Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Litigation Policy is Not Law, Can’t Enforce Guidelines Through Courts: Rajasthan High Court Refuses to Entertain Quo Warranto Against Additional Advocate General’s Appointment Police and Lawyers Are Two Limbs of Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Police Misconduct Incident Sole Testimony, Forensic Gaps, and Withheld Witness: No Conviction Possible: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Murder Trial Remand Keeps the Dispute Alive – Not Arrears: Bombay High Court Holds SVLDRS Relief Must Be Computed Under Litigation Category Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case

Punjab and Haryana High Court: Valid Driving License Exonerates Vehicle Owner from Liability for Compensation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, the court held that a valid driving license absolves the owner of a vehicle from liability for compensation in a motor vehicle accident case. The court modified the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and granted relief to the vehicle owner.

The judgment was delivered by Mr. Harpreet Singh Brar, J., on May 12, 2023, in the case of Jaspal Singh versus National Insurance Company Limited and others. The court observed that if a driving license is found to be validly issued, the recovery rights of the insurance company cannot be granted.

The case pertained to an accident that occurred on April 10, 2012, involving two trucks. The claimant, Raj Kumar, had filed a claim for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking redress for injuries sustained in the accident. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal partly accepted the claim and granted recovery rights to the insurance company to recover the compensation amount from the owner and driver of the offending vehicle.

The vehicle owner, Jaspal Singh, filed an appeal challenging the Tribunal's award. The appellant contended that the insurance company had failed to establish a breach of policy by the insured. The key issue in the case was the validity of the driver's license of Gurmukh Singh, the driver of the offending vehicle.

During the hearing, the insurance company accepted the validity of the driving license, and a verification report confirmed its authenticity. The court, referring to various judgments, held that the burden to prove the license's invalidity rested on the insurance company. As the license was found to be validly issued, the recovery rights of the insurance company were dismissed.

Mr. Harpreet Singh Brar, J., observed, "Once the driving licence issued by the concerned RTO of Nagaland was found to be genuine... the owner of the offending vehicle cannot be held liable to pay compensation to the victim." The court further emphasized that the appellant had taken reasonable care in hiring the driver, who possessed a valid license.

Consequently, the court allowed the appeal and modified the award. The compensation amount of Rs. 5,95,000/- along with interest at the rate of 7.5% p.a. was directed to be paid by the insurance company. The insurance company was also directed to reimburse any amount already paid by the appellant. The court ordered the insurance company to pay the compensation within two months from the date of the order, along with the specified interest.

Date of Decision: 12.05.2023

 Jaspal Singh VS National Insurance Company Limited and ors.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Jaspal-Vs-National-Insurance-12-May-23-PH-HC1.pdf"]

Latest Legal News