Benefit Of Acquittal Can Be Extended To Non-Appealing Co-Accused If Prosecution Case Is Found To Be Fundamentally Unreliable: Madras High Court Hindu Marriage Act | Petition For Restitution Of Conjugal Rights Serves As A Valid Defence Against Allegations Of Desertion: Kerala High Court Employee Has No Vested Right To Seek Or Retain Additional Charge; Writ Petition Not Maintainable To Challenge Its Withdrawal: Madhya Pradesh High Court Insurance Act | Insurer Cannot Waive Statutory Deadline For Premium Payment Under Bank Guarantee; No Estoppel Against Statute: NCDRC Absence Of Crime Number In Inquest Report & Discrepancy In Sec 157 CrPC Special Report Renders FIR Doubtful: Allahabad High Court MTP Act  | Termination Of Pregnancy Beyond 24 Weeks Permissible If It Involves Risk To Life Or Grave Injury To Mental Health Of The Victim: Gujarat High Court Section 174A IPC | FIR Cannot Be Quashed If Process Server Reports Indicate Failure To Serve At Ordinary Residence: Delhi High Court Issues Guidelines Insolvency Petition | Transferees Of Debtor Cannot Substitute Debtor To Rebut Allegation Of Intent To Defeat Creditors Under Section 6(b) Provincial Insolvency Act: High Court Medical Negligence | Doctor Cannot Be Held Liable For Choosing One Reasonable Course Of Treatment Over Another: Bombay High Court Cruelty | Non-Registration Of FIR Cannot Be Ground To Discredit Testimony Of Wife Seeking Divorce: Jharkhand High Court No Deception At Inception: Calcutta High Court Refuses To Revive Cheating Charges Against Borrower After One-Time Settlement Consumer Protection Act | Doctrine Of 'Caveat Emptor' Subservient To 'Caveat Venditor'; Auctioneer Liable For Sale Of Encumbered Vehicle: State Commission

Sexual Assault on Minor Children is One of the Most Heinous Crimes”: High Court Upholds Conviction Under POCSO Act

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Judicature at Madras upheld the conviction of a painter, Ramakrishna alias Ramki, for sexually assaulting a 4½-year-old girl. The accused was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment and fined Rs. 5,000/- under Section 6 @ 10 of the POCSO Act, 2012.

Justice R. Hemalatha, in her judgment dated 04.08.2023, emphasized the gravity of the crime, stating, “sexual assault on minor children is one of the most heinous crimes which need very stringent punishment to curb the menace.”

The incident occurred on 19.04.2018, when the accused sexually assaulted the young victim. The appeal was filed contending non-examination of vital witnesses and contradictions in statements. However, the court found the evidence of the victim convincing and criticized the defense counsel for posing inappropriate questions to the young victim.

The court also expressed deep concern over the safety of young girls in society, observing, “In a developing country riddled with taboos and biases, we have seen women emerging out of the shell of ignorance and illiteracy. But, such incidents only make us feel that the future of young girls is unsafe.”

Justice Hemalatha further noted that “Sexual abuse, drugs, and alcohol are the three deep malaises that ruin a society and never allow development of the country.” She called for strict laws and effective implementation to eradicate sexual assault, ensuring a safe and secure society.

The judgment concluded with the dismissal of the criminal appeal, confirming the conviction and sentence passed by the Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive trial of cases under the POCSO Act, Chennai.

This ruling serves as a stern reminder of the judiciary’s commitment to protecting the rights and safety of children, and its intolerance towards crimes against minors.

 

Date of Decision: 04.08.2023

Ramki vs State The Inspector of Police,

Latest Legal News