Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |    

Section 138 N.I. Act - Scientific Impossibility in Ink Age Testing: No Justification for Futile Attempt to Find Out the Age of the Ink: Bombay High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling on the 2nd of November, 2023, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, presided over by Justice Anil L. Pansare, has restored a trial court’s order that rejected an application for a handwriting expert to perform an ink age test on a disputed cheque Case u/s 138 N.I. Act. The decision reaffirms the stance that scientific methods are not infallible, especially when it comes to determining the age of ink used in documents.

The petitioner, aggrieved by a Sessions Court’s revision that had allowed the respondent’s application, found solace in the High Court’s ruling. The High Court, citing the absence of any concrete scientific test to determine the ink’s age, stated, “This being the position, there is absolutely no justification to have a futile attempt to find out the age of the ink on the instrument under question.”

Justice Pansare’s judgment highlighted the balance between an accused’s right to a fair trial and the practicality of evidence sought. “There cannot be any dispute on the aforesaid proposition of law but then where the exercise is found to be undertaken in futility, the Courts below will have to be vigilant,” he observed.

The High Court referred to several judgments that have previously underscored the lack of a scientific method for ascertaining the age of ink, including a candid explanation from the Assistant Director of the Forensic Science Department, Chennai, confirming this scientific gap.

In his conclusive remarks, Justice Pansare quashed the judgment and order passed by the Sessions Court and reinstated the order of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Yavatmal, thus, bringing an end to a contentious legal debate regarding the admissibility of ink age testing as evidence.

The ruling has sent a clear message to the legal community about the limitations of forensic science in criminal proceedings and the need for judicial prudence in entertaining evidence applications.

Date of Decision: 02.11.2023

Dnyaneshwar Eknath VS Vinod Ramchandra  

Similar News