Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

“Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Rights of Long-Term Part-Time Employees, Directs Regularization and Compassionate Assistance

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 7 July 2023, In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has delivered a judgment affirming the eligibility of long-term part-time employees for regularization of their services and the entitlement to compassionate assistance. The judgment, delivered by Justice Raj Mohan Singh, emphasized that the availability of sanctioned posts should not be a valid ground to deny regularization when employees have diligently served for a substantial period.

Justice Raj Mohan Singh stated in the judgment, “Long-term part-time employees should be eligible for regularization of their services. The continuous nature of their work demonstrates the need for their regular presence, and it is unjust to deny them regularization based on the availability of sanctioned posts.” This decision aligns with previous court orders and government policies supporting the regularization of long-term part-time employees.

The case, Bimla and others v. State of Haryana and others, involved the petitioners seeking the issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to release service benefits, family pension, and financial assistance. The court recognized the entitlement of the deceased employee’s family to compassionate assistance, considering the deceased employee as a regular employee at the time of his death.

Justice Raj Mohan Singh further remarked, “The claim for compassionate assistance should be considered by the competent authority in accordance with the relevant laws and policies. The deceased employee’s family deserves the support provided under the Haryana Compassionate Assistance to the Dependent of the Deceased Employee Rules 2006.”

This ruling has far-reaching implications, as it sets a precedent for the regularization and compassionate assistance for long-term part-time employees in the state. The judgment aligns with the principles of fairness and upholds the rights of employees who have dedicated their services to an establishment for an extended period.

The court’s decision in Bimla and others v. State of Haryana and others underscores the need for employers to recognize and acknowledge the contributions of long-term part-time employees. The ruling also highlights the importance of implementing policies that promote job security and address the concerns of such employees.

With this judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has taken a significant step towards ensuring equal treatment and justice for long-term part-time employees, enabling them to avail themselves of regularization and compassionate assistance in a fair and equitable manner.

Date of Decision: 07.07.2023

Bimla and others vs State of Haryana and others

Latest Legal News