State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act Marriage Cannot Be Perpetuated on Paper When Cohabitation Has Ceased for Decades: Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 to Grant Divorce Despite Wife’s Opposition Ownership of Trucks Does Not Mean Windfall Compensation: Supreme Court Slashes Inflated Motor Accident Award in Absence of Documentary Proof Concealment of Mortgage Is Fraud, Not a Technical Omission: Supreme Court Restores Refund Decree, Slams High Court’s Remand State Reorganization Does Not Automatically Convert Cooperative Societies into Multi-State Entities: Supreme Court Rejects Blanket Interpretation of Section 103 Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Once a Court Declares a Department an Industry Under Section 2(j), State Cannot Raise the Same Objection Again: Gujarat High Court Slams Repetitive Litigation by Irrigation Department “How Could Cheques Issued in 2020 Be Mentioned in a 2019 Contract?”: Delhi High Court Grants Injunction in Forged MOA Case, Slams Prima Facie Fabrication

Supreme Court Calls for Comprehensive Sexuality Education to Combat Child Marriage

20 October 2024 9:10 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


“Comprehensive sexuality education is key to empowering children and preventing child marriages.” - Supreme Court. In its judgment on October 18, 2024, in the case of Society for Enlightenment and Voluntary Action & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors., the Supreme Court of India underscored the need for integrating comprehensive sexuality education into school curricula as a crucial step in preventing child marriages. The Court directed all States and Union Territories (UTs) to implement education programs that inform children about their rights, reproductive health, and the social and legal consequences of child marriage.

"Education must empower children with the knowledge to resist harmful practices like child marriage."

The Supreme Court mandated that comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) must be introduced in schools across the country, in line with international guidelines such as those from the World Health Organization (WHO). This education should cover reproductive rights, gender equality, the legal aspects of marriage, and the physical and psychological consequences of early marriages. The Court stressed that age-appropriate, culturally sensitive content should be developed to ensure students fully understand their rights and the importance of delaying marriage until adulthood.

The Role of Education in Preventing Child Marriages:

The Court highlighted that many children, particularly girls, are unaware of their legal rights and the long-term consequences of early marriage. Comprehensive sexuality education will provide them with the tools to make informed decisions about their future, including understanding the risks of early marriage on health, education, and personal development. By integrating this education into the school system, the Court aims to empower young girls and boys to resist societal pressures and advocate for their rights.

Addressing Gender Inequality Through Education:

The Supreme Court emphasized that education is not merely a preventive tool but a transformative one. By teaching children about gender equality, personal autonomy, and reproductive health, comprehensive sexuality education challenges the traditional norms that perpetuate gender-based discrimination and the subjugation of women through child marriage.

"Education is a vital tool to break the cycle of child marriage and empower young girls to reclaim their future."

The Supreme Court's directive to incorporate comprehensive sexuality education into school curricula marks a significant step in tackling the root causes of child marriage. By focusing on education and awareness, the Court aims to ensure that future generations are better equipped to resist early marriage and protect their rights to education, health, and personal autonomy.

 

Date of Decision:October 18, 2024.

Society for Enlightenment and Voluntary Action & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

Latest Legal News