CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Son, Who Has Been Married Several Times Without Divorcing A Disabled Wife, Denies Anticipatory Bail To His Father For Allegedly Colluding: PB & HR HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Punjab and Haryana High Court, in denying anticipatory bail to the father in a case where he allegedly acted in connivance with his son who solemnised multiple marriages without obtaining a divorce from his disabled spouse, ruled that the petitioner must be interrogated in custody due to the gravity of the allegation and to determine the truth.

In light of the gravity of the allegation and the need to discover the truth about his son's multiple marriages, the petitioner must be questioned under oath.

The bench comprised of Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi added that the petitioner is a signatory to multiple documents indicating he was aware of his son's multiple marriages to different women.

In addition, the court noted that there are photographs of the petitioner at his son's various marriages to different women.

The complainant asserted that the Petitioner's son married his sister (80% disabled) in 2001, and two children were born out of wedlock. One of the children was 90% handicapped. He claimed that his in-laws abandoned his sister and her children, and that the Petitioner's son married five times without a divorce from his sister.

The complainant alleged that the actions were carried out in collusion with the Petitioner, thus defrauding not only the Petitioner's sister but also other women.

After considering that both the petitioner's daughter-in-law and grandson are physically disabled, the court determined that a custodial interrogation is necessary in light of the gravity of the allegation and in order to discover the truth about the petitioner's son's multiple marriages.

Consequently, the court denies his request for the granting of anticipatory bail.

D.D: 16 June 2022

Ajaib Singh

V/s

State of Punjab 

 

Latest Legal News