MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court: Bail in Murder Cases Requires Careful Consideration, Not Routine Grant

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 2 May 2023, The Supreme Court of India, in a recent judgement OMPRAKASH SAHNI Vs JAI SHANKAR CHAUDHARY & ANR. ETC., has emphasized that the grant of bail under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) in cases involving serious offences like murder should only be done in exceptional cases. The Court further stated that the power to grant bail under this provision should not be used as a matter of routine and should be exercised carefully and judiciously after considering all relevant factors.

The judgement was delivered by a bench comprising Justices M.R. Shah and J.B. Pardiwala, and pertained to a case involving the suspension of sentence and grant of bail to two convicts who had been sentenced to life imprisonment for murder.

The Court relied on previous judgements to lay down the principles governing the grant of bail under Section 389 of the CrPC in cases involving serious offences like murder. It held that the court must objectively assess the matter and record reasons for suspending the execution of the sentence and granting bail. The court should consider factors like the nature of the accusation, the manner in which the crime was committed, the gravity of the offence, and the desirability of releasing the accused on bail after conviction for committing the serious offence of murder.

The Court further stated that while undertaking the exercise to ascertain whether the convict has fair chances of acquittal, the Appellate Court should not re-appreciate the evidence at the stage of Section 389 of the CrPC and try to pick up few lacunas or loopholes here or there in the case of the prosecution. Such an approach would not be correct.

The Court also observed that any observations touching the merits of the case were purely for the purpose of deciding the present appeals and shall not be construed as an expression of the final opinion in the pending criminal appeals before the High Court.

The impugned order passed by the High Court was set aside, and the convicts were ordered to surrender before the Trial Court within a period of three days from the date of the judgement.

OMPRAKASH SAHNI Vs JAI SHANKAR CHAUDHARY & ANR. ETC.

Latest Legal News