Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Writ Petition Cannot Be Dismissed On ‘Forum Non Conveniens’ If Respondent's Office Is Within Court's Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Supreme Court Doubts 'Sajjan Singh' Ruling; Refers To Larger Bench Whether Third Judge Can Re-examine Unanimous Findings Under Section 392 CrPC SARFAESI Sale Vitiated If Balance 75% Bid Amount Is Paid Beyond 15 Days Without Written Extension Agreement: Supreme Court Delhi High Court Can't Refuse Writ Petition Against BSF Dismissal Merely Because Cause Of Action Arose Outside Delhi: Supreme Court Private Rights Must Yield To Public Interest: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Removal Of Encroachments On Public Road Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Re-Agitate Factual Disputes Or Seek Re-Hearing On Merits: Allahabad High Court Recovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act Vitiated If Police Already Present At Spot Before Arrival Of Panch Witnesses: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Compliance Or Delay In Procedure Under Section 52A NDPS Act Is An Irregularity, Not An Illegality Entitling Accused To Bail: Calcutta High Court Recovery Of Weapon Used In Commission Of Offence Not A Sine Qua Non For Conviction If Ocular Evidence Is Corroborated: Allahabad High Court Seized Vehicles Shouldn't Be Kept Idle To Rot In Police Stations, Utility Vanishes Due To Stagnation: Karnataka High Court Or 39 CPC | Trial Court Erred In Dismissing Injunction Application Despite Respondent's 'No Objection' To Restraining Share Transfer: Gauhati High Court Issuing NBW Merely For Absence Of Accused Already On Bail Is Improper; Liberty Cannot Be Dealt With Lightly: Orissa High Court 138 NI | Expert Examination Of Disputed Documents Essential For Just Adjudication If Complainant Denies Handwriting & Signatures: Rajasthan High Court Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Cannot Be Invoked To Fill Lacunae In Evidence If Party Voluntarily Closed Evidence In Trial Court: Delhi High Court

Property Rights: Karta of the HUF Entitled to Mortgage the HUF Property: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India reaffirmed the rights of the Karta in a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) to mortgage HUF property. The ruling came in response to Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2147621477/2023, originating from a judgment by the High Court of Judicature at Madras at Madurai.

The Court's observation was crystal clear: "The father of the petitioner herein, as the Karta of the HUF, was entitled to mortgage the HUF property." This assertion emphasizes the authority of the Karta in HUF matters and underscores their right to make decisions regarding HUF property, even without the consent of other members.

The case revolved around a joint family property that was mortgaged by the petitioner's father as one of the guarantors. The petitioner argued that the property was a part of the HUF, with his father serving as the Karta. The Court cited the well-established principle that the Karta has the right to sell, dispose of, or alienate HUF property, even without the consent of other family members.

Crucially, the judgment highlighted that a coparcener may challenge the actions of a Karta post-alienation, but only if the alienation was not for legal necessity or the betterment of the estate. In this particular case, no such assertion was proven.

As a result, the Supreme Court upheld the impugned judgment, dismissing the special leave petitions. This ruling not only clarifies the role and authority of the Karta in HUF property matters but also underscores the importance of legal necessity or estate improvement in such transactions.

This judgment is expected to have significant implications for property rights within Hindu Undivided Families, reaffirming the rights of the Karta and providing guidance on when challenges to their actions can be considered valid.

Legal experts and scholars have lauded this decision as a significant step in upholding the traditions and principles of Hindu family law while also providing clarity on property transactions within HUFs.

Date of Decision: 03-10-2023

N.S. BALAJI VS  THE PRESIDING OFFICER DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL & ORS. 

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/N_S_Balaji_vs_The_Presiding_Officer_Debt_on_3_October_2023.pdf"]

Latest Legal News