Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

Serious Allegations and Non-Cooperation in Investigation: High Court of Delhi Denies Bail to Accused in Sexual Assault Case Involving a Minor

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Delhi today refused to grant anticipatory bail to Khushal Singh @Gangu, the petitioner in the case filed under FIR No. 486/2023. The case involved serious charges under Sections 354/ 354A/ 354D/509 IPC and Sections 8/12 of the POCSO Act.

Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar, presiding over the matter, observed the gravity of the allegations, highlighting the petitioner's non-cooperation with the ongoing investigation. "Keeping in view the circumstances of this case and the fact that the victim was a minor at the time of the incident coupled with serious allegations against the petitioner... no benefit can be given to him at this stage," Justice Bhatnagar stated in his order.

The petition for anticipatory bail arose following allegations that the petitioner made inappropriate gestures towards a minor and physically assaulted her. The petitioner, represented by Senior Advocate Mr. K. K. Manan and his team, argued that he had been falsely implicated, citing CCTV footage and eyewitness accounts to establish his absence from the crime scene.

However, the State, represented by Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP, and Ms. Astha, Advocate for the prosecutrix, vehemently opposed the bail. They pointed out the victim's minor status at the time of the incident and her supported allegations in her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C.

Justice Bhatnagar noted the presence of the victim near the place of the incident in the CCTV footage but acknowledged that the exact place of the offence was not covered by the cameras. This aspect, he mentioned, is a matter of trial and cannot be commented upon at this stage.

The court also took into consideration the petitioner's past criminal record and the fact that he had been absconding since the day of the incident. The issuance of a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) against the petitioner on December 1, 2023, was also a factor in the decision to deny bail.

This judgment underlines the court's stance on crimes involving minors and the importance of cooperation in the judicial process. Justice Bhatnagar concluded his order by stating, "Nothing stated hereinabove shall tantamount to the expression of any opinion on the merits of this case." The case continues to garner attention, emphasizing the judiciary's commitment to safeguarding minors' rights and ensuring justice.

Date of Decision: 19.01.2024

KHUSHAL SINGH @GANGU VS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI         

 

Latest Legal News