Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Additional Opportunity to File Written Statement in Land Dispute Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court exercised its discretion and granted an additional opportunity to the defendant to file a written statement in a land dispute case. The court set aside the order passed by the trial court, which had struck off the defendant's defense due to the non-availability of complete records.

The case involved a suit for possession by way of partition and permanent injunction filed by the plaintiff, Ram Kumar, concerning a two-storied shop in Bichla Bazar, Pan Manan, Bhiwani. The defendant, Gigraj @ Giga Ram Jain, sought an extension to file the written statement, citing the inability to prepare it within the prescribed time frame.

Mr. Ajay Jain, the advocate representing the petitioner, argued that granting another opportunity, along with the payment of costs, would enable the defendant to file a proper written statement. He relied on a previous order of the court that allowed a similar opportunity in comparable circumstances.

While Mr. Alok Mittal, the advocate representing the respondents, objected to granting another chance, asserting the petitioner's casual approach, the court stressed the significance of pleadings in ensuring a just and proper adjudication of the case.

The Honorable Justice Sanjay Vashisth, delivering the judgment, stated, "It is always good for the court to find a solution by deciding the controversy after inviting response from all the concerned parties. Court cannot function on the principle of technicalities or in a specified mechanised manner." The court acknowledged the importance of giving reasonable opportunities for the parties to present their stand through pleadings.

Considering the circumstances, the court set aside the trial court's order and granted the defendant one more effective opportunity to file the written statement by a specified deadline. The court also directed the petitioner to pay costs of Rs. 10,000, to be deposited in the "District Bar Association Bhiwani A/c Welfare Fund."

The judgment serves as a reminder of the court's discretion in granting additional opportunities while ensuring a fair and just resolution to the case.

Date of Decision: 12.07.2023

Gigraj @ Giga Ram Jain vs Ram Kumar and others

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Gigraj_Vs_Rajkumar_12July23_PHHC1.pdf"]

Latest Legal News