Registration Of FIR Is Mandatory If Information Ex Facie Discloses Commission Of  Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court 'No Res Judicata': Supreme Court Holds Rejection Of Section 156(3) CrPC Plea Is No Bar To Subsequent Registration Of FIR Auto Dealers' Referral Charges From Banks & Insurers Constitute 'Business Auxiliary Service', But No Penalty If Tax Paid Before Show Cause Notice: Supreme Court MACT | Appellate Courts Must Liberally Admit Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC To Compute 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court MACT | Post-Accident Vehicle Position On Sketch Cannot Be Sole Basis To Infer Contributory Negligence: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹50.8 Lakhs 'Sanction Under Section 19(1)(c) PC Act Must Be Granted By Removing Authority': Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction Mere Recovery Of Money Cannot Resurrect Prosecution Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Awards Without Signatures Of All Rival Claimants Are Invalid, Order I Rule 8 CPC Inapplicable: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Cannot Decide Title Disputes, Mere Physical Possession Doesn't Prove Ownership": Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition Awards Power Discoms Can't Escape Liability: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Damages For Death Caused By Snapped Live Wires Lying On Ground Extra-Judicial Confessions To Village Administrative Officers Cannot Be Accepted As Gospel Truth Without Signatures And Corroboration: Madras High Court Acquits Murder Accused 'Article 21 Trumps UAPA Rigors': Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To PFI Members After 5 Years In Jail Due To 'Sluggish' Trial" Daughters Cannot Be Denied Equal Share: Orissa High Court Upholds Compensation Apportionment In Favor Of Daughters Under Hindu Succession Act Cannot Reopen Closed Chapter Years Later: Calcutta High Court Dismisses BSF Ex-Head Constable's Plea Claiming Voluntary Retirement Was Extracted Under Coercion Long-Standing Relationship And Public Recognition Prove Valid Marriage: Karnataka High Court Upholds Second Wife's Right To 1/3rd Share In Property Collector Becomes Functus Officio Once Duty Is Determined: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Penalty On Stamp Duty Deficiency Eyewitness Testimony Contradicted By Medical Evidence Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Woman In IPC 302 Case

Sets Aside Tribunal's Order on Out-of-Turn Promotion: National Games Cannot Be Equated With National Shooting Championship: Delhi High Court

05 September 2024 6:11 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has overruled the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision that had previously allowed an out-of-turn promotion based on sporting achievements. The High Court, in its judgment dated November 6, 2023, firmly stated, "National Games cannot be equated with National Shooting Championship," thereby setting a clear distinction between the two for the purpose of granting out-of-turn promotions within the Delhi Police.

The case centered around SI Azam Khan, who had been granted an out-of-turn promotion by the Tribunal based on his gold medal achievements in the National Shooting Championships. However, upon review, the High Court found that these championships, held under the National Rules, do not align with the criteria specified in the Standing Order No. 4/1989, which requires achievements in events held as per International Shooting Union (ISU) Rules, now known as ISSF Rules, to qualify for promotion.

Justice V. Kameswar Rao and Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta presided over the case and emphasized that the Tribunal had erred in its interpretation. They pointed out that, "any gold medal won in the National Shooting Championship will not fall within the parameters of the Standing Order."

The High Court noted the importance of adhering to the specific provisions of the Standing Order when considering out-of-turn promotions. "Each winning of medal will not entitle him to a promotion," the Court observed, highlighting the necessity for achievements to meet the prescribed standards for such benefits.

The Court's judgment also touched upon the concept of "negative equity," referring to the case of another police officer, ASI Dheerga Pal Singh, who had received a promotion under different circumstances. The Court clarified that one cannot seek out-of-turn promotion solely because it has been granted to another individual under different conditions.

With this judgment, the Delhi High Court has directed a spotlight on the rigorous standards set for out-of-turn promotions within the Delhi Police, ensuring that such elevations are granted strictly in line with established rules and criteria.

Date of Decision: 06 November 2023

GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS. VS AZAM KHAN   

Latest Legal News