Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case

Property Rights: Karta of the HUF Entitled to Mortgage the HUF Property: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India reaffirmed the rights of the Karta in a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) to mortgage HUF property. The ruling came in response to Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2147621477/2023, originating from a judgment by the High Court of Judicature at Madras at Madurai.

The Court's observation was crystal clear: "The father of the petitioner herein, as the Karta of the HUF, was entitled to mortgage the HUF property." This assertion emphasizes the authority of the Karta in HUF matters and underscores their right to make decisions regarding HUF property, even without the consent of other members.

The case revolved around a joint family property that was mortgaged by the petitioner's father as one of the guarantors. The petitioner argued that the property was a part of the HUF, with his father serving as the Karta. The Court cited the well-established principle that the Karta has the right to sell, dispose of, or alienate HUF property, even without the consent of other family members.

Crucially, the judgment highlighted that a coparcener may challenge the actions of a Karta post-alienation, but only if the alienation was not for legal necessity or the betterment of the estate. In this particular case, no such assertion was proven.

As a result, the Supreme Court upheld the impugned judgment, dismissing the special leave petitions. This ruling not only clarifies the role and authority of the Karta in HUF property matters but also underscores the importance of legal necessity or estate improvement in such transactions.

This judgment is expected to have significant implications for property rights within Hindu Undivided Families, reaffirming the rights of the Karta and providing guidance on when challenges to their actions can be considered valid.

Legal experts and scholars have lauded this decision as a significant step in upholding the traditions and principles of Hindu family law while also providing clarity on property transactions within HUFs.

Date of Decision: 03-10-2023

N.S. BALAJI VS  THE PRESIDING OFFICER DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL & ORS. 

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/N_S_Balaji_vs_The_Presiding_Officer_Debt_on_3_October_2023.pdf"]

Latest Legal News