Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Additional Opportunity to File Written Statement in Land Dispute Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court exercised its discretion and granted an additional opportunity to the defendant to file a written statement in a land dispute case. The court set aside the order passed by the trial court, which had struck off the defendant's defense due to the non-availability of complete records.

The case involved a suit for possession by way of partition and permanent injunction filed by the plaintiff, Ram Kumar, concerning a two-storied shop in Bichla Bazar, Pan Manan, Bhiwani. The defendant, Gigraj @ Giga Ram Jain, sought an extension to file the written statement, citing the inability to prepare it within the prescribed time frame.

Mr. Ajay Jain, the advocate representing the petitioner, argued that granting another opportunity, along with the payment of costs, would enable the defendant to file a proper written statement. He relied on a previous order of the court that allowed a similar opportunity in comparable circumstances.

While Mr. Alok Mittal, the advocate representing the respondents, objected to granting another chance, asserting the petitioner's casual approach, the court stressed the significance of pleadings in ensuring a just and proper adjudication of the case.

The Honorable Justice Sanjay Vashisth, delivering the judgment, stated, "It is always good for the court to find a solution by deciding the controversy after inviting response from all the concerned parties. Court cannot function on the principle of technicalities or in a specified mechanised manner." The court acknowledged the importance of giving reasonable opportunities for the parties to present their stand through pleadings.

Considering the circumstances, the court set aside the trial court's order and granted the defendant one more effective opportunity to file the written statement by a specified deadline. The court also directed the petitioner to pay costs of Rs. 10,000, to be deposited in the "District Bar Association Bhiwani A/c Welfare Fund."

The judgment serves as a reminder of the court's discretion in granting additional opportunities while ensuring a fair and just resolution to the case.

Date of Decision: 12.07.2023

Gigraj @ Giga Ram Jain vs Ram Kumar and others

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Gigraj_Vs_Rajkumar_12July23_PHHC1.pdf"]

Latest Legal News