Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Mere Entry, Abuse Or Assault Is Not Civil Contempt – Willfulness And Dispossession Must Be Clearly Proved: Bombay High Court Magistrate Cannot Shut Eyes To Final Report After Cognizance – Supplementary Report Must Be Judicially Considered Before Framing Charges: Allahabad High Court Examination-in-Chief Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction Amid Serious Doubts: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal in Grievous Hurt Case Employees Cannot Pick Favourable Terms and Reject the Rest: Bombay High Court Upholds SIDBI’s Cut-Off Date for Pension to CPF Optees Cannot Reclaim Absolute Ownership After Letting Your Declaration Suit Fail: AP High Court Enforces Finality in Partition Appeal Death Due to Fat Embolism and Delayed Treatment Is Not Culpable Homicide: Orissa High Court Converts 30-Year-Old 304 Part-I Conviction to Grievous Hurt Fabricated Lease Cannot Be Sanctified by Consolidation Entry: Orissa High Court Dismisses 36-Year-Old Second Appeal Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Mere Long Possession By One Co-Owner Does Not Destroy The Co-Ownership Right Of The Other: Madras High Court State Cannot Hide Behind An Illegal Undertaking: Punjab & Haryana High Court Questions Denial Of Retrospective Regularization

Punjab and Haryana High Court Orders Preservation of Call Details Record in NDPS Case, Cites Accused’s Right to Access Evidence

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 

In a significant decision, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Justice Deepak Gupta, has ordered the preservation of call details records in a Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) case. The judgment revolves around a dispute concerning the petitioner’s arrest date and circumstances.

The petitioner, Prince, sought the quashing of an order dismissing his application to preserve the call details record of his mobile phone. The prosecution alleged Prince’s arrest on October 10, 2021, on a highway, while Prince contended that he was abducted by the police on October 9, 2021, near his house in Delhi.

Justice Deepak Gupta emphasized the accused’s right to access evidence in order to build a robust defense. The court cited precedents and noted, “Accused has to build up his defense right from the very inception after charges are framed.” The court further highlighted the importance of allowing the accused access to relevant documents, even during the cross-examination of prosecution witnesses, in order to strengthen their defense.

The court ultimately set aside the trial court’s order and directed the preservation of tower location and call details of Prince’s mobile number (85271-30528) for the period of October 9, 2021, to October 11, 2021. Copies of the records are to be provided to the petitioner, Prince.

Date of Decision: 16.08.2023

Prince vs State of Punjab      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Legal News