MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Punjab-Haryana High Court Grants Bail  "Merely Because Allegations Are Serious, Bail Cannot Be Denied"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab-Haryana High Court has set aside the order of the Special Judge, Amritsar, and granted regular bail to Gursewak Singh, who has been in custody since July 5, 2020. The bench, comprising Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri, Acting Chief Justice, and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra, delivered their decision on November 9, 2023, making a pivotal statement, "Merely because allegations are serious, bail cannot be denied."

Gursewak Singh had appealed against the dismissal of his regular bail application in a case involving charges under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, Arms Act, and Prisons Act. The court highlighted concerns regarding the prosecution under the UAP Act due to the absence of pre-requisite sanction from the competent authority at the time of the presentation of the challan.

The Court observed that there was a lack of specific evidence attributing any role to Singh in the commission of the offences for which he had been booked. "No specific and active role is shown to have been attributed to the present appellant qua commission of offences punishable under the provisions of IPC and Arms Act," the bench noted.

In their judgment, the bench underscored the lengthy duration of Singh's custody and the slow pace of the trial as key considerations for granting bail. They remarked, "Considering the appellant's lengthy custody (about three and a half years) and the slow pace of the trial, the court allowed the appeal."

Advocates Mr. Rajiv Malhotra represented the appellant, while Mr. Alankar Narula, AAG, Punjab, appeared for the respondent.

The decision has been welcomed by legal experts as a reinforcement of the principle that the seriousness of allegations alone cannot be a ground for denial of bail, emphasizing the importance of individual liberty and the right to a fair trial. The Court also clarified that their observations were solely for the purpose of granting bail and should not influence the merits of the ongoing trial.

Date of Decision: 09.11.2023

Gursewak Singh VS State of Punjab                                             

Latest Legal News