Contradictions In Eyewitness Accounts And Suppression Of Crucial Evidence Weaken The Prosecution's Case: Telangana High Court High Court of Sikkim Sets Aside Trial Court’s Decision on Maintainability of Suit: Preliminary Issues Must Be Purely of Law Courts Must Focus on Substance Over Procedure, Says High Court Writ Petitions Against Civil Court Orders Must Be Under Article 227: Patna High Court Reiterates Jurisdictional Boundaries Kerala High Court Upholds Eviction, Rejects Sub-Tenant's Kudikidappu Claim Contractual Employment Does Not Confer Right to Regularization: Jharkhand High Court Divorced Wife Entitled to Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act for Past Domestic Violence: Bombay High Court Tenants Cannot Prescribe How Landlords Utilize Their Property: Delhi High Court Validates Eviction Labour Commissioner to Decide Petitioner’s Date of Birth Claim within Three Months, Ensuring Proper Verification and Consideration of Evidence: Uttarakhand High Court Concealment of Health Condition and False Allegations Amount to Cruelty: Gujarat High Court Upholds Divorce Decree Judicial Proceedings Cannot Be Instituted After Four Years: MP High Court in Quashing FIR Against Retired Engineer Orissa High Court Invalidates Lecturer Recruitment Advertisements for Non-Compliance with UGC Standards Public Interest Jurisdiction Not a Substitute for Private Litigation: Karnataka High Court Declines PIL Cognizance under Section 188 IPC is illegal without a public servant’s complaint:Kerala High Court Juvenile Justice Act Prevails Over Recruitment Rules: Madras High Court Rules Juvenile Records Cannot Bar Employment in Police Services" Calcutta High Court Quashes MR Distributorship Selection Due to Irregularities in Godown Compliance and Selection Process Once the driver has established the validity of his license, the insurer cannot escape liability without conclusive proof to the contrary: J&K HC Belated Claims Cannot Be Entertained: Kerala High Court Overturns CAT Decision on Date of Birth Correction DNA Tests Cannot Supersede Established Legal Presumptions: Himachal Pradesh HC Section 26E of SARFAESI Act Overrides VAT Act: Secured Creditor's Charge Has Priority Over State's Tax Dues: Gujrat High Court High Court of Delhi Clarifies Jurisdiction in Commercial Dispute: 'Procedural Efficiency Must Be Upheld Power Under Section 319 CrPC Cannot Be Exercised Without Prima Facie Case Beyond Contradictions: Supreme Court Motive Alone Insufficient for Conviction Without Corroboration: Supreme Court Supreme Court Ensures Equal Financial Benefits for All High Court Judges: Discrimination Based on Recruitment Source Struck Down Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Four Accused: Cites Contradictory Dying Declarations and Lack of Independent Evidence in Murder Case Evidence Corroborates Violent Robbery and Recovery of Stolen Articles: Calcutta High Court Upholds Conviction in Burrabazar Dacoity Case Failure to Implead Contesting Candidates is Fatal; Fundamental Defect Cannot Be Cured: Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Magistrate Not Functus Officio Post-Final Order in Maintenance Cases: Allahabad High Court Substantial Questions of Law a Must in Second Appeals, Reiterates Andhra Pradesh High Court Inconsistencies and Procedural Lapses: Allahabad High Court Acquits Four in Neeta Singh Murder Case

Serious Infirmity in Adhoc Promotions: Gauhati High Court Sets Aside CAT Order, Directs Fresh Assessment on DPC Procedures

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Gauhati High Court has emphasized the necessity of procedural propriety in administrative decisions, particularly in the context of promotions within government bodies. The Court scrutinized the Central Administrative Tribunal's (CAT) order mandating the holding of regular Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) meetings, underlining the need for adherence to judicial directions and reasoned judgements in administrative matters.

Facts and Issues: The case arose from a writ petition filed by the Union of India against an order of the CAT, which directed the holding of regular DPC meetings as of 20/02/1998, in lieu of adhoc promotions. The respondent, originally appointed as Design Assistant in the Central Water Commission (CWC), was given adhoc promotion but faced pay fixation anomalies. The CAT's initial order was partially set aside by the High Court and remanded for fresh consideration, leading to the current proceedings.

Judicial Scrutiny of Administrative Decisions: The Court analyzed the legality of adhoc promotions in the CWC and their impact on pay and seniority. It highlighted the significance of reviewing administrative decisions under legal standards and the scope of judicial intervention.

Procedural Errors in CAT's Approach: The High Court found procedural errors in CAT's judgement, particularly its failure to provide a comprehensive decision and misinterpretation of the High Court's remanding order. This emphasized the importance of following prescribed procedures and providing reasoned judgements.

Remanding for Fresh Consideration: The Court remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision, stressing the need for a reasoned order in compliance with the High Court's directions and adhering to procedural norms.

Decision: The Gauhati High Court set aside the impugned order of the CAT due to procedural impropriety and remanded the matter for a fresh decision. The Court underscored the significance of proper administrative processes and legal compliance in government promotions, directing the Tribunal to pass a reasoned order within six months.

Date of Decided on : 19-03-2024

THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS VS SHRIHARI SEKHAR THE THAN SUB-DIVISIONAL ENGINEER

Similar News