Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court State Cannot Sleep Over Its Rights: Supreme Court Criticizes Odisha Government for Delayed Appeals in Pension Dispute “Both Hands Intact” Rule is a Relic of the Past: Supreme Court Grants MBBS Admission to Disabled Student Terminal Benefits and Family Pension Alone Do Not Bar Compassionate Appointment, But Financial Distress Must Be Proven – Supreme Court Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC Is Not Limited to Dowry Harassment: Supreme Court Right to Speedy Trial Cannot Be Defeated by Delay Tactics: Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Fast-Tracking of Cheque Bounce Case Framing Charges Under Section 193 IPC Without Following Section 340 CrPC is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Doctrine of Part Performance Under Section 53-A TPA Not Applicable Without Proof of Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Allegations of False Implication Cannot Override Strong Forensic and Documentary Evidence: Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction in Elderly Woman’s Murder and Robbery Case Applicant Not a Sexual Predator, Relationship Was Consensual: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case Fraudulent Transfers to Evade Creditors Cannot Escape Scrutiny: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Execution Petition Gujarat High Court Rules That Contractual Employees Cannot Claim Regularization of Services Serious Charges and Victim’s Suicide Justify Continued Detention: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail in POCSO Case No Permanent Establishment in India, Rejects Notional Income Taxation: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Nokia OY Statutory Bail Under NDPS Act Can Be Denied If FSL Report Reaches Court Before Bail Plea": Calcutta High Court Termination After Acquittal is Unjust: Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Shikshan Sevak, Orders 50% Back Wages Denial of MBBS Seat Due to Administrative Lapses is Unacceptable": Andhra Pradesh High Court Awards ₹7 Lakh Compensation to Wronged Student Sessions Court Cannot Reclassify Non-Bailable Offences While Granting Anticipatory Bail: Allahabad High Court

Sexual Assault on Minor Children is One of the Most Heinous Crimes”: High Court Upholds Conviction Under POCSO Act

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Judicature at Madras upheld the conviction of a painter, Ramakrishna alias Ramki, for sexually assaulting a 4½-year-old girl. The accused was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment and fined Rs. 5,000/- under Section 6 @ 10 of the POCSO Act, 2012.

Justice R. Hemalatha, in her judgment dated 04.08.2023, emphasized the gravity of the crime, stating, “sexual assault on minor children is one of the most heinous crimes which need very stringent punishment to curb the menace.”

The incident occurred on 19.04.2018, when the accused sexually assaulted the young victim. The appeal was filed contending non-examination of vital witnesses and contradictions in statements. However, the court found the evidence of the victim convincing and criticized the defense counsel for posing inappropriate questions to the young victim.

The court also expressed deep concern over the safety of young girls in society, observing, “In a developing country riddled with taboos and biases, we have seen women emerging out of the shell of ignorance and illiteracy. But, such incidents only make us feel that the future of young girls is unsafe.”

Justice Hemalatha further noted that “Sexual abuse, drugs, and alcohol are the three deep malaises that ruin a society and never allow development of the country.” She called for strict laws and effective implementation to eradicate sexual assault, ensuring a safe and secure society.

The judgment concluded with the dismissal of the criminal appeal, confirming the conviction and sentence passed by the Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive trial of cases under the POCSO Act, Chennai.

This ruling serves as a stern reminder of the judiciary’s commitment to protecting the rights and safety of children, and its intolerance towards crimes against minors.

 

Date of Decision: 04.08.2023

Ramki vs State The Inspector of Police,

Similar News