Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes Wrongful Denial of Promotion, Orders Consideration for Petitioner

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has set aside the wrongful denial of promotion to Sewak Singh, an aspiring Hindi Master. The court directed the authorities to reconsider Singh's case for promotion, stating that the denial was based on an erroneous interpretation of circular and cut-off dates. The judgment, delivered by Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, emphasized the importance of fair and just promotion procedures.

Justice Sharma, in his ruling, stated, "The denial of consideration for promotion to the petitioner is found to be wrongful and unjustified." He further highlighted that Singh possessed the requisite educational qualifications at the time of consideration, as per the circular issued by the respondent-Director of Education Department.

Singh, an ETT teacher appointed in 2001, had filed a writ petition seeking promotion to the post of Hindi Master. Despite being ranked at seniority no. 264, he was denied promotion, while lower-ranked individuals were granted the opportunity. Singh argued that there were two distinct cut-off dates mentioned in the circular - one for examining eligibility and another for sending the promotion case. The court agreed with his interpretation, deeming the exclusion from promotion as unjust.

The court's judgment directed the respondents to reconsider Singh's case for promotion in accordance with the Punjab State Education Class III (School Cadre) Service Rules 1978. If found suitable, Singh should be promoted from the date his juniors were promoted, with all consequential benefits. The judgment also ordered the revision of Singh's salary and the payment of arrears within a period of three months.

This ruling by the Punjab and Haryana High Court serves as a reminder to authorities to adhere to proper interpretation of circulars and cut-off dates while making promotion decisions. It upholds the principles of fairness and justice in the promotion process, ensuring that deserving candidates are not unjustly denied their rightful opportunities.

 Date of Decision: 12.07.2023

Sewak Singh vs State of Punjab and others

 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Sewak_Vs_State_12Jul2023_PHHC1.pdf"]

Latest Legal News