Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Once a Court Declares a Department an Industry Under Section 2(j), State Cannot Raise the Same Objection Again: Gujarat High Court Slams Repetitive Litigation by Irrigation Department “How Could Cheques Issued in 2020 Be Mentioned in a 2019 Contract?”: Delhi High Court Grants Injunction in Forged MOA Case, Slams Prima Facie Fabrication Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC Sole Testimony of Prosecutrix, If Credible, Is Enough to Convict: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Cheque Issued as Security Still Attracts Section 138 NI Act If Liability Exists on Date of Presentation: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity Law of Limitation Binds All Equally, Including the State: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Review Petition with 5743 Days’ Delay Once Selected, All Are Equals: Allahabad High Court Slams State for Withholding Pay Protection From Later Batches of Ex-Servicemen Constables Non-Compliance With Section 42 of NDPS Act Is Fatal to Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court Acquits Two Accused In 160 Kg Poppy Husk Case Unregistered Agreement Creating Right of Way Inadmissible in Evidence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Summary Decree in Partition Suit Denied: Unequivocal Admissions Absent, Full Trial Necessary: Delhi High Court No Court Can Allow Itself to Be Used as an Instrument of Fraud: Delhi High Court Exposes Forged Writ Petition Filed in Name of Unaware Citizen "Deliberate Wage Splitting to Evade Provident Fund Dues Is Illegal": Bombay High Court Restores PF Authority's 7A Order Against Saket College and Centrum Direct Anti-Suit Injunction in Matrimonial Dispute Set Aside: Calcutta High Court Refuses to Stall UK Divorce Proceedings Filed by Wife

Sudden Provocation During a Card Game Sparks Fatal Stabbing: Kerala HC Reduces Conviction to Culpable Homicide

10 October 2024 11:24 AM

By: sayum


Kerala High Court, in a recent judgement, reduced the conviction of Gopi, the first accused, from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC. His sentence was reduced to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment for fatally stabbing a fellow card player, Sainul Abideen, in 2009. Two other co-accused, Shamsudheen and Anil Kumar, were acquitted as the court found insufficient evidence of their involvement.

The High Court found that the stabbing occurred after the victim, Sainul Abideen, cheated during a card game and provoked Gopi by kicking him. Gopi, in a fit of rage, fatally stabbed the victim with a file. The court ruled that this act resulted from grave and sudden provocation, reducing his conviction from murder to culpable homicide under Section 304 Part I IPC.

On March 21, 2009, Gopi and four others were playing cards after drinking toddy. The victim was caught cheating, leading to a physical altercation during which Gopi stabbed him. The trial court had convicted Gopi and two others for murder under Section 302 IPC, sentencing them to life imprisonment.

The primary issue was whether the accused committed murder with a common intention or whether the act was a result of provocation, reducing the crime to culpable homicide.

The court noted that Gopi had been provoked by the victim’s cheating and subsequent assault, which led to the fatal stabbing. This sudden provocation diminished Gopi’s criminal liability.

There was no evidence showing that the co-accused, Shamsudheen and Anil Kumar, shared a common intention with Gopi to kill the victim, leading to their acquittal.

The court reduced Gopi’s conviction to Section 304 Part I IPC and sentenced him to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment with a fine of ₹50,000. The co-accused were acquitted, as the evidence was insufficient to prove their participation in the fatal attack.

"The 1st accused acted under grave and sudden provocation, thus reducing his criminal liability from murder to culpable homicide."

The Kerala High Court’s ruling highlights the role of provocation in mitigating murder charges, while also emphasizing the need for clear evidence of common intent to implicate co-accused in such cases.

Date of Decision: October 9, 2024

Gopi @ Gopu vs. State of Kerala

Latest Legal News