MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Quashes Charges Against Public Servant for Lack of Sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. : Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, quashed the charges framed against a public servant, citing the lack of necessary sanction under Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr.P.C.). The court’s decision highlights crucial aspects of legal procedure in cases involving public servants and sets a significant precedent.

The case, which drew considerable attention, involved allegations of criminal conspiracy and offenses under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The petitioner, a DANICS officer, was charged with offenses including cheating and forgery. However, the crux of the court’s judgment was the absence of prosecution sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C.

In his decisive judgment, Justice Gedela observed, “It is clear that a strong suspicion would be sufficient to maintain an order on charge, however, the said strong suspicion must be founded on some material, which must be such as can be translated into evidence at the stage of trial.” The judgment underscores the necessity of following due legal procedures, particularly in the prosecution of public servants.

The court meticulously evaluated t”e facts and circumstances of the case, emphasizing the importance of sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. for prosecuting public servants. “The allegations against the petitioner are of offences in the discharge of his official duties and as such, the rigors of N.K. Ganguly (supra) shall apply on all fours,” Justice Gedela remarked.

Date of Decision: 22 November 2023

RAKESH BHATNAGAR VS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION      

Latest Legal News