Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Punjab and Haryana High Court Orders Preservation of Call Details Record in NDPS Case, Cites Accused’s Right to Access Evidence

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 

In a significant decision, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Justice Deepak Gupta, has ordered the preservation of call details records in a Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) case. The judgment revolves around a dispute concerning the petitioner’s arrest date and circumstances.

The petitioner, Prince, sought the quashing of an order dismissing his application to preserve the call details record of his mobile phone. The prosecution alleged Prince’s arrest on October 10, 2021, on a highway, while Prince contended that he was abducted by the police on October 9, 2021, near his house in Delhi.

Justice Deepak Gupta emphasized the accused’s right to access evidence in order to build a robust defense. The court cited precedents and noted, “Accused has to build up his defense right from the very inception after charges are framed.” The court further highlighted the importance of allowing the accused access to relevant documents, even during the cross-examination of prosecution witnesses, in order to strengthen their defense.

The court ultimately set aside the trial court’s order and directed the preservation of tower location and call details of Prince’s mobile number (85271-30528) for the period of October 9, 2021, to October 11, 2021. Copies of the records are to be provided to the petitioner, Prince.

Date of Decision: 16.08.2023

Prince vs State of Punjab      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Legal News