Second 482 Petition Maintainable On Changed Circumstances: Allahabad HC Quashes Proceedings Against Aptech VP In Jal Nigam Recruitment Case Police Have No Jurisdiction To Adjudicate Civil Disputes Between Parties, Must Adhere To Statutory Limits: Andhra Pradesh High Court Consent Decree Based On Compromise Signed By Constituted Attorney And Counsel Is Binding Even After 30 Years: Bombay High Court Changing Service Conditions Mid-Bond For Senior Residents Doctors Is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Quashes Retroactive Application Of New SOP Succession Certificate Under Indian Succession Act Cannot Determine Entitlement To Family Pension And Retiral Benefits: Allahabad High Court Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected For Failure To Value Reliefs Separately And Pay Ad-Valorem Court Fees: Delhi High Court NDPS Act | Non-Compliance With Mandatory Provisions Of Sections 42, 50 And 57 Vitiates Search And Seizure, Warrants Acquittal: Gujarat High Court FIR Cannot Be Quashed Merely On Complainant’s Consent; Court Must Independently Scrutinize If Ingredients Of Offence Are Made Out: Calcutta High Court Section 25 Hindu Marriage Act | Permanent Alimony Must Be Based On Husband’s Financial Capacity And Wife’s Reasonable Comfort: Jharkhand High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Direct Registration Of FIR Or Constitute SIT When Statutory Remedies Under CrPC Are Available: Delhi High Court Child Cannot Be Used As A Pawn To Prove Adultery Between Parents: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Plea To Examine Minor As Witness Section 156(3) CrPC | Magistrate Cannot Give Criminal Colour To Administrative Disputes By Directing FIR Registration Without Compliance With Priyanka Srivastava: High Court Contempt Of Court Act | Burden To Prove 'Willful Disobedience' Lies Upon Complainant; Merely Alleging Non-Compliance Is Insufficient: Karnataka High Court Family Court Cannot Dismiss Matrimonial Petition Merely For Lack Of 'Elaborate' Evidence In Ex-Parte Proceedings: Kerala High Court Election Petition Under Section 100 RP Act Must Be Supported By Mandatory Affidavit In Form 94A For Corrupt Practice Allegations: Madras High Court Water Act | Supreme Court Directive Overrides Previous Quashing Orders; Magistrate Can Proceed Against Municipal Officials For Unchecked Sewage Discharge: Karnataka High Court A&C Act | Arbitrator’s Decision On Jurisdiction Treated As A Preliminary Issue Amounts To An 'Interim Award' Amenable To Challenge Under Section 34: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 138 NI Act | No Requirement To Hear Accused At Pre-Cognizance Stage Under Section 223 BNSS: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 94 BNSS | Financial Institutions Entitled To Retain Custody Of Pledged Gold Provided Undertaking Is Filed Before Trial Court: Telangana High Court Family Courts Act | Section 14 Overrides Section 92 Indian Evidence Act To Admit Oral Evidence For Proving Real Source Of Funds: Kerala High Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order for Direct Transfer of Attached Property Ownership

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, May 29, 2023 - In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Justice Archana Puri, has set aside an order directing the transfer of ownership of an attached property in a decree holder's name. The case (CR-1319 of 2019) involved M/s Bassiarkh Rice Mills and another as the petitioners, and Punjab State Warehousing Corporation and others as respondents.

The dispute arose during the execution proceedings for the recovery of Rs. 44,10,440/- as per a judgment and decree issued on January 21, 2013. The decree holder filed an application seeking the transfer and sale of the attached property in their name, citing a lack of interested buyers. Consequently, the lower court issued a letter to the Tehsildar, directing the transfer of ownership to the decree holder for a sum of Rs. 60,20,000/-.

However, Justice Puri observed that the lower court's process was flawed. The court had bypassed the requirement for the decree holder's participation in the auction proceedings and ordered the direct transfer of ownership, which lacked legal provision. As a result, the High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the case back to the Executing Court.

The Executing Court has been directed to proceed with the execution from the stage of warrant of sale issuance for the attached property. If no bidders are found in the auction proceedings, the decree holder has been permitted to seek permission to participate in accordance with the law. The Executing Court has been instructed to facilitate the satisfaction of the decree dated January 21, 2013.

Decided on: 29.05.2023

M/s Bassiarkh Rice Mills and another VS Punjab State Warehousing Corporation and others 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/29-May-Bassiarkh-Vs-Punjab-Warehouse-PH-HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News