Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Supreme Court Closes Controversy, Directs Ford India to Pay Rs. 36.87 Lakhs in Defective Vehicle Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India put an end to a long-standing dispute between Ford India Private Limited and Medical Elaborate Concept Private Limited & Ors. The Court directed Ford India to pay Rs. 36.87 lakhs to the first respondent, minus the amount already deposited with the State Commission, in a case concerning a defective Ford Titanium Endeavour 3.4L vehicle.

The Court stated in Its order, “Taking into consideration the totality of the circumstances and it being an admitted fact that the vehicle had some manufacturing defects and despite replacement of the engine, the vehicle has been alleged to be not roadworthy, we deem it appropriate to close the controversy and dispose of this appeal.”

The controversy began when the first respondent purchased the vehicle from Ford India’s authorized dealer and subsequently faced various issues, including oil leakage. The State Commission accepted the complaint and ordered the replacement of the engine, as well as a daily compensation of Rs. 2,000/-. However, even after the engine replacement, the vehicle was still plagued with problems, rendering it unsuitable for driving.

During the proceedings, the Court explored the possibility of an amicable settlement but was unable to reach an agreement. Consequently, the Court issued directions, requiring Ford India to pay the balance amount of Rs. 36 lakhs within two weeks. Additionally, Ford India was directed to reimburse the first respondent Rs. 87,000/- towards the insurance of the vehicle.

The Court's judgment also specified that upon receipt of the aforementioned amounts, the first respondent would hand over the vehicle to Ford India, effectively transferring ownership. Furthermore, the attachment orders passed by the State Commission were set aside, and all pending proceedings between the parties were deemed terminated.

This judgment by the Supreme Court provides a significant resolution to the dispute, ensuring compensation for the defective vehicle and bringing closure to the protracted legal battle.

Date of Decision:5th July, 2023

FORD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED  vs M/S. MEDICAL ELEBORATE CONCEPT PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/05-jul-2023-Ford-India-Pvt-Ltd-v.-MS.-MEDICAL-ELEBORATE-CONCEPT-PRIVATE-LIMITED-^0-ORS^.pdf"]

Latest Legal News