Supreme Court Introduces Professional Bail Bondsperson Rules 2026 To Curb Rampant Fake Sureties Supreme Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines For Foreign Nationals In NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases, Mandates Passport Deposition And Strict Surety Verification Supreme Court Issues Mandatory Guidelines To Curb Black Money In Elections, Directs Fast-Track Disposal Of Criminal Cases Against MPs And MLAs Same Set of Depositions Cannot Lead to Conviction of Some Accused and Acquittal of Others Without Distinct Reasoning: Supreme Court Victims Have Equal Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial: Supreme Court Section 12 Of Gangsters Act Does Not Freeze Other Parallel Proceedings, Its Sole Purpose Is To Resolve Clash Of Dates: Supreme Court Registration of a Will Does Not Dispense With Mandatory Proof of Execution and Attestation Under Section 68 of Evidence Act: Supreme Court Arbitration Pre-Deposit Clause Requiring Contractor To Deposit 10% Of Claim Amount Prior To Reference Violates Right To Sue And Article 14: Supreme Court Income Tax Settlement Order Passed Beyond Mandatory 18-Month Limitation Period Is Void, Rules Allahabad High Court Teacher's Abuse of Trust is Grave Concern, Not Mere Breach of Discipline: Delhi High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction, Raps School Principal For Discouraging Child Victim 'NO AID OF INTERPRETER, NO VIDEOGRAPHY': Gauhati High Court Acquits Man In Rape Case Involving Mentally Disabled Victim, Rules S.164 CrPC Statement Inadmissible Due To Procedural Non-Compliance Karnataka High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Refund of Trap Money to Complainants Property Purchased Jointly By Husband And Wife Cannot Be Regarded As Ancestral Merely Because Co-Executants Signed Prior Sale Deed: Madras High Court Judicial Magistrate Holding Section 176(1A) CrPC Inquiry Is Empowered To Name Perpetrators Of Custodial Death: Madhya Pradesh High Court 'Mere Maintenance Order Cannot Prove Marriage Validity': Patna High Court Declares Woman Not Legally Wedded Wife For Failing To Prove 'Saptapadi' Under Hindu Marriage Act Woman Accused Under PMLA Is Exempt From Twin Conditions But Bail Depends On Facts, Not Gender Alone: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Stale Claims Cannot Be Revived After Significant Delay: Punjab and Haryana High Court Dismisses 14-Year-Old Writ Petition for Promotional Increment Due to Delay

11 October 2024 11:11 AM

By: sayum


Punjab and Haryana High Court in Darshan Singh v. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited dismissed a writ petition seeking promotional increments, filed 14 years after the petitioner’s retirement. The court ruled that the petitioner, Darshan Singh, could not agitate a stale issue after such an inordinate delay, reaffirming the legal principle that claims must be raised within a reasonable time to prevent prejudice to the other party.

The petitioner, Darshan Singh, was employed as a Lower Division Clerk with Punjab State Power Corporation and retired in 2010. He filed a petition in 2024, claiming promotional increments that he argued were due after 23 years of service but were never granted. The petitioner claimed discrimination, as other similarly placed employees had received the benefit.

Delay and Laches: The court emphasized that the petitioner had failed to raise his claims in a timely manner, waiting 14 years after retirement to file the petition. The court relied on previous judgments, stating that extraordinary writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked for stale claims, particularly when the delay is unexplained​.

No Continuous Cause of Action: The petitioner argued that the delay should be excused due to the ongoing nature of the financial harm he faced. The court rejected this, noting that the petitioner had not actively pursued his rights during his service or immediately after retirement​.

The High Court dismissed the petition, stating that the petitioner’s long delay in raising his claim deprived him of any relief. The court highlighted the principle that those who sleep on their rights cannot expect relief after allowing substantial time to pass​.

This judgment reinforces the importance of timely action in legal matters, particularly when challenging administrative decisions regarding employment benefits. It reaffirms that courts will not entertain claims raised after an unreasonable and unexplained delay.

Date of Decision: October 1, 2024

Darshan Singh v. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited​.

Latest Legal News