CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness

Serious Infirmity in Adhoc Promotions: Gauhati High Court Sets Aside CAT Order, Directs Fresh Assessment on DPC Procedures

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Gauhati High Court has emphasized the necessity of procedural propriety in administrative decisions, particularly in the context of promotions within government bodies. The Court scrutinized the Central Administrative Tribunal's (CAT) order mandating the holding of regular Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) meetings, underlining the need for adherence to judicial directions and reasoned judgements in administrative matters.

Facts and Issues: The case arose from a writ petition filed by the Union of India against an order of the CAT, which directed the holding of regular DPC meetings as of 20/02/1998, in lieu of adhoc promotions. The respondent, originally appointed as Design Assistant in the Central Water Commission (CWC), was given adhoc promotion but faced pay fixation anomalies. The CAT's initial order was partially set aside by the High Court and remanded for fresh consideration, leading to the current proceedings.

Judicial Scrutiny of Administrative Decisions: The Court analyzed the legality of adhoc promotions in the CWC and their impact on pay and seniority. It highlighted the significance of reviewing administrative decisions under legal standards and the scope of judicial intervention.

Procedural Errors in CAT's Approach: The High Court found procedural errors in CAT's judgement, particularly its failure to provide a comprehensive decision and misinterpretation of the High Court's remanding order. This emphasized the importance of following prescribed procedures and providing reasoned judgements.

Remanding for Fresh Consideration: The Court remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision, stressing the need for a reasoned order in compliance with the High Court's directions and adhering to procedural norms.

Decision: The Gauhati High Court set aside the impugned order of the CAT due to procedural impropriety and remanded the matter for a fresh decision. The Court underscored the significance of proper administrative processes and legal compliance in government promotions, directing the Tribunal to pass a reasoned order within six months.

Date of Decided on : 19-03-2024

THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS VS SHRIHARI SEKHAR THE THAN SUB-DIVISIONAL ENGINEER

Latest Legal News