Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention and Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored” - Punjab & Haryana High Court Emphasizes Bail as the Rule Taxation Law | Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Hotel’s Expenditures on Carpets, Mattresses, and Lampshades are Deductible as Current Expenditures Orissa High Court Upholds Disengagement of Teacher for Unauthorized Absence and Suppression of Facts In Disciplined Forces, Transfers are an Administrative Necessity; Judicial Interference is Limited to Cases of Proven Mala Fide: Patna High Court Act Of Judge, When Free From Oblique Motive, Cannot Be Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Additional Collector Registration Act | False Statements in Conveyance Documents Qualify for Prosecution Under Registration Act: Kerala High Court When Junior is Promoted, Senior’s Case Cannot be Deferred Unjustly: Karnataka High Court in Sealed Cover Promotion Dispute Medical Training Standards Cannot Be Lowered, Even for Disability’ in MBBS Admission Case: Delhi HC Suspicion, However Strong It May Be, Cannot Take Place Of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Acquittal No Detention Order Can Rely on Grounds Already Quashed: High Court Sets Precedent on Preventive Detention Limits Tenant's Claims of Hardship and Landlord's Alternate Accommodations Insufficient to Prevent Eviction: Allahabad HC Further Custodial Detention May Not Be Necessary: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Murder Case Citing Lack of Specific Evidence High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court A Fresh Section 11 Arbitration Petition Without Liberty Granted at the Time of Withdrawal is Not Maintainable: Supreme Court; Principles of Order 23 CPC Applied Adult Sexual Predators Ought Not To Be Dealt With Leniency Or Extended Misplaced Sympathy: Sikkim High Court Retired Employee Entitled to Interest on Delayed Leave Encashment Despite Absence of Statutory Provision: Delhi HC Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Full Disability Pension and Service Element for Life to Army Veteran Taxation Law | Director Must Be Given Notice to Prove Lack of Negligence: Telangana High Court Quashes Order Against Director in Tax Recovery Case High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Acquits Accused, Questions “Capacity of Victim to Make Coherent Statement” with 100% Burn Injuries High Court of Himachal Pradesh Dismisses Bail Plea in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam: Rajdeep Singh Case Execution of Conveyance Ends Arbitration Clause; Appeal for Arbitration Rejected: Bombay High Court

Sanctioned Plan Not in Violation of Building Norms, But Issued in Contravention of Rule 50 – Supreme Court Allows Appellants to Challenge Municipal Enquiry and Show Cause Notice

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court in its recent judgment has provided significant clarifications regarding the enforcement of municipal building regulations, specifically Rule 50 of the West Bengal Municipal (Building) Rules, 2007. The case focused on whether municipal authorities can issue show cause notices for building plan violations when the sanctioned plan itself was approved, albeit in contravention of the said rules.

The appellants, Dr. Ranbeer Bose & Anr., were issued a show cause notice by municipal authorities following a contempt petition that claimed their residential construction did not adhere to the mandatory open space requirements under Rule 50. The High Court of Calcutta upheld the notice, compelling the appellants to seek redress from the Supreme Court. The main issue was whether the High Court was justified in using its writ jurisdiction to address what was fundamentally a private dispute between neighbors over building compliance.

Justice Mehta questioned the appropriateness of the High Court’s decision to entertain a writ petition arising from a private dispute, suggesting that such matters should ideally be resolved via municipal or civil courts.

The Court found that the building was constructed as per the sanctioned plan, which did not violate the building norms per se but noted that the plan was sanctioned in violation of Rule 50.

The Court underscored the appellants’ right to challenge both the municipal enquiry report and the subsequent show cause notice under the provisions of the West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993.

It was emphasized that the appellants’ objections should be considered objectively and without prejudice arising from either the contempt proceedings or the initial writ proceedings.

The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs. The appellants were granted the liberty to challenge the municipal enquiry report and the show cause notice. Furthermore, should their objections be dismissed by the Board of Councillors, they retained the right to appeal in a competent court.

Date of Decision: May 3, 2024

Dr. Ranbeer Bose & Anr. Vs. Anita Das & Anr.

Similar News