Order Taking Cognizance Must Reflect Application Of Mind; Section 197 CrPC Sanction Mandatory For Prosecuting Public Servants: Karnataka High Court Plaint Cannot Be Rejected Partially Against Specific Defendants Or Properties; Limitation Is A Triable Issue: Telangana High Court Employee Having National Trade Certificate & Prior Experience To Be Treated As 'Highly Skilled' For Compensation: Orissa High Court Insurance Company Entitled To Subpoena Investigating Officer For Vehicle Records When Insured Is Untraceable: Madras High Court Seller's Fraudulent Conduct & Non-Disclosure Of Mortgage Justify Refund Of Advance Sale Consideration: Kerala High Court Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act Filed By Partner On Behalf Of Firm Maintainable Even Without Specific Authorization Letter: Gujarat High Court Extension Of Remand Beyond 180 Days Under NDPS Act Requires Public Prosecutor's Independent Report, Not Just IO's Request: Andhra Pradesh High Court Orissa Grama Panchayats Act | No Bar On Rescheduling No-Confidence Motion Meeting Before Its Commencement: High Court Non-Preparation Of ‘Nil’ Seizure List After Searching Raiding Officer Not Fatal To NDPS Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Registration Of Trademark Confers Exclusive Right To Sue For Infringement Irrespective Of Whether Mark Is In Use: Delhi High Court Presence Of Magistrate Not Mandatory For Recording Dying Declaration; Conviction Can Be Based On DD Recorded By Police: Bombay High Court Routine Bank Transfers Between Spouses For Daily Needs Are Gratuitous Payments, Not Recoverable As Entrusted Funds: Kerala High Court Clerical Lapses Under Work Pressure Amount To Dereliction Of Duty, Not Crime: Madras High Court Quashes Corruption Case Against Deputy BDO Burden Of Proving Sale Deed Is Bona Fide Lies On Beneficiary If Executant Is Illiterate Or Vulnerable: Andhra Pradesh High Court Employee Cannot Take Advantage Of Own Delay; Employer Not Required To Preserve Disciplinary Records For Eternity: Bombay High Court Deadline To File Evidence Under Rule 45 Trade Marks Rules Is Directory, Registrar Can Extend Time Under Section 131: Bombay High Court Exclusion Of Interest In Insurance Policy Is Conditional; Insurer Must Plead & Prove Employer's Failure To Comply With Act To Avoid Liability: Kerala High Court Practicing Lawyer Entitled To Interim Maintenance From Husband If Income Is Insufficient To Maintain Standard Of Living: Orissa High Court Section 138 NI Act Offences Can Be Compounded At Any Stage Even After Dismissal Of Revision Or Appeal: Madras High Court Unsuccessful Party Seeking Post-Award Interim Relief Under Section 9 Faces 'Higher Threshold', Must Show Rare & Compelling Circumstances: Bombay High Court

Supreme Court Calls for Comprehensive Sexuality Education to Combat Child Marriage

20 October 2024 9:10 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


“Comprehensive sexuality education is key to empowering children and preventing child marriages.” - Supreme Court. In its judgment on October 18, 2024, in the case of Society for Enlightenment and Voluntary Action & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors., the Supreme Court of India underscored the need for integrating comprehensive sexuality education into school curricula as a crucial step in preventing child marriages. The Court directed all States and Union Territories (UTs) to implement education programs that inform children about their rights, reproductive health, and the social and legal consequences of child marriage.

"Education must empower children with the knowledge to resist harmful practices like child marriage."

The Supreme Court mandated that comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) must be introduced in schools across the country, in line with international guidelines such as those from the World Health Organization (WHO). This education should cover reproductive rights, gender equality, the legal aspects of marriage, and the physical and psychological consequences of early marriages. The Court stressed that age-appropriate, culturally sensitive content should be developed to ensure students fully understand their rights and the importance of delaying marriage until adulthood.

The Role of Education in Preventing Child Marriages:

The Court highlighted that many children, particularly girls, are unaware of their legal rights and the long-term consequences of early marriage. Comprehensive sexuality education will provide them with the tools to make informed decisions about their future, including understanding the risks of early marriage on health, education, and personal development. By integrating this education into the school system, the Court aims to empower young girls and boys to resist societal pressures and advocate for their rights.

Addressing Gender Inequality Through Education:

The Supreme Court emphasized that education is not merely a preventive tool but a transformative one. By teaching children about gender equality, personal autonomy, and reproductive health, comprehensive sexuality education challenges the traditional norms that perpetuate gender-based discrimination and the subjugation of women through child marriage.

"Education is a vital tool to break the cycle of child marriage and empower young girls to reclaim their future."

The Supreme Court's directive to incorporate comprehensive sexuality education into school curricula marks a significant step in tackling the root causes of child marriage. By focusing on education and awareness, the Court aims to ensure that future generations are better equipped to resist early marriage and protect their rights to education, health, and personal autonomy.

 

Date of Decision:October 18, 2024.

Society for Enlightenment and Voluntary Action & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

Latest Legal News