Law Does Not Countenance Resurrection Of Stale Claims Through Inventive Drafting: Karnataka High Court Rejects 20-Year-Old Partition Dispute CPC Provisions Cannot Be Used to Transfer Consumer Complaints Across States: NCDRC Invokes Section 62 to End Forum-Shifting Ordeal in Nirmal Spinning Mills Case FSSA Provisions Prevail Over PFA Act In Cases Of Overlapping Jurisdiction, Prosecution Under Old Act Impermissible: J&K High Court Motive Pales Into Significance When Direct Ocular Evidence Establishes Crime; Enmity Is A Double-Edged Sword: Allahabad High Court Plaintiff Cannot Succeed Merely On Weakness Of Defence; Initial Burden To Prove Claim Rests On Claimant: Madras High Court Witness Threats Noted By Higher Courts Disentitle Convict To Suspension Of Sentence: Gujarat High Court Family Court Orders Must Be Enforced Immediately, Pendency Of Applications No Excuse For Disobedience: Delhi High Court 'Fraud And Justice Never Dwell Together': Karnataka High Court Reverses Order To Grant Land Based On Fabricated Records Development Authority Competent To Sanction Land Use Conversion From Residential To Nursing Home If Permitted Under Master Plan & Zoning Regulations: Allahabad High Court Notification Changing Import Policy From 'Free' To 'Restricted' Operative Only From Exact Time Of Publication In E-Gazette: Delhi High Court On Name Of Protection of the Complainer Excluding Relevant Defence Evidence in Sexual Offences Trials May Breach Fair Trial Rights: UK Supreme Court Boundaries In Sale Deed Prevail Over Discrepancy In Property Description; Adverse Possession Begins From Date Of Hostile Notice: Punjab & Haryana HC Supreme Court of UK Upholds HMRC Decision: Professional Fees Incurred by Investment Holding Company Are Capital Expenditure Criminal Law Cannot Be Used To Silence Citizens Questioning Legality Of Police Action: Madras High Court Quashes Obstruction Case Punjab & Haryana High Court Directs Centre To Treat Ashok Khemka As Empaneled For Future Assignments, Says Denying Relaxation Granted To Peers Is Discriminatory Section 34 Court Cannot Substitute Arbitrator’s Plausible View With Its Own; Not Bound By Technical Rules Of Evidence Act: Madras High Court Article 227 Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Reopen Decrees Finalized Four Decades Ago: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Challenge To 1985 Order Daughter Has No Right To Inherit Agricultural Land If Succession Opened Before 2005 HSA Amendment: Delhi High Court Rejects Plaint Indian Trust Act Inapplicable To Public Religious Endowments; Sale Of Charity Property Without HR&CE Commissioner's Permission Void: Madras High Court Supreme Court Clarifies Status of Collateral Warranties Under Construction Contracts FIR Quashed Against Newsclick: PMLA Proceedings Cannot Stand Alone Without A Predicate Offence, Rules Delhi High Court Assessee Claiming TDS Exemption On "Reimbursement" To Non-Residents Must Obtain Mandatory Tax Determination Under Section 195(2): Madras High Court

Special Agreement between Guatemala and Belize: ICJ

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


D.D: 24 June 2022

Regarding Article 48 of the Statute of the Court and Articles 44 and 46 of the Rules of Court, Regarding the "Special Agreement between Guatemala and Belize to Submit Guatemala's Territorial, Insular, and Maritime Claim to the International Court of Justice" of 8 December 2008 (hereinafter the "Special Agreement") and the Protocol thereto of 25 May 2015 (hereinafter the "Protocol"),

Having regard to the Order of 18 June 2019 in which the Court, referring to Article 3, paragraph 2, of the Special Agreement and to Article 3 of the Protocol, fixed 8 June 2020 and 8 June 2021, respectively, as the deadlines for the filing of the initial pleadings in the case, namely a Memorial by the Republic of Guatemala and a Counter-Memorial by Belize, the Court hereby extends the filing deadlines for the initial pleadings to 8 June 2021.

Having regard to the Order of 22 April 2020, by which the Court extended to 8 December 2020 and 8 June 2022 the respective time-limits for the filing of the Memorial of the Republic of Guatemala and of the Counter-Memorial of Belize; Having regard to the fact that the Memorial and the Counter-Memorial were filed within the extended time-limits; Having regard to the fact that, pursuant to Article 3, paragraph 2, subparagraphs (c) and (d), of the Special Agreement, the

Fixes the following deadlines for the filing of subsequent pleadings in the case: 8 December 2022 for the Republic of Guatemala's Reply and 8 June 2023 for Belize's Rejoinder; and reserving further action on the subsequent procedure.

 

Guatemala  Versus  Belize

Latest Legal News