SARFAESI Act | Sale Certificate Cannot Be Issued In Favour Of A Third-Party Nominee Who Was Not The Auction Bidder: Supreme Court SARFAESI Act | Auction Sale Conducted In Violation Of Mandatory Rules And Subsisting Restraint Order Is Vitiated In Law: Supreme Court Recovery Of Alleged Overpayment From A Separate, Unrelated Contract Without Notice Violates Principles Of Natural Justice: Supreme Court IBC | Adjudicating Authority Has Power To Recall CIRP Admission Order If It Was Obtained Through Fraud Or Collusion: Supreme Court Section 138 NI Act | Presumption Of Service Is Attracted Once Notice Is Dispatched To Correct Address Of Drawer: Supreme Court Operation Of Hookah Bars In Restaurants Constitutes Violation Of Rule 4(3) Of COTPA Rules: Allahabad High Court High Court Cannot Recall Order Passed On Merits Even If Passed Ex-Parte: Bombay High Court Administrative Authorities Cannot Pass Orders Having Civil Consequences Without Meaningful Consideration Of The Affected Employee’s Response: Allahabad High Court Discharge Application Cannot Be Converted Into A 'Mini-Trial' To Assess Evidentiary Sufficiency: Andhra Pradesh High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Allegations Are Falsified By Documents Annexed To Plaint Or Based On Non-Existent Law: Bombay High Court Police Cannot Interfere In Pending Civil Disputes Or Act As Arbitrators In Private Property Conflicts: Andhra Pradesh High Court Contract For Personal Services Between Doctor And Hospital Is Determinable And Not Specifically Enforceable: Calcutta High Court Allegations Of Sexual Offences Cannot Be Quashed Based On Contradictory Evidence Requiring Mini-Trial: Delhi High Court PMLA Adjudication | Failure To Expressly Discuss Every Submission In Written Synopsis Does Not Vitiate Order Under Principles Of Natural Justice: Karnataka High Court Prolonged Separation Of Sixteen Years Constitutes Cruelty Under Special Marriage Act: Kerala High Court Grants Divorce Order XII Rule 6 CPC | Decree Of Possession Can Be Granted On Admissions Even If Relationship Of Landlord-Tenant Is Disputed: Delhi High Court Non-Framing Of Issues Under Order XIV CPC Does Not Vitiate Trial Unless Prejudice Is Proved: Madras High Court Order 47 Rule 1 CPC | Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Cure Failure To Produce Evidence That Was Within Knowledge Of Applicant: Madhya Pradesh High Court Codicil To A Will Must Be Proved Like A Will; Propounder Must Remove All Suspicious Circumstances: Punjab & Haryana High Court Mere Lodging Of Section 498-A IPC Case Not Cruelty: Telangana High Court Sets Aside Divorce Decree Order XVII Rule 3 CPC | Power To Dismiss Suit For Default Of Evidence Is Drastic And Must Be Exercised Sparingly: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Son, Who Has Been Married Several Times Without Divorcing A Disabled Wife, Denies Anticipatory Bail To His Father For Allegedly Colluding: PB & HR HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Punjab and Haryana High Court, in denying anticipatory bail to the father in a case where he allegedly acted in connivance with his son who solemnised multiple marriages without obtaining a divorce from his disabled spouse, ruled that the petitioner must be interrogated in custody due to the gravity of the allegation and to determine the truth.

In light of the gravity of the allegation and the need to discover the truth about his son's multiple marriages, the petitioner must be questioned under oath.

The bench comprised of Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi added that the petitioner is a signatory to multiple documents indicating he was aware of his son's multiple marriages to different women.

In addition, the court noted that there are photographs of the petitioner at his son's various marriages to different women.

The complainant asserted that the Petitioner's son married his sister (80% disabled) in 2001, and two children were born out of wedlock. One of the children was 90% handicapped. He claimed that his in-laws abandoned his sister and her children, and that the Petitioner's son married five times without a divorce from his sister.

The complainant alleged that the actions were carried out in collusion with the Petitioner, thus defrauding not only the Petitioner's sister but also other women.

After considering that both the petitioner's daughter-in-law and grandson are physically disabled, the court determined that a custodial interrogation is necessary in light of the gravity of the allegation and in order to discover the truth about the petitioner's son's multiple marriages.

Consequently, the court denies his request for the granting of anticipatory bail.

D.D: 16 June 2022

Ajaib Singh

V/s

State of Punjab 

 

Latest Legal News