Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Punjab and Haryana High Court: Valid Driving License Exonerates Vehicle Owner from Liability for Compensation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, the court held that a valid driving license absolves the owner of a vehicle from liability for compensation in a motor vehicle accident case. The court modified the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and granted relief to the vehicle owner.

The judgment was delivered by Mr. Harpreet Singh Brar, J., on May 12, 2023, in the case of Jaspal Singh versus National Insurance Company Limited and others. The court observed that if a driving license is found to be validly issued, the recovery rights of the insurance company cannot be granted.

The case pertained to an accident that occurred on April 10, 2012, involving two trucks. The claimant, Raj Kumar, had filed a claim for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking redress for injuries sustained in the accident. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal partly accepted the claim and granted recovery rights to the insurance company to recover the compensation amount from the owner and driver of the offending vehicle.

The vehicle owner, Jaspal Singh, filed an appeal challenging the Tribunal's award. The appellant contended that the insurance company had failed to establish a breach of policy by the insured. The key issue in the case was the validity of the driver's license of Gurmukh Singh, the driver of the offending vehicle.

During the hearing, the insurance company accepted the validity of the driving license, and a verification report confirmed its authenticity. The court, referring to various judgments, held that the burden to prove the license's invalidity rested on the insurance company. As the license was found to be validly issued, the recovery rights of the insurance company were dismissed.

Mr. Harpreet Singh Brar, J., observed, "Once the driving licence issued by the concerned RTO of Nagaland was found to be genuine... the owner of the offending vehicle cannot be held liable to pay compensation to the victim." The court further emphasized that the appellant had taken reasonable care in hiring the driver, who possessed a valid license.

Consequently, the court allowed the appeal and modified the award. The compensation amount of Rs. 5,95,000/- along with interest at the rate of 7.5% p.a. was directed to be paid by the insurance company. The insurance company was also directed to reimburse any amount already paid by the appellant. The court ordered the insurance company to pay the compensation within two months from the date of the order, along with the specified interest.

Date of Decision: 12.05.2023

 Jaspal Singh VS National Insurance Company Limited and ors.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Jaspal-Vs-National-Insurance-12-May-23-PH-HC1.pdf"]

Latest Legal News