No Work No Pay: Delhi High Court Denies Back Wages To Reinstated Army Officer State Cannot Use 'Delay & Laches' To Evade Compensation For Land Taken Without Authority Of Law: Calcutta High Court Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Jail Appeal Solely On 3157-Day Delay; Orders Release Of Life Convict After 22 Years In Jail 138 NI Act | Failure To Produce Income Tax Returns Not Fatal To Cheque Bounce Case If Debt Is Established: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Public Records Not In Party's 'Power Or Possession' Until Actually Obtained; Leave Not Required For Rebuttal Documents: AP High Court For Conviction Under Section 34 IPC, Prosecution Must Establish Prior Meeting Of Minds & Pre-Arranged Plan: Allahabad High Court Merciless Beating With Blunt Side Of Deadly Weapons To Spread Terror Constitutes Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court CIT Can’t Invoke Revisionary Jurisdiction Merely Because AO’s Enquiry Was ‘Inadequate’ If View Is Plausible: Bombay High Court Mere Presence At Crime Scene Without Proof Of Prior Concert Insufficient To Invoke Section 34 IPC For Murder: Supreme Court Courts Cannot Be Used As Tools For Coercion: Bombay HC Dismisses Application To Implead Developer Without Contractual Nexus, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Cost Specific Performance Cannot Be Granted For Contingent Contracts Dependent On Third-Party Conveyance: Madras High Court Unlawful Subletting Is A ‘Continuing Wrong’, Fresh Limitation Period Runs As Long As Breach Continues: Bombay High Court Courts Must Specify Payment Timeline In Specific Performance Decrees; Order XX Rule 12A CPC Is Mandatory: Supreme Court Specific Performance Decree Does Not Automatically Rescind Due To Delay; Courts Can Extend Time For Deposit: Supreme Court Madras High Court Quashes Forgery Case Against Mahindra World City After Victims Accept Alternate Land In Settlement Motor Accident Claims: 13-Day FIR Delay Not Fatal; 80% Physical Disability Can Be Treated As 100% Functional Disability: Punjab & Haryana HC Murderer Cannot Inherit Property From Victim Through Wills; Section 25 Hindu Succession Act Bar Applies To Testamentary Succession: Supreme Court Courts Must Pierce Veil Of Clever Drafting To Reject Suits Barred By Benami Law; 2016 Amendments Are Retrospective: Supreme Court Indian Railways Is A Consumer, Not A Deemed Distribution Licensee; Must Pay Cross-Subsidy Surcharge For Open Access: Supreme Court Technical Rules Of Evidence Act Do Not Apply To Departmental Enquiries: Supreme Court Public Employment Cannot Be Converted Into An Instrument Of Fraud; Police Personnel Using Dual Identity Strikes At Root Of Service: Supreme Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Additional Opportunity to File Written Statement in Land Dispute Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court exercised its discretion and granted an additional opportunity to the defendant to file a written statement in a land dispute case. The court set aside the order passed by the trial court, which had struck off the defendant's defense due to the non-availability of complete records.

The case involved a suit for possession by way of partition and permanent injunction filed by the plaintiff, Ram Kumar, concerning a two-storied shop in Bichla Bazar, Pan Manan, Bhiwani. The defendant, Gigraj @ Giga Ram Jain, sought an extension to file the written statement, citing the inability to prepare it within the prescribed time frame.

Mr. Ajay Jain, the advocate representing the petitioner, argued that granting another opportunity, along with the payment of costs, would enable the defendant to file a proper written statement. He relied on a previous order of the court that allowed a similar opportunity in comparable circumstances.

While Mr. Alok Mittal, the advocate representing the respondents, objected to granting another chance, asserting the petitioner's casual approach, the court stressed the significance of pleadings in ensuring a just and proper adjudication of the case.

The Honorable Justice Sanjay Vashisth, delivering the judgment, stated, "It is always good for the court to find a solution by deciding the controversy after inviting response from all the concerned parties. Court cannot function on the principle of technicalities or in a specified mechanised manner." The court acknowledged the importance of giving reasonable opportunities for the parties to present their stand through pleadings.

Considering the circumstances, the court set aside the trial court's order and granted the defendant one more effective opportunity to file the written statement by a specified deadline. The court also directed the petitioner to pay costs of Rs. 10,000, to be deposited in the "District Bar Association Bhiwani A/c Welfare Fund."

The judgment serves as a reminder of the court's discretion in granting additional opportunities while ensuring a fair and just resolution to the case.

Date of Decision: 12.07.2023

Gigraj @ Giga Ram Jain vs Ram Kumar and others

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Gigraj_Vs_Rajkumar_12July23_PHHC1.pdf"]

Latest Legal News