Renewal Is Not Extension Unless Terms Are Fixed in Same Deed: Bombay High Court Strikes Down ₹64.75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand on Nine-Year Lease Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts—Appointment Void Ab Initio Even After 27 Years: Allahabad High Court Litigants Cannot Be Penalised For Attending Criminal Proceedings Listed On Same Day: Delhi High Court Restores Civil Suit Dismissed For Default Limited Permissive Use Confers No Right to Expand Trademark Beyond Agreed Territories: Bombay High Court Enforces Consent Decree in ‘New Indian Express’ Trademark Dispute Assam Rifles Not Entitled to Parity with Indian Army Merely Due to Similar Duties: Delhi High Court Dismisses Equal Pay Petition Conspiracy Cannot Be Presumed from Illicit Relationship: Bombay High Court Acquits Wife, Affirms Conviction of Paramour in Murder Case Bail in NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases Cannot Be Granted Without Satisfying Twin Conditions of Section 37: Delhi High Court Cancels Bail Orders Terming Them ‘Perversely Illegal’ Article 21 Rights Not Absolute In Cases Threatening National Security: Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted In Jnaneshwari Express Derailment Case A Computer Programme That Solves a Technical Problem Is Not Barred Under Section 3(k): Madras High Court Allows Patent for Software-Based Data Lineage System Premature Auction Without 30-Day Redemption Violates Section 176 and Bank’s Own Terms: Orissa High Court Quashes Canara Bank’s Gold Loan Sale Courts Can’t Stall Climate-Resilient Public Projects: Madras High Court Lifts Status Quo on Eco Park, Pond Works at Race Club Land No Cross-Examination, No Conviction: Gujarat High Court Quashes Customs Penalty for Violating Principles of Natural Justice ITAT Was Wrong in Disregarding Statements Under Oath, But Additions Unsustainable Without Corroborative Evidence: Madras High Court Deduction Theory Under Old Land Acquisition Law Has No Place Under 2013 Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Enhances Compensation for Metro Land Acquisition UIT Cannot Turn Around After Issuing Pattas, It's Estopped Now: Rajasthan High Court Private Doctor’s Widow Eligible for COVID Insurance if Duty Proven: Supreme Court Rebukes Narrow Interpretation of COVID-Era Orders Smaller Benches Cannot Override Constitution Bench Authority Under The Guise Of Clarification: Supreme Court Criticises Judicial Indiscipline Public Premises Act, 1971 | PP Act Overrides State Rent Control Laws for All Tenancies; Suhas Pophale Overruled: Supreme Court Court Has No Power To Reduce Sentence Below Statutory Minimum Under NDPS Act: Supreme Court Denies Relief To Young Mother Convicted With 23.5 kg Ganja Non-Compliance With Section 52-A Is Not Per Se Fatal: Supreme Court Clarifies Law On Sampling Procedure Under NDPS Act MBA Degree Doesn’t Feed the Stomach: Delhi High Court Says Wife’s Qualification No Ground to Deny Maintenance

Refuses To Interfere With Lab Assistant Exam Schedule-Court Can't Dictate Exam Dates: RJ HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The bench of vacation of the Rajasthan High Court determined that the High Court Can't Dictate Exam Dates and time of a particular examination.

In essence, the petitioners argued that the date of the examination for the recruitment to the post of Lab Assistant, which will be held on 28.06.2002 and 29.06.2022, conflicts with the dates of other examinations. In addition, the petition requested that candidates be given sufficient time to prepare for the examination because, according to the petitioner, the syllabus for the Lab Assistant examination has been revised and a lengthy syllabus containing numerous new topics has been added in place of the previously brief syllabus.

The court noted that all recruitment examinations and graduation examinations are not administered to a single individual or a specific group. These are the examinations for which the relevant department prepares a schedule in advance and which are administered after months of preparation, the court added.

Justice Rekha Borana, in ruling on the petition, remarked:

"This court does not believe that the allotted time is insufficient for any student to prepare for the exam. Moreover, said revised syllabus was challenged in the present writ petition, which was filed on 14.06.2022, a week before the scheduled examination date. Therefore, the present writ petition cannot be considered valid on this basis at this late date."

Regarding the issue of conducting other examinations on the same date and clashing examination dates, the court opined that such interference cannot be made with the respective departments' and authorities' examination timetables and schedules.

The court noted that the petitioners may submit a formal statement to the relevant authorities detailing their grievances. The court added that the relevant authorities may consider the matter in light of the students' best interests.

Jaswant Singh & Ors.  versus.  Staff Selection Board, Jaipur & Ors.

 

Latest Legal News