Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Punjab and Haryana High Court Directs Immediate Demarcation of Hadda Rori Land and Initiates Eviction Proceedings

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment delivered on 19th April 2023, a division bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court comprising of Justice Sureshwar Thakur and Justice Kuldeep Tiwari directed the immediate demarcation of Hadda Rori land and initiated eviction proceedings against unauthorized occupants. The judgment came in response to a writ petition filed by Rashpinderpal and another petitioner against the State of Punjab and others.

The petitioners had sought a mandamus from the court to ensure the valid demarcation of the land comprised in Khatauni No.178 Khasra No.1-1206/175 (1-3)(0-9-69-54), which was reserved for Hadda Rori. They contended that unauthorized occupation of the land was taking place, and a lawful demarcation report was necessary to establish their claim before the Competent Authority.

The court observed that the respondents were causing undue delays in carrying out a lawful demarcation of the petition lands. It acknowledged the importance of preventing unauthorized occupation of Hadda Rori lands and the need for the beneficiaries of the demarcation report to file a motion under the relevant statute.

Accordingly, the court allowed the writ petition and directed the empowered Revenue Officer to immediately conduct a lawful demarcation of the petition lands. Furthermore, the court ordered the Revenue Officer to supply a certified copy of the demarcation report to the Block Development and Panchayat Officer (BDPO), enabling them to take appropriate action against any encroachments found on the designated Hadda Rori lands.

If the demarcation report reveals any encroachments, the BDPO was directed to file a petition under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961. This petition would initiate eviction proceedings against the encroachers. The court emphasized the need for prompt action and directed the BDPO to file the petition before the Collector, who would make a lawful decision after hearing all concerned parties within three months of receiving the petition.

The judgment highlighted the court's concern over unauthorized occupation and the importance of expediting the demarcation process. It aimed to ensure that the lands reserved for Hadda Rori are protected from encroachments and that lawful measures are taken to evict any unauthorized occupants.

Date: 19th April 2023

Rashpinderpal and Anr vs State of Punjab and Others

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/P^0H-14-April-23-Rashpinderpal-Vs-State.pdf"]

 

Latest Legal News