Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Sexual Assault on Minor Children is One of the Most Heinous Crimes”: High Court Upholds Conviction Under POCSO Act

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Judicature at Madras upheld the conviction of a painter, Ramakrishna alias Ramki, for sexually assaulting a 4½-year-old girl. The accused was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment and fined Rs. 5,000/- under Section 6 @ 10 of the POCSO Act, 2012.

Justice R. Hemalatha, in her judgment dated 04.08.2023, emphasized the gravity of the crime, stating, “sexual assault on minor children is one of the most heinous crimes which need very stringent punishment to curb the menace.”

The incident occurred on 19.04.2018, when the accused sexually assaulted the young victim. The appeal was filed contending non-examination of vital witnesses and contradictions in statements. However, the court found the evidence of the victim convincing and criticized the defense counsel for posing inappropriate questions to the young victim.

The court also expressed deep concern over the safety of young girls in society, observing, “In a developing country riddled with taboos and biases, we have seen women emerging out of the shell of ignorance and illiteracy. But, such incidents only make us feel that the future of young girls is unsafe.”

Justice Hemalatha further noted that “Sexual abuse, drugs, and alcohol are the three deep malaises that ruin a society and never allow development of the country.” She called for strict laws and effective implementation to eradicate sexual assault, ensuring a safe and secure society.

The judgment concluded with the dismissal of the criminal appeal, confirming the conviction and sentence passed by the Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive trial of cases under the POCSO Act, Chennai.

This ruling serves as a stern reminder of the judiciary’s commitment to protecting the rights and safety of children, and its intolerance towards crimes against minors.

 

Date of Decision: 04.08.2023

Ramki vs State The Inspector of Police,

Latest Legal News