Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

Punjab and Haryana High Court Refuses Habeas Corpus in Minor Custody Case, Respects Child’s Choice to Stay with Mother

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Justice Gurvinder Singh Gill, dismissed a petition for a writ of Habeas Corpus involving the custody of a minor post-divorce, emphasizing the minor’s voluntary decision to stay with her mother.

The key legal issue addressed was whether a writ of Habeas Corpus could be invoked in a case where a minor child, post-divorce, was allegedly being illegally detained by a parent.

The petitioner, Kapil Dev, sought the recovery of his minor daughter, alleging illegal detention by her mother (respondent No.4), following a divorce decree that granted him custody. The court was tasked with determining whether the child’s stay with her mother constituted illegal detention.

Justice Gill carefully considered the circumstances surrounding the minor’s residence with her mother. The court’s intervention began with the appointment of a Warrant Officer to ascertain the facts. The Officer’s report was pivotal, revealing that the minor expressed a clear preference to live with her mother and was doing so out of her own free will.

Justice Gill noted, “In view of the stated position, wherein it is found that the alleged detenue is residing out of her own free will with none else but her mother and she wishes to reside there, this Court is of the opinion that issuance of any kind of direction is not warranted.” This observation underscored the court’s reliance on the minor’s expressed wishes.

Based on these findings, the High Court declined to issue any directive for the recovery of the minor, stating that no intervention was warranted in this case. However, the court left the door open for the petitioner to explore other legal avenues for custody, if so desired.

Date of Decision: 16th February 2024.

Kapil Dev Vs. The State of Punjab and Others

Latest Legal News