Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

Property Rights: Karta of the HUF Entitled to Mortgage the HUF Property: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India reaffirmed the rights of the Karta in a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) to mortgage HUF property. The ruling came in response to Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2147621477/2023, originating from a judgment by the High Court of Judicature at Madras at Madurai.

The Court's observation was crystal clear: "The father of the petitioner herein, as the Karta of the HUF, was entitled to mortgage the HUF property." This assertion emphasizes the authority of the Karta in HUF matters and underscores their right to make decisions regarding HUF property, even without the consent of other members.

The case revolved around a joint family property that was mortgaged by the petitioner's father as one of the guarantors. The petitioner argued that the property was a part of the HUF, with his father serving as the Karta. The Court cited the well-established principle that the Karta has the right to sell, dispose of, or alienate HUF property, even without the consent of other family members.

Crucially, the judgment highlighted that a coparcener may challenge the actions of a Karta post-alienation, but only if the alienation was not for legal necessity or the betterment of the estate. In this particular case, no such assertion was proven.

As a result, the Supreme Court upheld the impugned judgment, dismissing the special leave petitions. This ruling not only clarifies the role and authority of the Karta in HUF property matters but also underscores the importance of legal necessity or estate improvement in such transactions.

This judgment is expected to have significant implications for property rights within Hindu Undivided Families, reaffirming the rights of the Karta and providing guidance on when challenges to their actions can be considered valid.

Legal experts and scholars have lauded this decision as a significant step in upholding the traditions and principles of Hindu family law while also providing clarity on property transactions within HUFs.

Date of Decision: 03-10-2023

N.S. BALAJI VS  THE PRESIDING OFFICER DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL & ORS. 

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/N_S_Balaji_vs_The_Presiding_Officer_Debt_on_3_October_2023.pdf"]

Similar News