MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Solely Implicated Based On The Disclosure Statement Of  Co-Accused: High Court Grants Bail in NDPS Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent decision, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Akashdeep Singh, who was implicated in a drug case under the stringent Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, presiding over the matter, observed that “further incarceration of the petitioner is not required,” marking a pivotal moment in the case that has garnered attention due to its implications on bail laws in NDPS cases.

The petitioner was seeking bail in connection with FIR No.43, registered at Police Station Kahnuwan, District Gurdaspur, under Sections 22 and later 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. The case pivoted on the fact that Akashdeep Singh was solely implicated based on the disclosure statement of a co-accused, with no corroborative evidence or recovery from him.

In his judgement, Justice Bedi noted, “the petitioner is named in the disclosure statement of his co-accused and no recovery whatsoever has been effected from him.” This observation was crucial in determining the course of the trial, as it underscored the lack of direct evidence against the petitioner.

The court’s decision was also influenced by various precedents where bail was granted under similar circumstances. These cases emphasized the importance of corroborative evidence in addition to a co-accused’s disclosure, a principle that played a significant role in this judgement.

Advocates Rajesh Kapila and Himani Kapila represented the petitioner, while Deputy Advocate General Ms. Ramta K Chaudhary represented the State of Punjab. Their arguments highlighted the nuances of the NDPS Act and the importance of personal liberty in bail considerations.

The judgement is seen as a beacon of hope for those implicated in NDPS cases on tenuous grounds. It underscores the judiciary’s balanced approach in upholding the rights of the accused while considering the seriousness of the allegations. As the trial continues, this ruling will undoubtedly be a significant reference point for future bail applications under the NDPS Act.

Date of Decision: 07 November 2023

Akashdeep Singh. VS State of Punjab.     

Latest Legal News