Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Accused Not Entitled To Copies Of 'Unrelied' Upon Documents At The Stage Of Framing Of Charges Under Section 91 CrPC: Supreme Court Elected Representatives Have No Privilege To Resort To Violence; Criminal Antecedents Are Material For Bail Adjudication: Supreme Court Mere Absence Of Transport Documents Does Not Create A Presumption Of Violation Of Chhattisgarh Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act, 2004: Supreme Court Section 396 IPC | Conviction For 'Dacoity With Murder' Requires Proof That Murder Was Committed In The Course Of Dacoity: Allahabad High Court 'Developers Cannot Delay Conveyance For Eternity And Milk Additional FSI Benefits': Bombay High Court Upholds Societies' Deemed Conveyance Pre-Approval Statutory Dues Stand Extinguished Upon Approval Of Resolution Plan; GST Authorities Cannot Initiate Fresh Proceedings: Calcutta High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell With Delivery Of Possession Is Admissible In A Suit For Specific Performance: Delhi High Court Stigmatic Order Discharging Probationer Without Inquiry Is Void For Violation Of Natural Justice: Gujarat High Court Execution Proceedings | Court Cannot Impose Arbitrary Financial Conditions Without Reason In Stay Applications: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 528 BNSS | High Court Cannot Exercise Inherent Powers To Circumvent Statutory Bar Against Second Revision: Delhi High Court Advocate Empanelment | Restriction On Multiple Applications Is A Procedural Choice Within Employer’s Domain: Delhi High Court Acquittal Appeal | Double Presumption Of Innocence In Favour Of Accused Cannot Be Disturbed Merely Because Another View Is Possible: Gujarat High Court SC/ST Act | Offence Under Section 3(1)(g) Not Attracted If Dispossession Or Interference Is Not Due To Victim's Caste: Himachal Pradesh High Court Judicial Officer Must Maintain Distance From Practicing Advocates To Avoid Impropriety: Gujarat High Court Upholds Dismissal Section 183 BNSS | Investigating Officer Cannot Independently Record Further Statement Of Victim After Recording Before Magistrate: Karnataka High Court Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Punjab and Haryana High Court Directs Immediate Demarcation of Hadda Rori Land and Initiates Eviction Proceedings

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment delivered on 19th April 2023, a division bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court comprising of Justice Sureshwar Thakur and Justice Kuldeep Tiwari directed the immediate demarcation of Hadda Rori land and initiated eviction proceedings against unauthorized occupants. The judgment came in response to a writ petition filed by Rashpinderpal and another petitioner against the State of Punjab and others.

The petitioners had sought a mandamus from the court to ensure the valid demarcation of the land comprised in Khatauni No.178 Khasra No.1-1206/175 (1-3)(0-9-69-54), which was reserved for Hadda Rori. They contended that unauthorized occupation of the land was taking place, and a lawful demarcation report was necessary to establish their claim before the Competent Authority.

The court observed that the respondents were causing undue delays in carrying out a lawful demarcation of the petition lands. It acknowledged the importance of preventing unauthorized occupation of Hadda Rori lands and the need for the beneficiaries of the demarcation report to file a motion under the relevant statute.

Accordingly, the court allowed the writ petition and directed the empowered Revenue Officer to immediately conduct a lawful demarcation of the petition lands. Furthermore, the court ordered the Revenue Officer to supply a certified copy of the demarcation report to the Block Development and Panchayat Officer (BDPO), enabling them to take appropriate action against any encroachments found on the designated Hadda Rori lands.

If the demarcation report reveals any encroachments, the BDPO was directed to file a petition under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961. This petition would initiate eviction proceedings against the encroachers. The court emphasized the need for prompt action and directed the BDPO to file the petition before the Collector, who would make a lawful decision after hearing all concerned parties within three months of receiving the petition.

The judgment highlighted the court's concern over unauthorized occupation and the importance of expediting the demarcation process. It aimed to ensure that the lands reserved for Hadda Rori are protected from encroachments and that lawful measures are taken to evict any unauthorized occupants.

Date: 19th April 2023

Rashpinderpal and Anr vs State of Punjab and Others

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/P^0H-14-April-23-Rashpinderpal-Vs-State.pdf"]

 

Latest Legal News