Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court: Valid Driving License Exonerates Vehicle Owner from Liability for Compensation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, the court held that a valid driving license absolves the owner of a vehicle from liability for compensation in a motor vehicle accident case. The court modified the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and granted relief to the vehicle owner.

The judgment was delivered by Mr. Harpreet Singh Brar, J., on May 12, 2023, in the case of Jaspal Singh versus National Insurance Company Limited and others. The court observed that if a driving license is found to be validly issued, the recovery rights of the insurance company cannot be granted.

The case pertained to an accident that occurred on April 10, 2012, involving two trucks. The claimant, Raj Kumar, had filed a claim for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking redress for injuries sustained in the accident. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal partly accepted the claim and granted recovery rights to the insurance company to recover the compensation amount from the owner and driver of the offending vehicle.

The vehicle owner, Jaspal Singh, filed an appeal challenging the Tribunal's award. The appellant contended that the insurance company had failed to establish a breach of policy by the insured. The key issue in the case was the validity of the driver's license of Gurmukh Singh, the driver of the offending vehicle.

During the hearing, the insurance company accepted the validity of the driving license, and a verification report confirmed its authenticity. The court, referring to various judgments, held that the burden to prove the license's invalidity rested on the insurance company. As the license was found to be validly issued, the recovery rights of the insurance company were dismissed.

Mr. Harpreet Singh Brar, J., observed, "Once the driving licence issued by the concerned RTO of Nagaland was found to be genuine... the owner of the offending vehicle cannot be held liable to pay compensation to the victim." The court further emphasized that the appellant had taken reasonable care in hiring the driver, who possessed a valid license.

Consequently, the court allowed the appeal and modified the award. The compensation amount of Rs. 5,95,000/- along with interest at the rate of 7.5% p.a. was directed to be paid by the insurance company. The insurance company was also directed to reimburse any amount already paid by the appellant. The court ordered the insurance company to pay the compensation within two months from the date of the order, along with the specified interest.

Date of Decision: 12.05.2023

 Jaspal Singh VS National Insurance Company Limited and ors.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Jaspal-Vs-National-Insurance-12-May-23-PH-HC1.pdf"]

Latest Legal News