Supreme Court Strikes Down Expulsion of Bihar MLC as Disproportionate, Orders Immediate Reinstatement Private Banks Not Subject to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226: Punjab & Haryana High Court Mere Allegation of Forgery is Not Enough: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute When a Case is Made Out for Bail, Courts Should Not Hesitate: Kerala High Court Allows Bail Despite Commercial Quantity of Drugs Seized Retailers Cannot Be Prosecuted for Manufacturer’s Fault" – Karnataka High Court Quashes Case Against Pesticide Dealers Mere Issuance of a Cheque Does Not Prove Legally Enforceable Debt": Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonor Case Courts Cannot Ignore Urgent Repairs When Public Safety is at Stake: Calcutta High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Ownership: Bombay High Court Rejects Premature Dismissal of Partition Suit No Substantial Question of Law – High Court Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence Under Section 100 CPC: Andhra Pradesh High Court Injunction Cannot Be Granted Without Proof of Possession: Allahabad High Court Quashes Relief in Land Dispute Section 197 CrPC | Sanction for Prosecution is a Shield, Not a Sword: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Case Against BIS Officer Landlord is the Best Judge of His Needs: Supreme Court Orders Eviction in Favor of Landowner Vijaya Bank TT Scam | Supreme Court Acquits Jeweller in ₹6.7 Crore Vijaya Bank Fraud Case, Orders Return of 205 Gold Bars Procurement Preference for Small Enterprises is a Legal Mandate, Not a Mere Policy: Supreme Court Rules in Favor of MSMEs Revisional Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked Against Interlocutory Orders of Commercial Courts: Orissa High Court Declares Section 8 Bar Absolute Victim’s Testimony Must Be of Sterling Quality to Be Sole Basis of Conviction: Kerala High Court Reduces Sentence of Pastor Convicted for Repeated Rape of Minor Providing Set-Top Boxes to Subscribers Constitutes Sale”: Karnataka High Court Upholds VAT on Tata Play Limited Mere Registration of FIR Cannot Justify Denial of Passport Renewal: Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court

Special Agreement between Guatemala and Belize: ICJ

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


D.D: 24 June 2022

Regarding Article 48 of the Statute of the Court and Articles 44 and 46 of the Rules of Court, Regarding the "Special Agreement between Guatemala and Belize to Submit Guatemala's Territorial, Insular, and Maritime Claim to the International Court of Justice" of 8 December 2008 (hereinafter the "Special Agreement") and the Protocol thereto of 25 May 2015 (hereinafter the "Protocol"),

Having regard to the Order of 18 June 2019 in which the Court, referring to Article 3, paragraph 2, of the Special Agreement and to Article 3 of the Protocol, fixed 8 June 2020 and 8 June 2021, respectively, as the deadlines for the filing of the initial pleadings in the case, namely a Memorial by the Republic of Guatemala and a Counter-Memorial by Belize, the Court hereby extends the filing deadlines for the initial pleadings to 8 June 2021.

Having regard to the Order of 22 April 2020, by which the Court extended to 8 December 2020 and 8 June 2022 the respective time-limits for the filing of the Memorial of the Republic of Guatemala and of the Counter-Memorial of Belize; Having regard to the fact that the Memorial and the Counter-Memorial were filed within the extended time-limits; Having regard to the fact that, pursuant to Article 3, paragraph 2, subparagraphs (c) and (d), of the Special Agreement, the

Fixes the following deadlines for the filing of subsequent pleadings in the case: 8 December 2022 for the Republic of Guatemala's Reply and 8 June 2023 for Belize's Rejoinder; and reserving further action on the subsequent procedure.

 

Guatemala  Versus  Belize

Similar News