Section 106 IEA Cannot Fill the Gaps in a Shaky Prosecution Case: Rajasthan High Court Rebukes Investigative Lapses in Murder Trial Accident Claim | Ration Card Cannot Decide a Man’s Age: Punjab & Haryana High Court Forgery in Wife’s Name and Defiance of Court Orders Amount to Contempt: Kerala High Court Limitation | Selectively Active Litigant Cannot Seek Liberal Condonation: Delhi High Court Refuses to Revive 1589 Days’ Delay Mere Unnatural Death Within Seven Months Is Not Dowry Death: Delhi High Court Refuses to Reverse Acquittal in Ruby Hanging Case A Partition Suit Is a Suit for Land: Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint for Want of Clause XII Leave Senior Citizens Act Cannot Be A Shortcut To Reclaim Property Registered In Wife's Name: Bombay High Court State Bound By Its Concession; More Meritorious Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment: Supreme Court Balances Equity In Rajasthan Grade III Teacher Recruitment Penalty For Delayed Compensation Is The Employer's Personal Fault — Insurance Company Cannot Be Made To Pay For The Employer's Own Default: Supreme Court Bail Cannot Be a Mechanical Exercise in Murder and Atrocities Cases: Supreme Court Cancels Bail Granted on ‘Extraneous Considerations’ Even A Lathi Becomes A Murder Weapon When Repeatedly Aimed At The Head With Bone-Deep Force: Supreme Court Applies The Virsa Singh Test To Demolish The Defence That Lathis Are Not Deadly Weapons Section 149 IPC While Demanding Proof Of Individual Fatal Blow Runs Contrary To The Very Principle Of Vicarious Liability: Supreme Court Statement Under Section 108 Is Substantive Evidence If Voluntary:  Supreme Court Upholds Conviction In Smuggling Case U.P. Anti-Conversion Act Does Not Apply To Interfaith Live-In Relationships Unless Actual Conversion Is Intended: Allahabad High Court Section 480(6) BNSS | If Trial Is Not Concluded Within Sixty Days… Such Person Shall Be Released On Bail: MP High Court Bombay High Court Lifts Stay on Banks’ Fraud Proceedings Against Anil Ambani Preventive Detention Cannot Survive Without Supplying Relied Upon Documents: Karnataka High Court Reasserts Article 22(5) Safeguards Court Subordinate Who Attended Duty Drunk, Abused Advocates & Misbehaved With Judge's Family Gets No Mercy: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Removal From Service XXXVII Rule 3 CPC | Claim Of 24% Interest Without Prima Facie Contract Cannot Be Blindly Accepted In Summary Proceedings : Madras High Court On Summary Suit Defence Re-Testing Under NDPS Act Cannot Be a Tool to Overcome an Adverse Lab Report: J&K High Court Quashes Charge-Sheet After First Report Ruled Out Heroin Shocking And Disturbing That Cows Died Due To Starvation: Kerala High Court Pulls Up Travancore Devaswom Board Over Neglect Of Temple Gosala Promoter Cannot Retain Ownership By Merely Using The Word ‘Lease’: Bombay High Court Upholds Ownership Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA

SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE – DISMISSED – FAILED TO EXAMINE HANDWRITING EXPERT IN PROVING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT – PH HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed an appeal and highlighted the crucial role of a handwriting expert in establishing the execution of an agreement and stated that “The plaintiff indeed omitted examining a handwriting expert... Without such examination, the case of the plaintiff suffered a big jolt.” The case, RSA-3421 of 2012 (O&M), involved a dispute between Bakshish Singh and Kanwaljit Singh and another party.

The court, presided over by Justice H.S. Madaan, emphasized that the plaintiff, Bakshish Singh, failed to prove the execution of the agreement to sell the land in question. The judgment stated, “The plaintiff indeed omitted examining a handwriting expert. If such an expert, after examining the disputed signatures of Kanwaljit Singh with his specimen/admitted signatures, had arrived at the conclusion that those were by the same person, that would have strengthened the case of the plaintiff.”

The court further noted that the agreement’s execution was not established, and therefore, the question of granting specific performance did not arise. The trial court’s judgment, which had decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, was deemed erroneous. The appellate court correctly set aside the trial court’s decision and dismissed the suit.

Justice Madaan, while upholding the appellate court’s judgment, remarked, “The execution of agreement Ex.P1 is not established on the record; therefore, there is no question of any specific performance thereof being granted in favor of the appellant/plaintiff.”

The importance of a handwriting expert in establishing the authenticity of signatures on legal documents was highlighted in the judgment. The court underscored that in cases where a party denies their signatures, it is incumbent upon the plaintiff to present a handwriting expert for a thorough analysis.

Date of Decision: May 24, 2023

Bakshish Singh  VS Kanwaljit Singh and another

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Bakshish-Vs-Kawaljeet-26-May-23-PH-HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News