Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

Sexual Assault on Minor Children is One of the Most Heinous Crimes”: High Court Upholds Conviction Under POCSO Act

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Judicature at Madras upheld the conviction of a painter, Ramakrishna alias Ramki, for sexually assaulting a 4½-year-old girl. The accused was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment and fined Rs. 5,000/- under Section 6 @ 10 of the POCSO Act, 2012.

Justice R. Hemalatha, in her judgment dated 04.08.2023, emphasized the gravity of the crime, stating, “sexual assault on minor children is one of the most heinous crimes which need very stringent punishment to curb the menace.”

The incident occurred on 19.04.2018, when the accused sexually assaulted the young victim. The appeal was filed contending non-examination of vital witnesses and contradictions in statements. However, the court found the evidence of the victim convincing and criticized the defense counsel for posing inappropriate questions to the young victim.

The court also expressed deep concern over the safety of young girls in society, observing, “In a developing country riddled with taboos and biases, we have seen women emerging out of the shell of ignorance and illiteracy. But, such incidents only make us feel that the future of young girls is unsafe.”

Justice Hemalatha further noted that “Sexual abuse, drugs, and alcohol are the three deep malaises that ruin a society and never allow development of the country.” She called for strict laws and effective implementation to eradicate sexual assault, ensuring a safe and secure society.

The judgment concluded with the dismissal of the criminal appeal, confirming the conviction and sentence passed by the Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive trial of cases under the POCSO Act, Chennai.

This ruling serves as a stern reminder of the judiciary’s commitment to protecting the rights and safety of children, and its intolerance towards crimes against minors.

 

Date of Decision: 04.08.2023

Ramki vs State The Inspector of Police,

Latest Legal News