Void Marriage Cannot Confer Legal Status: Madhya Pradesh High Court Upholds Injunction Against Woman Claiming Wife’s Status in Bigamy Dispute Mere Presence or Relationship Is Not Enough—Prosecution Must Prove Participation and Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC: Allahabad High Court Evidence of Injured Eye-Witnesses Must Be of Sterling Quality — Not of a Doubtful and Tainted Nature: Bombay High Court Acquits Five Life Convicts in Murder Case Refund of Provisional Pilferage Amount Is Lawful If Theft Not Proved: Calcutta High Court Upholds Acquittal in Electricity Theft Case Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Cannot Be Rejected by Conducting Mini-Trial on Disputed Facts: Delhi High Court Section 17 PWDV Act | Senior Citizen’s Peace Trumps Daughter-in-Law’s Residence Right Where Alternative Accommodation Provided: Delhi High Court Access Must Meet Agricultural Necessities, Not Mere Pedestrian Use: Karnataka High Court Modifies Easement Width from 3 to 6 Feet Section 302 IPC | Suspicion Cannot Substitute Proof: Kerala High Court Acquits Man in Septic Tank Murder Case Domestic Violence Allegations Can’t Always Be Painted as Attempt to Murder: Meghalaya High Court Invokes Section 482 CrPC to Quash Matrimonial Assault Case Post-Settlement Landlord Is Best Judge Of His Need; Son’s Residence In Delhi No Ground To Deny Eviction For Hotel Project: Punjab & Haryana High Court Affirms Eviction Tribunal Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Grant-In-Aid Related Disputes: Orissa High Court Rejects Writ Appeal in Lecturer Promotion Case Educational Institutions Have No Lien Over Students' Future: Rajasthan High Court Slams Withholding of Certificates for Fee Recovery Mere Allegation of Forged Revenue Entries Not Enough to Disturb Settled Possession: Punjab & Haryana High Court Rejects Plea for Injunction Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Litigation Policy is Not Law, Can’t Enforce Guidelines Through Courts: Rajasthan High Court Refuses to Entertain Quo Warranto Against Additional Advocate General’s Appointment Police and Lawyers Are Two Limbs of Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Police Misconduct Incident Sole Testimony, Forensic Gaps, and Withheld Witness: No Conviction Possible: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Murder Trial Remand Keeps the Dispute Alive – Not Arrears: Bombay High Court Holds SVLDRS Relief Must Be Computed Under Litigation Category Use of ‘Absconding’ in Employment Context Not Defamatory Per Se, But A Privileged Communication Under Exception 7 of Section 499 IPC: Allahabad High Court

Proper Application of Section 299 CrPC Justifies Conviction in Absence of Accused – Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a detailed judgment delivered, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in the case of Sukhpal Singh v. NCT of Delhi, thereby upholding the conviction of Sukhpal Singh under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife, Usha. The Bench comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and Sandeep Mehta emphasized that “circumstantial evidence, confessional note, and abscondence conclusively establish guilt.”

The case primarily revolved around the admissibility and reliability of circumstantial evidence, particularly focusing on a confessional note allegedly penned by the appellant, the application of Section 299 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the procedural adherence during the criminal trial.

Sukhpal Singh was accused of murdering his wife by manual strangulation, with the incident dating back to May 20, 1990. The prosecution’s case rested heavily on a confessional note recovered at the crime scene, various eyewitness accounts including that of a neighbor, and the suspect’s unexplained abscondence immediately following his wife’s murder.

The Court found the chain of circumstantial evidence to be complete, leading conclusively to the appellant’s guilt. It held that the confessional note, corroborated by handwriting analysis and witness testimonies, significantly bolstered the prosecution’s case.

Justice Mehta detailed the justification for admitting testimonies recorded in the appellant’s absence, citing his prolonged abscondence as a valid reason for the trial court to proceed under Section 299 CrPC. The Court ruled that all procedural requirements had been met, and the evidences were admissible.

The appellant’s failure to explain his immediate disappearance post the crime and his subsequent ten-year absence were considered indicative of guilty behavior, reinforcing the evidence against him.

Decision: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the trial court’s decision to convict Sukhpal Singh of murder and sentence him to life imprisonment. The Court stated, “The prosecution has successfully demonstrated a complete, unbroken chain of evidence pointing directly to the guilt of the accused, thereby negating any possibility of innocence or involvement of another party.”

Date of Decision: May 7, 2024

Sukhpal Singh v. National Capital Territory of Delhi

Latest Legal News