Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE – DISMISSED – FAILED TO EXAMINE HANDWRITING EXPERT IN PROVING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT – PH HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed an appeal and highlighted the crucial role of a handwriting expert in establishing the execution of an agreement and stated that “The plaintiff indeed omitted examining a handwriting expert... Without such examination, the case of the plaintiff suffered a big jolt.” The case, RSA-3421 of 2012 (O&M), involved a dispute between Bakshish Singh and Kanwaljit Singh and another party.

The court, presided over by Justice H.S. Madaan, emphasized that the plaintiff, Bakshish Singh, failed to prove the execution of the agreement to sell the land in question. The judgment stated, “The plaintiff indeed omitted examining a handwriting expert. If such an expert, after examining the disputed signatures of Kanwaljit Singh with his specimen/admitted signatures, had arrived at the conclusion that those were by the same person, that would have strengthened the case of the plaintiff.”

The court further noted that the agreement’s execution was not established, and therefore, the question of granting specific performance did not arise. The trial court’s judgment, which had decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, was deemed erroneous. The appellate court correctly set aside the trial court’s decision and dismissed the suit.

Justice Madaan, while upholding the appellate court’s judgment, remarked, “The execution of agreement Ex.P1 is not established on the record; therefore, there is no question of any specific performance thereof being granted in favor of the appellant/plaintiff.”

The importance of a handwriting expert in establishing the authenticity of signatures on legal documents was highlighted in the judgment. The court underscored that in cases where a party denies their signatures, it is incumbent upon the plaintiff to present a handwriting expert for a thorough analysis.

Date of Decision: May 24, 2023

Bakshish Singh  VS Kanwaljit Singh and another

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Bakshish-Vs-Kawaljeet-26-May-23-PH-HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News