"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

Son, Who Has Been Married Several Times Without Divorcing A Disabled Wife, Denies Anticipatory Bail To His Father For Allegedly Colluding: PB & HR HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Punjab and Haryana High Court, in denying anticipatory bail to the father in a case where he allegedly acted in connivance with his son who solemnised multiple marriages without obtaining a divorce from his disabled spouse, ruled that the petitioner must be interrogated in custody due to the gravity of the allegation and to determine the truth.

In light of the gravity of the allegation and the need to discover the truth about his son's multiple marriages, the petitioner must be questioned under oath.

The bench comprised of Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi added that the petitioner is a signatory to multiple documents indicating he was aware of his son's multiple marriages to different women.

In addition, the court noted that there are photographs of the petitioner at his son's various marriages to different women.

The complainant asserted that the Petitioner's son married his sister (80% disabled) in 2001, and two children were born out of wedlock. One of the children was 90% handicapped. He claimed that his in-laws abandoned his sister and her children, and that the Petitioner's son married five times without a divorce from his sister.

The complainant alleged that the actions were carried out in collusion with the Petitioner, thus defrauding not only the Petitioner's sister but also other women.

After considering that both the petitioner's daughter-in-law and grandson are physically disabled, the court determined that a custodial interrogation is necessary in light of the gravity of the allegation and in order to discover the truth about the petitioner's son's multiple marriages.

Consequently, the court denies his request for the granting of anticipatory bail.

D.D: 16 June 2022

Ajaib Singh

V/s

State of Punjab 

 

Similar News