Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Quashes Charges Against Public Servant for Lack of Sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. : Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, quashed the charges framed against a public servant, citing the lack of necessary sanction under Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr.P.C.). The court’s decision highlights crucial aspects of legal procedure in cases involving public servants and sets a significant precedent.

The case, which drew considerable attention, involved allegations of criminal conspiracy and offenses under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The petitioner, a DANICS officer, was charged with offenses including cheating and forgery. However, the crux of the court’s judgment was the absence of prosecution sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C.

In his decisive judgment, Justice Gedela observed, “It is clear that a strong suspicion would be sufficient to maintain an order on charge, however, the said strong suspicion must be founded on some material, which must be such as can be translated into evidence at the stage of trial.” The judgment underscores the necessity of following due legal procedures, particularly in the prosecution of public servants.

The court meticulously evaluated t”e facts and circumstances of the case, emphasizing the importance of sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. for prosecuting public servants. “The allegations against the petitioner are of offences in the discharge of his official duties and as such, the rigors of N.K. Ganguly (supra) shall apply on all fours,” Justice Gedela remarked.

Date of Decision: 22 November 2023

RAKESH BHATNAGAR VS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION      

Latest Legal News