Promotees Allowed to Challenge Provisional Seniority List in Dispute Between Direct Recruitment and Promotion: Kerala High Court Frivolous Defenses Cannot Justify Leave to Defend Under Order XXXVII CPC Delhi High Court Candidates Merely Enrolled in Final Year B.V.Sc. Program Ineligible for Veterinary Officer Recruitment: Rajasthan High Court Manufacturing or Sale of Garments Does Not Attract Copyright Protection; Procedural Violations Under Trade Marks Act Renders Prosecution Unsustainable: P&H High Court Ownership Alone Is Not Sufficient to Maintain Eviction Suit; Plaintiff Must Qualify as a Lessor Under Lease Agreement: Calcutta High Court Findings Based on Evidence Cannot Be Interfered With in a Second Appeal Without Substantial Question of Law: AP High Court Chain of Circumstances Broken: Inferences Cannot Replace Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Kerala High Court Bail | Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 of the Constitution: Bombay High Court Encroachment on a Common Lane Gives Rise to Recurring Cause of Action: Madras High Court Holds Limitation Act Inapplicable to Pathway Disputes Reproductive Autonomy Includes the Right to Abort Without Spousal Consent: P&H High Court Access to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 is Not an Absolute Bar Against MSEFC Awards: Supreme Court Refers Key Questions on Writ Jurisdiction to Larger Bench Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted for Title and Mortgage Disputes Under SARFAESI Act: Supreme Court Principle of Bail is the Rule, Jail is the Exception: Supreme Court Panchayat Law | Mandatory Compliance With Section 34 And Rule 3 Is Non-Negotiable In Resignation Cases: Bombay High Court Quashes Resignation Of Upa-Sarpanch Recovery of Bullet Fired from Accused’s Weapon Crucial: PH High Court Reaffirms Conviction in Murder Case Injured Witness Evidence Carries Built-in Reliability Unless Contradicted Significantly: Kerala High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Murder Case Civil Dispute with Criminal Elements Cannot Be Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.: Karnataka High Court Issuance of Summons Under Section 91 CrPC During Preliminary Verification is Without Jurisdiction: High Court of J&K and Ladakh Article 21 Prevails Over NDPS Act’s Section 37 Restrictions in Cases of Prolonged Incarceration: Delhi High Court Once a Property is Waqf, It Remains Waqf Perpetually: Calcutta High Court Affirms No Secular Ownership Can Derive from Waqf Properties Surveillance Without Opportunity to Object Violates Articles 14, 19, and 21: Allahabad High Court Quashes Class-B History Sheets Mandatory Provisions of Order XXI CPC Were Violated, Rendering the Auction Sale Illegal: Punjab and Haryana High Court

"Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Bail, Citing Prolonged Custody and Completed Investigation in IPC and Arms Act Case"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to Dilraj Singh, also known as Raja, in a case involving charges under Sections 307/120-B/427/34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959. The petitioner had filed for regular bail after having been previously held in custody. The court, presided over by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN, made the decision on August 28, 2023.

The court noted the petitioner's argument that his alleged motive was implausible due to his separation from the concerned party, whose marriage had been dissolved by mutual consent. Moreover, the petitioner claimed he was out of the country at the time of the alleged incident, casting doubt on his involvement.

Counsel for the petitioner stressed the significant duration of the petitioner's incarceration and highlighted the completion of the investigation, which had led to the presentation of the challan. The counsel emphasized the petitioner's lack of a criminal history and the lack of substantial evidence against him.

In its decision, the court granted bail to the petitioner, acknowledging the extended period of his custody and the completed investigation. The bail was granted subject to the petitioner furnishing bail/surety bonds that met the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate. The court explicitly clarified that the decision to grant bail did not indicate any opinion on the case's merits.

Date of Decision: 28.08.2023

DILRAJ SINGH ALIAS RAJA vs STATE OF PUNJAB   

Similar News