Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

Statements in Court Filings Amount to Publication, Attract Defamation Under IPC: Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has held that defamatory statements made in court filings amount to publication, thus attracting the provisions of defamation under the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The decision came in the case of Xavier Pollayil Vs. C.H. Chandrabhanu & State of Kerala, where Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. dismissed a petition seeking to quash proceedings for defamation.

The crux of the judgment centered around whether statements made in a counter-affidavit submitted before a court of law could be considered as 'publication' under sections 499 and 500 of the IPC, which deal with defamation.

The case arose from a complaint by C.H. Chandrabhanu, a lawyer, alleging defamation by Xavier Pollayil, the petitioner and former Secretary of the Rotary Club, Cherthala. Pollayil had made certain statements in his counter affidavits regarding a lawsuit related to the termination of membership from the Rotary Club. The complainant argued that these statements were defamatory.

Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. meticulously analyzed the case, referring to various precedents. He observed, "Merely because the statement happened to be made in a counter affidavit submitted before a court of law, that would not enable the accused to contend that the same is not a publication which attracts the offence under Section 499 r/w. Section 500 of IPC." The Judge also noted that determining whether a statement falls under the exceptions of Section 499 IPC requires a trial and cannot be adjudicated in a proceeding under Section 482 Cr.PC.

The High Court rejected the petition to quash the proceedings, stating that the issues raised are matters for trial. The Court emphasized that its observations were not intended to decide any issues between the parties but to assess the prima facie case for invoking the Court's inherent powers.

Date of Decision: 16 February 2024

Xavier Pollayil VS C.H.Chandrabhanu

Latest Legal News