Law Does Not Countenance Resurrection Of Stale Claims Through Inventive Drafting: Karnataka High Court Rejects 20-Year-Old Partition Dispute CPC Provisions Cannot Be Used to Transfer Consumer Complaints Across States: NCDRC Invokes Section 62 to End Forum-Shifting Ordeal in Nirmal Spinning Mills Case FSSA Provisions Prevail Over PFA Act In Cases Of Overlapping Jurisdiction, Prosecution Under Old Act Impermissible: J&K High Court Motive Pales Into Significance When Direct Ocular Evidence Establishes Crime; Enmity Is A Double-Edged Sword: Allahabad High Court Plaintiff Cannot Succeed Merely On Weakness Of Defence; Initial Burden To Prove Claim Rests On Claimant: Madras High Court Witness Threats Noted By Higher Courts Disentitle Convict To Suspension Of Sentence: Gujarat High Court Family Court Orders Must Be Enforced Immediately, Pendency Of Applications No Excuse For Disobedience: Delhi High Court 'Fraud And Justice Never Dwell Together': Karnataka High Court Reverses Order To Grant Land Based On Fabricated Records Development Authority Competent To Sanction Land Use Conversion From Residential To Nursing Home If Permitted Under Master Plan & Zoning Regulations: Allahabad High Court Notification Changing Import Policy From 'Free' To 'Restricted' Operative Only From Exact Time Of Publication In E-Gazette: Delhi High Court On Name Of Protection of the Complainer Excluding Relevant Defence Evidence in Sexual Offences Trials May Breach Fair Trial Rights: UK Supreme Court Boundaries In Sale Deed Prevail Over Discrepancy In Property Description; Adverse Possession Begins From Date Of Hostile Notice: Punjab & Haryana HC Supreme Court of UK Upholds HMRC Decision: Professional Fees Incurred by Investment Holding Company Are Capital Expenditure Criminal Law Cannot Be Used To Silence Citizens Questioning Legality Of Police Action: Madras High Court Quashes Obstruction Case Punjab & Haryana High Court Directs Centre To Treat Ashok Khemka As Empaneled For Future Assignments, Says Denying Relaxation Granted To Peers Is Discriminatory Section 34 Court Cannot Substitute Arbitrator’s Plausible View With Its Own; Not Bound By Technical Rules Of Evidence Act: Madras High Court Article 227 Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Reopen Decrees Finalized Four Decades Ago: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Challenge To 1985 Order Daughter Has No Right To Inherit Agricultural Land If Succession Opened Before 2005 HSA Amendment: Delhi High Court Rejects Plaint Indian Trust Act Inapplicable To Public Religious Endowments; Sale Of Charity Property Without HR&CE Commissioner's Permission Void: Madras High Court Supreme Court Clarifies Status of Collateral Warranties Under Construction Contracts FIR Quashed Against Newsclick: PMLA Proceedings Cannot Stand Alone Without A Predicate Offence, Rules Delhi High Court Assessee Claiming TDS Exemption On "Reimbursement" To Non-Residents Must Obtain Mandatory Tax Determination Under Section 195(2): Madras High Court

Refuses To Interfere With Lab Assistant Exam Schedule-Court Can't Dictate Exam Dates: RJ HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The bench of vacation of the Rajasthan High Court determined that the High Court Can't Dictate Exam Dates and time of a particular examination.

In essence, the petitioners argued that the date of the examination for the recruitment to the post of Lab Assistant, which will be held on 28.06.2002 and 29.06.2022, conflicts with the dates of other examinations. In addition, the petition requested that candidates be given sufficient time to prepare for the examination because, according to the petitioner, the syllabus for the Lab Assistant examination has been revised and a lengthy syllabus containing numerous new topics has been added in place of the previously brief syllabus.

The court noted that all recruitment examinations and graduation examinations are not administered to a single individual or a specific group. These are the examinations for which the relevant department prepares a schedule in advance and which are administered after months of preparation, the court added.

Justice Rekha Borana, in ruling on the petition, remarked:

"This court does not believe that the allotted time is insufficient for any student to prepare for the exam. Moreover, said revised syllabus was challenged in the present writ petition, which was filed on 14.06.2022, a week before the scheduled examination date. Therefore, the present writ petition cannot be considered valid on this basis at this late date."

Regarding the issue of conducting other examinations on the same date and clashing examination dates, the court opined that such interference cannot be made with the respective departments' and authorities' examination timetables and schedules.

The court noted that the petitioners may submit a formal statement to the relevant authorities detailing their grievances. The court added that the relevant authorities may consider the matter in light of the students' best interests.

Jaswant Singh & Ors.  versus.  Staff Selection Board, Jaipur & Ors.

 

Latest Legal News