Marumakkathayam Law | Partition Is An Act By Which The Nature Of The Property Is Changed, Reflecting An Alteration In Ownership: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claim | Compensation Must Aim To Restore, As Far As Possible, What Has Been Irretrievably Lost: Supreme Court Awards Rs. 1.02 Crore Personal Criticism Of Judges Or Recording Findings On Their Conduct In Judgments Must Be Avoided: Supreme Court Efficiency In Arbitral Proceedings Is Integral To Effective Dispute Resolution. Courts Must Ensure That Arbitral Processes Reach Their Logical End: Supreme Court Onus Lies On The Propounder To Remove All Suspicious Circumstances Surrounding A Will To The Satisfaction Of The Court: Calcutta High Court Deeds of Gift Not Governed by Section 22-B of Registration Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Testimony Of  Injured Witness Carries A Built-In Guarantee Of Truthfulness: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempted Murder POCSO | Conviction Cannot Be Sustained Without Conclusive Proof Of Minority - Burden Lies On The Prosecution: Telangana High Court Credible Eyewitness Account, Supported By Forensic Corroboration, Creates An Unassailable Chain Of Proof That Withstands Scrutiny: Punjab and Haryana High Court Jammu & Kashmir High Court Grants Bail to Schizophrenic Mother Accused of Murdering Infant Son IT Act | Ambiguity in statutory notices undermines the principles of natural justice: Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act: Procedural Lapses Insufficient to Overturn Case Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Accused, Points to Possible Suicide Pact in "Tragic Love Affair" Tampering With Historical Documents To Support A Caste Claim Strikes At The Root Of Public Trust And Cannot Be Tolerated: Bombay High Court Offense Impacts Society as a Whole: Madras High Court Denies Bail in Cyber Harassment Case Custody disputes must be resolved in appropriate forums, and courts cannot intervene beyond legal frameworks in the guise of habeas corpus jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Insubordination Is A Contagious Malady In Any Employment And More So In Public Service : Karnataka High Court imposes Rs. 10,000 fine on Tribunal staff for frivolous petition A Show Cause Notice Issued Without Jurisdiction Cannot Withstand Judicial Scrutiny: AP High Court Sets Aside Rs. 75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand Timely Action is Key: P&H HC Upholds Lawful Retirement at 58 for Class-III Employees Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Not Applicable to Civil Court Orders: Patna High Court Uttarakhand High Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown, Acknowledges Cruelty Due to Prolonged Separation Prosecution Must Prove Common Object For An Unlawful Assembly - Conviction Cannot Rest On Assumptions: Telangana High Court

Proper Application of Section 299 CrPC Justifies Conviction in Absence of Accused – Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a detailed judgment delivered, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in the case of Sukhpal Singh v. NCT of Delhi, thereby upholding the conviction of Sukhpal Singh under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife, Usha. The Bench comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and Sandeep Mehta emphasized that “circumstantial evidence, confessional note, and abscondence conclusively establish guilt.”

The case primarily revolved around the admissibility and reliability of circumstantial evidence, particularly focusing on a confessional note allegedly penned by the appellant, the application of Section 299 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the procedural adherence during the criminal trial.

Sukhpal Singh was accused of murdering his wife by manual strangulation, with the incident dating back to May 20, 1990. The prosecution’s case rested heavily on a confessional note recovered at the crime scene, various eyewitness accounts including that of a neighbor, and the suspect’s unexplained abscondence immediately following his wife’s murder.

The Court found the chain of circumstantial evidence to be complete, leading conclusively to the appellant’s guilt. It held that the confessional note, corroborated by handwriting analysis and witness testimonies, significantly bolstered the prosecution’s case.

Justice Mehta detailed the justification for admitting testimonies recorded in the appellant’s absence, citing his prolonged abscondence as a valid reason for the trial court to proceed under Section 299 CrPC. The Court ruled that all procedural requirements had been met, and the evidences were admissible.

The appellant’s failure to explain his immediate disappearance post the crime and his subsequent ten-year absence were considered indicative of guilty behavior, reinforcing the evidence against him.

Decision: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the trial court’s decision to convict Sukhpal Singh of murder and sentence him to life imprisonment. The Court stated, “The prosecution has successfully demonstrated a complete, unbroken chain of evidence pointing directly to the guilt of the accused, thereby negating any possibility of innocence or involvement of another party.”

Date of Decision: May 7, 2024

Sukhpal Singh v. National Capital Territory of Delhi

Similar News