Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes FIR Against Woman For Dressing Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Personal Laws Cannot Be Used As Shield To Commit Gang Rape Under Garb Of Nikah Halala: Allahabad High Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order for Direct Transfer of Attached Property Ownership

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, May 29, 2023 - In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Justice Archana Puri, has set aside an order directing the transfer of ownership of an attached property in a decree holder's name. The case (CR-1319 of 2019) involved M/s Bassiarkh Rice Mills and another as the petitioners, and Punjab State Warehousing Corporation and others as respondents.

The dispute arose during the execution proceedings for the recovery of Rs. 44,10,440/- as per a judgment and decree issued on January 21, 2013. The decree holder filed an application seeking the transfer and sale of the attached property in their name, citing a lack of interested buyers. Consequently, the lower court issued a letter to the Tehsildar, directing the transfer of ownership to the decree holder for a sum of Rs. 60,20,000/-.

However, Justice Puri observed that the lower court's process was flawed. The court had bypassed the requirement for the decree holder's participation in the auction proceedings and ordered the direct transfer of ownership, which lacked legal provision. As a result, the High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the case back to the Executing Court.

The Executing Court has been directed to proceed with the execution from the stage of warrant of sale issuance for the attached property. If no bidders are found in the auction proceedings, the decree holder has been permitted to seek permission to participate in accordance with the law. The Executing Court has been instructed to facilitate the satisfaction of the decree dated January 21, 2013.

Decided on: 29.05.2023

M/s Bassiarkh Rice Mills and another VS Punjab State Warehousing Corporation and others 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/29-May-Bassiarkh-Vs-Punjab-Warehouse-PH-HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News