At the Stage of Framing Charge, Presumption Suffices; Suicide Note and Grave Suspicion Enough: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Charge Under Section 306 IPC 173 CrPC | Framing of Charge Marks End of Investigation—Complainant Cannot Reopen Probe Merely by Citing Police Lapses: Bombay High Court Recovery Alone Cannot Prove Guilt: Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Photos, Videos Must Go: Supreme Court Binds Warring Spouses to Clean Up Social Media in Matrimonial Settlement Standard for Bail Under Section 319 CrPC Is Higher Than Framing of Charge, But Short of Conviction: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused Summoned Mid-Trial State Cannot Arbitrarily Deny Subsidies to 'New Industrial Units' by Retrospectively Applying Expansion Caps: Supreme Court Companies Act | Offence Under Section 448 Is Covered Under Section 447: Supreme Court Bars Private Complaint Without SFIO Nod “See-To-It” Obligation Is Not A Guarantee Under Indian Law: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope Of Section 126 ICA In IBC Disputes Mere Employment of Litigant’s Relatives in Police or Court Doesn't Prove Judicial Bias: Supreme Court Sets Aside Transfer of Criminal Case Reserved Candidate Availing Relaxed Standards in Prelims Cannot Migrate to General Quota for Cadre Allocation: Supreme Court Mere Vesting Does Not Mean Possession: Supreme Court Rules ULC Proceedings Abated For Failure To Serve Mandatory Notice To Actual Occupants Contempt of Courts Act | Natural Justice in Administrative Action: Supreme Court Directs West Bengal Govt to Re-Adjudicate Teachers' Arrears Claims Live-In Relationship with Married Man Not a ‘Relationship in the Nature of Marriage’ Under Domestic Violence Act: Bombay High Court Applies Supreme Court Guidelines Income Tax Act | Substitution of Shares held as Stock-in-Trade upon Amalgamation constitutes Taxable Business Income if Commercially Realisable: Supreme Court Judges Cannot Enact Their Own Protocols During Bail Hearings: Supreme Court Sets Aside Sweeping Age Determination Directions In POCSO If There Is Knowledge That Injury Is Likely To Cause Death, But No Intention Falls Under Section 304 Part II:  Supreme Court High Court Ignored POCSO’s Statutory Rigour, Committed Grave Error in Granting Bail: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Gang-Rape Accused Section 22 HSA | Co-Heirs Have Statutory Right of Pre-Emption Even in Urban Property: Punjab & Haryana High Court 138 NI Act | Issuance of Separate Cheques Gives Rise to Independent Causes of Action, Even if Drawn for Same Underlying Transaction: Supreme Court

Quashes Charges Against Public Servant for Lack of Sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. : Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, quashed the charges framed against a public servant, citing the lack of necessary sanction under Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr.P.C.). The court’s decision highlights crucial aspects of legal procedure in cases involving public servants and sets a significant precedent.

The case, which drew considerable attention, involved allegations of criminal conspiracy and offenses under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The petitioner, a DANICS officer, was charged with offenses including cheating and forgery. However, the crux of the court’s judgment was the absence of prosecution sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C.

In his decisive judgment, Justice Gedela observed, “It is clear that a strong suspicion would be sufficient to maintain an order on charge, however, the said strong suspicion must be founded on some material, which must be such as can be translated into evidence at the stage of trial.” The judgment underscores the necessity of following due legal procedures, particularly in the prosecution of public servants.

The court meticulously evaluated t”e facts and circumstances of the case, emphasizing the importance of sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. for prosecuting public servants. “The allegations against the petitioner are of offences in the discharge of his official duties and as such, the rigors of N.K. Ganguly (supra) shall apply on all fours,” Justice Gedela remarked.

Date of Decision: 22 November 2023

RAKESH BHATNAGAR VS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION      

Latest Legal News