Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Additional Opportunity to File Written Statement in Land Dispute Case

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court exercised its discretion and granted an additional opportunity to the defendant to file a written statement in a land dispute case. The court set aside the order passed by the trial court, which had struck off the defendant's defense due to the non-availability of complete records.

The case involved a suit for possession by way of partition and permanent injunction filed by the plaintiff, Ram Kumar, concerning a two-storied shop in Bichla Bazar, Pan Manan, Bhiwani. The defendant, Gigraj @ Giga Ram Jain, sought an extension to file the written statement, citing the inability to prepare it within the prescribed time frame.

Mr. Ajay Jain, the advocate representing the petitioner, argued that granting another opportunity, along with the payment of costs, would enable the defendant to file a proper written statement. He relied on a previous order of the court that allowed a similar opportunity in comparable circumstances.

While Mr. Alok Mittal, the advocate representing the respondents, objected to granting another chance, asserting the petitioner's casual approach, the court stressed the significance of pleadings in ensuring a just and proper adjudication of the case.

The Honorable Justice Sanjay Vashisth, delivering the judgment, stated, "It is always good for the court to find a solution by deciding the controversy after inviting response from all the concerned parties. Court cannot function on the principle of technicalities or in a specified mechanised manner." The court acknowledged the importance of giving reasonable opportunities for the parties to present their stand through pleadings.

Considering the circumstances, the court set aside the trial court's order and granted the defendant one more effective opportunity to file the written statement by a specified deadline. The court also directed the petitioner to pay costs of Rs. 10,000, to be deposited in the "District Bar Association Bhiwani A/c Welfare Fund."

The judgment serves as a reminder of the court's discretion in granting additional opportunities while ensuring a fair and just resolution to the case.

Date of Decision: 12.07.2023

Gigraj @ Giga Ram Jain vs Ram Kumar and others

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Gigraj_Vs_Rajkumar_12July23_PHHC1.pdf"]

Latest Legal News