Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Right to Repair-Mandatory for Manufacturers to offer repair services for smartphones, consumer durables and automobile products

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The government will mandate that manufacturers of automobiles, cell phones, and other consumer goods share product information so that consumers can perform repairs themselves or hire third parties.

In a statement released on Thursday, the Department of Consumer Affairs announced the formation of a committee chaired by Nidhi Khare, an additional secretary, to develop a framework for "Right to Repair." Wednesday was the first time the committee met to identify sectors for the right.

The sectors identified include farming equipment, mobile phones/ tablets, consumer durables, and automobiles/automobile equipment. According to the concept of 'Right to Repair,' customers must possess a product in its entirety after purchase. "...consumers should be able to easily and affordably repair and modify their products without being subject to the whims of manufacturers," according to the statement.

The framework aims to empower consumers, standardise trade between original equipment manufacturers and third-party buyers and sellers, and reduce e-waste, according to the statement.

The rationale behind the 'Right to Repair' is that when customers purchase a product, it is inherent that they must own it in its entirety. Therefore, consumers should be able to repair and modify the product without being subject to the whims of manufacturers.

Nevertheless, manufacturers typically retain proprietary control over spare parts, including their design, and the government believes that this type of monopoly on repair processes violates the "right to choose" of the customer.

"Manufactures promote a culture of "planned obsolescence." This is a system in which the design of any device is such that it only lasts for a certain amount of time, after which it must be replaced. When contracts fail to transfer complete control to the buyer, the legal rights of the seller are compromised "The committee stated in its initial meeting.

LocalCircles, a community network, discovered in a previous survey that 43% of Indian households have three or more devices or gadgets that are less than five years old and require service or repair.

The right to repair has been recognised in many nations around the world, including the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union.

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission has instructed manufacturers to end unfair anticompetitive practises and to ensure that consumers can perform repairs themselves or through a third party.

Latest Legal News