MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Clears Path for High Court to Reassess Cooperative Bank Dispute: ‘No Bar to Decide the Matter Afresh’”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India, led by Justices M.M. Sundresh and Aravind Kumar, has set a new precedent in the ongoing dispute involving the Osmanabad District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. And the Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank. The Apex Court, in its latest judgement, clarified that previous orders should not hinder the High Court from reassessing the case on its merits.

The controversy, which has seen various twists and turns over the years, revolves around financial transactions and frozen funds between cooperative society banks. The Supreme Court, in its decision dated November 20, 2023, has directed the High Court to reevaluate two primary issues: the release of funds to the Nagpur District Central Cooperative Bank and the accrued interest on the principal amount of Rs. 30 Crores.

Justice M.M. Sundresh, in his observation, stated, “The earlier orders passed by us will not stand in the way of the High Court to go into the merits of the case on the two issues flagged by us.” This statement has been seen as a significant move to untangle the legal complexities that have stalled the resolution of this dispute.

The Apex Court’s decision comes after noting the prolonged delay in the trial court proceedings of RCC No. 398/2002. Expressing concern over the mechanical adjournments and lack of progress, the Court has instructed the High Court of Judicature of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad to expedite the transfer of records to the trial court. The trial court has been further directed to conclude the trial within six months following the receipt of these records.

Date of Decision: 20th November 2023

THE OSMANABAD DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. VS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

Latest Legal News