Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court Ban Junk Food Within 50 Metres Of Schools: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Moto Cognizance To Enforce FSSAI Norms, Protect Children From Obesity

Punjab and Haryana High Court Directs Immediate Demarcation of Hadda Rori Land and Initiates Eviction Proceedings

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment delivered on 19th April 2023, a division bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court comprising of Justice Sureshwar Thakur and Justice Kuldeep Tiwari directed the immediate demarcation of Hadda Rori land and initiated eviction proceedings against unauthorized occupants. The judgment came in response to a writ petition filed by Rashpinderpal and another petitioner against the State of Punjab and others.

The petitioners had sought a mandamus from the court to ensure the valid demarcation of the land comprised in Khatauni No.178 Khasra No.1-1206/175 (1-3)(0-9-69-54), which was reserved for Hadda Rori. They contended that unauthorized occupation of the land was taking place, and a lawful demarcation report was necessary to establish their claim before the Competent Authority.

The court observed that the respondents were causing undue delays in carrying out a lawful demarcation of the petition lands. It acknowledged the importance of preventing unauthorized occupation of Hadda Rori lands and the need for the beneficiaries of the demarcation report to file a motion under the relevant statute.

Accordingly, the court allowed the writ petition and directed the empowered Revenue Officer to immediately conduct a lawful demarcation of the petition lands. Furthermore, the court ordered the Revenue Officer to supply a certified copy of the demarcation report to the Block Development and Panchayat Officer (BDPO), enabling them to take appropriate action against any encroachments found on the designated Hadda Rori lands.

If the demarcation report reveals any encroachments, the BDPO was directed to file a petition under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961. This petition would initiate eviction proceedings against the encroachers. The court emphasized the need for prompt action and directed the BDPO to file the petition before the Collector, who would make a lawful decision after hearing all concerned parties within three months of receiving the petition.

The judgment highlighted the court's concern over unauthorized occupation and the importance of expediting the demarcation process. It aimed to ensure that the lands reserved for Hadda Rori are protected from encroachments and that lawful measures are taken to evict any unauthorized occupants.

Date: 19th April 2023

Rashpinderpal and Anr vs State of Punjab and Others

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/P^0H-14-April-23-Rashpinderpal-Vs-State.pdf"]

 

Latest Legal News