Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

Property Rights: Karta of the HUF Entitled to Mortgage the HUF Property: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India reaffirmed the rights of the Karta in a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) to mortgage HUF property. The ruling came in response to Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2147621477/2023, originating from a judgment by the High Court of Judicature at Madras at Madurai.

The Court's observation was crystal clear: "The father of the petitioner herein, as the Karta of the HUF, was entitled to mortgage the HUF property." This assertion emphasizes the authority of the Karta in HUF matters and underscores their right to make decisions regarding HUF property, even without the consent of other members.

The case revolved around a joint family property that was mortgaged by the petitioner's father as one of the guarantors. The petitioner argued that the property was a part of the HUF, with his father serving as the Karta. The Court cited the well-established principle that the Karta has the right to sell, dispose of, or alienate HUF property, even without the consent of other family members.

Crucially, the judgment highlighted that a coparcener may challenge the actions of a Karta post-alienation, but only if the alienation was not for legal necessity or the betterment of the estate. In this particular case, no such assertion was proven.

As a result, the Supreme Court upheld the impugned judgment, dismissing the special leave petitions. This ruling not only clarifies the role and authority of the Karta in HUF property matters but also underscores the importance of legal necessity or estate improvement in such transactions.

This judgment is expected to have significant implications for property rights within Hindu Undivided Families, reaffirming the rights of the Karta and providing guidance on when challenges to their actions can be considered valid.

Legal experts and scholars have lauded this decision as a significant step in upholding the traditions and principles of Hindu family law while also providing clarity on property transactions within HUFs.

Date of Decision: 03-10-2023

N.S. BALAJI VS  THE PRESIDING OFFICER DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL & ORS. 

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/N_S_Balaji_vs_The_Presiding_Officer_Debt_on_3_October_2023.pdf"]

Similar News