Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Property Rights: Karta of the HUF Entitled to Mortgage the HUF Property: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India reaffirmed the rights of the Karta in a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) to mortgage HUF property. The ruling came in response to Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2147621477/2023, originating from a judgment by the High Court of Judicature at Madras at Madurai.

The Court's observation was crystal clear: "The father of the petitioner herein, as the Karta of the HUF, was entitled to mortgage the HUF property." This assertion emphasizes the authority of the Karta in HUF matters and underscores their right to make decisions regarding HUF property, even without the consent of other members.

The case revolved around a joint family property that was mortgaged by the petitioner's father as one of the guarantors. The petitioner argued that the property was a part of the HUF, with his father serving as the Karta. The Court cited the well-established principle that the Karta has the right to sell, dispose of, or alienate HUF property, even without the consent of other family members.

Crucially, the judgment highlighted that a coparcener may challenge the actions of a Karta post-alienation, but only if the alienation was not for legal necessity or the betterment of the estate. In this particular case, no such assertion was proven.

As a result, the Supreme Court upheld the impugned judgment, dismissing the special leave petitions. This ruling not only clarifies the role and authority of the Karta in HUF property matters but also underscores the importance of legal necessity or estate improvement in such transactions.

This judgment is expected to have significant implications for property rights within Hindu Undivided Families, reaffirming the rights of the Karta and providing guidance on when challenges to their actions can be considered valid.

Legal experts and scholars have lauded this decision as a significant step in upholding the traditions and principles of Hindu family law while also providing clarity on property transactions within HUFs.

Date of Decision: 03-10-2023

N.S. BALAJI VS  THE PRESIDING OFFICER DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL & ORS. 

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/N_S_Balaji_vs_The_Presiding_Officer_Debt_on_3_October_2023.pdf"]

Latest Legal News