MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Sudden Provocation During a Card Game Sparks Fatal Stabbing: Kerala HC Reduces Conviction to Culpable Homicide

10 October 2024 11:24 AM

By: sayum


Kerala High Court, in a recent judgement, reduced the conviction of Gopi, the first accused, from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC. His sentence was reduced to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment for fatally stabbing a fellow card player, Sainul Abideen, in 2009. Two other co-accused, Shamsudheen and Anil Kumar, were acquitted as the court found insufficient evidence of their involvement.

The High Court found that the stabbing occurred after the victim, Sainul Abideen, cheated during a card game and provoked Gopi by kicking him. Gopi, in a fit of rage, fatally stabbed the victim with a file. The court ruled that this act resulted from grave and sudden provocation, reducing his conviction from murder to culpable homicide under Section 304 Part I IPC.

On March 21, 2009, Gopi and four others were playing cards after drinking toddy. The victim was caught cheating, leading to a physical altercation during which Gopi stabbed him. The trial court had convicted Gopi and two others for murder under Section 302 IPC, sentencing them to life imprisonment.

The primary issue was whether the accused committed murder with a common intention or whether the act was a result of provocation, reducing the crime to culpable homicide.

The court noted that Gopi had been provoked by the victim’s cheating and subsequent assault, which led to the fatal stabbing. This sudden provocation diminished Gopi’s criminal liability.

There was no evidence showing that the co-accused, Shamsudheen and Anil Kumar, shared a common intention with Gopi to kill the victim, leading to their acquittal.

The court reduced Gopi’s conviction to Section 304 Part I IPC and sentenced him to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment with a fine of ₹50,000. The co-accused were acquitted, as the evidence was insufficient to prove their participation in the fatal attack.

"The 1st accused acted under grave and sudden provocation, thus reducing his criminal liability from murder to culpable homicide."

The Kerala High Court’s ruling highlights the role of provocation in mitigating murder charges, while also emphasizing the need for clear evidence of common intent to implicate co-accused in such cases.

Date of Decision: October 9, 2024

Gopi @ Gopu vs. State of Kerala

Latest Legal News