elaborate Concept Private Limited & Ors. The Court directed Ford India to pay Rs. 36.87 lakhs to the first respondent, minus the amount already deposited with the State Commission, in a case concerning a defective Ford Titanium Endeavour 3.4L vehicle.

The Court stated in Its order, “Taking into consideration the totality of the circumstances and it being an admitted fact that the vehicle had some manufacturing defects and despite replacement of the engine, the vehicle has been alleged to be not roadworthy, we deem it appropriate to close the controversy and dispose of this appeal.”

The controversy began when the first respondent purchased the vehicle from Ford India’s authorized dealer and subsequently faced various issues, including oil leakage. The State Commission accepted the complaint and ordered the replacement of the engine, as well as a daily compensation of Rs. 2,000/-. However, even after the engine replacement, the vehicle was still plagued with problems, rendering it unsuitable for driving.

During the proceedings, the Court explored the possibility of an amicable settlement but was unable to reach an agreement. Consequently, the Court issued directions, requiring Ford India to pay the balance amount of Rs. 36 lakhs within two weeks. Additionally, Ford India was directed to reimburse the first respondent Rs. 87,000/- towards the insurance of the vehicle.

The Court's judgment also specified that upon receipt of the aforementioned amounts, the first respondent would hand over the vehicle to Ford India, effectively transferring ownership. Furthermore, the attachment orders passed by the State Commission were set aside, and all pending proceedings between the parties were deemed terminated.

This judgment by the Supreme Court provides a significant resolution to the dispute, ensuring compensation for the defective vehicle and bringing closure to the protracted legal battle.

Date of Decision:5th July, 2023

FORD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED  vs M/S. MEDICAL ELEBORATE CONCEPT PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/05-jul-2023-Ford-India-Pvt-Ltd-v.-MS.-MEDICAL-ELEBORATE-CONCEPT-PRIVATE-LIMITED-^0-ORS^.pdf"]

Latest Legal News