Order Taking Cognizance Must Reflect Application Of Mind; Section 197 CrPC Sanction Mandatory For Prosecuting Public Servants: Karnataka High Court Plaint Cannot Be Rejected Partially Against Specific Defendants Or Properties; Limitation Is A Triable Issue: Telangana High Court Employee Having National Trade Certificate & Prior Experience To Be Treated As 'Highly Skilled' For Compensation: Orissa High Court Insurance Company Entitled To Subpoena Investigating Officer For Vehicle Records When Insured Is Untraceable: Madras High Court Seller's Fraudulent Conduct & Non-Disclosure Of Mortgage Justify Refund Of Advance Sale Consideration: Kerala High Court Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act Filed By Partner On Behalf Of Firm Maintainable Even Without Specific Authorization Letter: Gujarat High Court Extension Of Remand Beyond 180 Days Under NDPS Act Requires Public Prosecutor's Independent Report, Not Just IO's Request: Andhra Pradesh High Court Orissa Grama Panchayats Act | No Bar On Rescheduling No-Confidence Motion Meeting Before Its Commencement: High Court Non-Preparation Of ‘Nil’ Seizure List After Searching Raiding Officer Not Fatal To NDPS Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Registration Of Trademark Confers Exclusive Right To Sue For Infringement Irrespective Of Whether Mark Is In Use: Delhi High Court Presence Of Magistrate Not Mandatory For Recording Dying Declaration; Conviction Can Be Based On DD Recorded By Police: Bombay High Court Routine Bank Transfers Between Spouses For Daily Needs Are Gratuitous Payments, Not Recoverable As Entrusted Funds: Kerala High Court Clerical Lapses Under Work Pressure Amount To Dereliction Of Duty, Not Crime: Madras High Court Quashes Corruption Case Against Deputy BDO Burden Of Proving Sale Deed Is Bona Fide Lies On Beneficiary If Executant Is Illiterate Or Vulnerable: Andhra Pradesh High Court Employee Cannot Take Advantage Of Own Delay; Employer Not Required To Preserve Disciplinary Records For Eternity: Bombay High Court Deadline To File Evidence Under Rule 45 Trade Marks Rules Is Directory, Registrar Can Extend Time Under Section 131: Bombay High Court Exclusion Of Interest In Insurance Policy Is Conditional; Insurer Must Plead & Prove Employer's Failure To Comply With Act To Avoid Liability: Kerala High Court Practicing Lawyer Entitled To Interim Maintenance From Husband If Income Is Insufficient To Maintain Standard Of Living: Orissa High Court Section 138 NI Act Offences Can Be Compounded At Any Stage Even After Dismissal Of Revision Or Appeal: Madras High Court Unsuccessful Party Seeking Post-Award Interim Relief Under Section 9 Faces 'Higher Threshold', Must Show Rare & Compelling Circumstances: Bombay High Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court Orders Preservation of Call Details Record in NDPS Case, Cites Accused’s Right to Access Evidence

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 

In a significant decision, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Justice Deepak Gupta, has ordered the preservation of call details records in a Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) case. The judgment revolves around a dispute concerning the petitioner’s arrest date and circumstances.

The petitioner, Prince, sought the quashing of an order dismissing his application to preserve the call details record of his mobile phone. The prosecution alleged Prince’s arrest on October 10, 2021, on a highway, while Prince contended that he was abducted by the police on October 9, 2021, near his house in Delhi.

Justice Deepak Gupta emphasized the accused’s right to access evidence in order to build a robust defense. The court cited precedents and noted, “Accused has to build up his defense right from the very inception after charges are framed.” The court further highlighted the importance of allowing the accused access to relevant documents, even during the cross-examination of prosecution witnesses, in order to strengthen their defense.

The court ultimately set aside the trial court’s order and directed the preservation of tower location and call details of Prince’s mobile number (85271-30528) for the period of October 9, 2021, to October 11, 2021. Copies of the records are to be provided to the petitioner, Prince.

Date of Decision: 16.08.2023

Prince vs State of Punjab      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Legal News