Promotees Allowed to Challenge Provisional Seniority List in Dispute Between Direct Recruitment and Promotion: Kerala High Court Frivolous Defenses Cannot Justify Leave to Defend Under Order XXXVII CPC Delhi High Court Candidates Merely Enrolled in Final Year B.V.Sc. Program Ineligible for Veterinary Officer Recruitment: Rajasthan High Court Manufacturing or Sale of Garments Does Not Attract Copyright Protection; Procedural Violations Under Trade Marks Act Renders Prosecution Unsustainable: P&H High Court Ownership Alone Is Not Sufficient to Maintain Eviction Suit; Plaintiff Must Qualify as a Lessor Under Lease Agreement: Calcutta High Court Findings Based on Evidence Cannot Be Interfered With in a Second Appeal Without Substantial Question of Law: AP High Court Chain of Circumstances Broken: Inferences Cannot Replace Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Kerala High Court Bail | Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 of the Constitution: Bombay High Court Encroachment on a Common Lane Gives Rise to Recurring Cause of Action: Madras High Court Holds Limitation Act Inapplicable to Pathway Disputes Reproductive Autonomy Includes the Right to Abort Without Spousal Consent: P&H High Court Access to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 is Not an Absolute Bar Against MSEFC Awards: Supreme Court Refers Key Questions on Writ Jurisdiction to Larger Bench Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted for Title and Mortgage Disputes Under SARFAESI Act: Supreme Court Principle of Bail is the Rule, Jail is the Exception: Supreme Court Panchayat Law | Mandatory Compliance With Section 34 And Rule 3 Is Non-Negotiable In Resignation Cases: Bombay High Court Quashes Resignation Of Upa-Sarpanch Recovery of Bullet Fired from Accused’s Weapon Crucial: PH High Court Reaffirms Conviction in Murder Case Injured Witness Evidence Carries Built-in Reliability Unless Contradicted Significantly: Kerala High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Murder Case Civil Dispute with Criminal Elements Cannot Be Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.: Karnataka High Court Issuance of Summons Under Section 91 CrPC During Preliminary Verification is Without Jurisdiction: High Court of J&K and Ladakh Article 21 Prevails Over NDPS Act’s Section 37 Restrictions in Cases of Prolonged Incarceration: Delhi High Court Once a Property is Waqf, It Remains Waqf Perpetually: Calcutta High Court Affirms No Secular Ownership Can Derive from Waqf Properties Surveillance Without Opportunity to Object Violates Articles 14, 19, and 21: Allahabad High Court Quashes Class-B History Sheets Mandatory Provisions of Order XXI CPC Were Violated, Rendering the Auction Sale Illegal: Punjab and Haryana High Court

Sexual Assault on Minor Children is One of the Most Heinous Crimes”: High Court Upholds Conviction Under POCSO Act

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Judicature at Madras upheld the conviction of a painter, Ramakrishna alias Ramki, for sexually assaulting a 4½-year-old girl. The accused was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment and fined Rs. 5,000/- under Section 6 @ 10 of the POCSO Act, 2012.

Justice R. Hemalatha, in her judgment dated 04.08.2023, emphasized the gravity of the crime, stating, “sexual assault on minor children is one of the most heinous crimes which need very stringent punishment to curb the menace.”

The incident occurred on 19.04.2018, when the accused sexually assaulted the young victim. The appeal was filed contending non-examination of vital witnesses and contradictions in statements. However, the court found the evidence of the victim convincing and criticized the defense counsel for posing inappropriate questions to the young victim.

The court also expressed deep concern over the safety of young girls in society, observing, “In a developing country riddled with taboos and biases, we have seen women emerging out of the shell of ignorance and illiteracy. But, such incidents only make us feel that the future of young girls is unsafe.”

Justice Hemalatha further noted that “Sexual abuse, drugs, and alcohol are the three deep malaises that ruin a society and never allow development of the country.” She called for strict laws and effective implementation to eradicate sexual assault, ensuring a safe and secure society.

The judgment concluded with the dismissal of the criminal appeal, confirming the conviction and sentence passed by the Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive trial of cases under the POCSO Act, Chennai.

This ruling serves as a stern reminder of the judiciary’s commitment to protecting the rights and safety of children, and its intolerance towards crimes against minors.

 

Date of Decision: 04.08.2023

Ramki vs State The Inspector of Police,

Similar News