Sold Property During Pending Appeal, Defied Court Order: Andhra Pradesh High Court Sends Man To Jail For Contempt Hostile Witness Cannot Erase a Bribe Demand Already Made on Record: Supreme Court Restores Conviction of Ration Officer Three Decades of Unpaid Wages: Supreme Court Strips Gannon Dunkerley of Control Over Sick Company's Assets, Appoints Administrator to Pay Workers by August 2026 Gram Nyayalaya Cannot Touch Family Court's Maintenance Orders — Allahabad High Court Draws the Line Caste Abuse Allegation at Village Jatra Is Counter-Blast to Earlier Machete Attack: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail Despite SC/ST Act Bar Contributory Negligence | Not Wearing a Helmet Does Not Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Madras High Court Air Force Can't Punish Officer After Criminal Court Sets Him Free: Supreme Court Overturns 30-Year-Old Dismissal Written Statement Without Affidavit of Admission/Denial: Non-Est Filing or Curable Defect? Delhi High Court Refers Conflicting Views to Larger Bench Bank's Negligence Killed Cheque Bounce Case Before It Could Begin: Supreme Court Rules Section 138 Remedy Lost Due to Stale Cheques Bank Letting Your Cheques Go Stale Is Deficiency in Service: Supreme Court Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Benefit Of Probation Act Available Even If Offender Is Sentenced Solely To Fine: Supreme Court Reporting Registration Of FIR Based On Public Records Does Not Violate Right To Privacy: Sikkim High Court CBSE Cannot Cancel Class XII Results Based on Similar MCQ Answers Alone Without Any Report of Malpractice From Examination Centre: Orissa High Court

"Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Bail, Citing Prolonged Custody and Completed Investigation in IPC and Arms Act Case"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to Dilraj Singh, also known as Raja, in a case involving charges under Sections 307/120-B/427/34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959. The petitioner had filed for regular bail after having been previously held in custody. The court, presided over by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN, made the decision on August 28, 2023.

The court noted the petitioner's argument that his alleged motive was implausible due to his separation from the concerned party, whose marriage had been dissolved by mutual consent. Moreover, the petitioner claimed he was out of the country at the time of the alleged incident, casting doubt on his involvement.

Counsel for the petitioner stressed the significant duration of the petitioner's incarceration and highlighted the completion of the investigation, which had led to the presentation of the challan. The counsel emphasized the petitioner's lack of a criminal history and the lack of substantial evidence against him.

In its decision, the court granted bail to the petitioner, acknowledging the extended period of his custody and the completed investigation. The bail was granted subject to the petitioner furnishing bail/surety bonds that met the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate. The court explicitly clarified that the decision to grant bail did not indicate any opinion on the case's merits.

Date of Decision: 28.08.2023

DILRAJ SINGH ALIAS RAJA vs STATE OF PUNJAB   

Latest Legal News