SARFAESI Act | Sale Certificate Cannot Be Issued In Favour Of A Third-Party Nominee Who Was Not The Auction Bidder: Supreme Court SARFAESI Act | Auction Sale Conducted In Violation Of Mandatory Rules And Subsisting Restraint Order Is Vitiated In Law: Supreme Court Recovery Of Alleged Overpayment From A Separate, Unrelated Contract Without Notice Violates Principles Of Natural Justice: Supreme Court IBC | Adjudicating Authority Has Power To Recall CIRP Admission Order If It Was Obtained Through Fraud Or Collusion: Supreme Court Section 138 NI Act | Presumption Of Service Is Attracted Once Notice Is Dispatched To Correct Address Of Drawer: Supreme Court Operation Of Hookah Bars In Restaurants Constitutes Violation Of Rule 4(3) Of COTPA Rules: Allahabad High Court High Court Cannot Recall Order Passed On Merits Even If Passed Ex-Parte: Bombay High Court Administrative Authorities Cannot Pass Orders Having Civil Consequences Without Meaningful Consideration Of The Affected Employee’s Response: Allahabad High Court Discharge Application Cannot Be Converted Into A 'Mini-Trial' To Assess Evidentiary Sufficiency: Andhra Pradesh High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Allegations Are Falsified By Documents Annexed To Plaint Or Based On Non-Existent Law: Bombay High Court Police Cannot Interfere In Pending Civil Disputes Or Act As Arbitrators In Private Property Conflicts: Andhra Pradesh High Court Contract For Personal Services Between Doctor And Hospital Is Determinable And Not Specifically Enforceable: Calcutta High Court Allegations Of Sexual Offences Cannot Be Quashed Based On Contradictory Evidence Requiring Mini-Trial: Delhi High Court PMLA Adjudication | Failure To Expressly Discuss Every Submission In Written Synopsis Does Not Vitiate Order Under Principles Of Natural Justice: Karnataka High Court Prolonged Separation Of Sixteen Years Constitutes Cruelty Under Special Marriage Act: Kerala High Court Grants Divorce Order XII Rule 6 CPC | Decree Of Possession Can Be Granted On Admissions Even If Relationship Of Landlord-Tenant Is Disputed: Delhi High Court Non-Framing Of Issues Under Order XIV CPC Does Not Vitiate Trial Unless Prejudice Is Proved: Madras High Court Order 47 Rule 1 CPC | Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Cure Failure To Produce Evidence That Was Within Knowledge Of Applicant: Madhya Pradesh High Court Codicil To A Will Must Be Proved Like A Will; Propounder Must Remove All Suspicious Circumstances: Punjab & Haryana High Court Mere Lodging Of Section 498-A IPC Case Not Cruelty: Telangana High Court Sets Aside Divorce Decree Order XVII Rule 3 CPC | Power To Dismiss Suit For Default Of Evidence Is Drastic And Must Be Exercised Sparingly: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Refuses To Interfere With Lab Assistant Exam Schedule-Court Can't Dictate Exam Dates: RJ HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin

The bench of vacation of the Rajasthan High Court determined that the High Court Can't Dictate Exam Dates and time of a particular examination.

In essence, the petitioners argued that the date of the examination for the recruitment to the post of Lab Assistant, which will be held on 28.06.2002 and 29.06.2022, conflicts with the dates of other examinations. In addition, the petition requested that candidates be given sufficient time to prepare for the examination because, according to the petitioner, the syllabus for the Lab Assistant examination has been revised and a lengthy syllabus containing numerous new topics has been added in place of the previously brief syllabus.

The court noted that all recruitment examinations and graduation examinations are not administered to a single individual or a specific group. These are the examinations for which the relevant department prepares a schedule in advance and which are administered after months of preparation, the court added.

Justice Rekha Borana, in ruling on the petition, remarked:

"This court does not believe that the allotted time is insufficient for any student to prepare for the exam. Moreover, said revised syllabus was challenged in the present writ petition, which was filed on 14.06.2022, a week before the scheduled examination date. Therefore, the present writ petition cannot be considered valid on this basis at this late date."

Regarding the issue of conducting other examinations on the same date and clashing examination dates, the court opined that such interference cannot be made with the respective departments' and authorities' examination timetables and schedules.

The court noted that the petitioners may submit a formal statement to the relevant authorities detailing their grievances. The court added that the relevant authorities may consider the matter in light of the students' best interests.

Jaswant Singh & Ors.  versus.  Staff Selection Board, Jaipur & Ors.

 

Latest Legal News

  • by sayum
    01 October 2026 8:21 AM
Order XVII Rule 3 CPC | Power To Dismiss Suit For Default Of Evidence Is Drastic And Must Be Exercised Sparingly: Punjab & Haryana High Court
  • by sayum
    01 October 2026 8:21 AM
Mere Lodging Of Section 498-A IPC Case Not Cruelty: Telangana High Court Sets Aside Divorce Decree
  • by sayum
    01 October 2026 8:21 AM
Codicil To A Will Must Be Proved Like A Will; Propounder Must Remove All Suspicious Circumstances: Punjab & Haryana High Court
  • by sayum
    01 October 2026 8:21 AM
Order 47 Rule 1 CPC | Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Cure Failure To Produce Evidence That Was Within Knowledge Of Applicant: Madhya Pradesh High Court
  • by sayum
    01 October 2026 8:21 AM
Non-Framing Of Issues Under Order XIV CPC Does Not Vitiate Trial Unless Prejudice Is Proved: Madras High Court
  • by sayum
    01 October 2026 8:20 AM
Order XII Rule 6 CPC | Decree Of Possession Can Be Granted On Admissions Even If Relationship Of Landlord-Tenant Is Disputed: Delhi High Court